Shifting the balance of power. (Mainstream media stinks.)

, ,

I wake up Wednesday at 4am to a phone call: The Guardian, in London, asking for an interview about my miscarriage twitter. Then a half-hour later, an Irish radio station. And then the phone kept ringing.

I tell Now Magazine (I think it's basically People magazine for the UK audience) to call back after I got the kids off to school. I ask my housemanager to come early because I can’t handle the sleep deprivation and the early-morning interviews and school lunches all in one morning.

I block out the morning to write a thousand-word essay for the Guardian to justify tweeting about my miscarriage. Which the Guardian wants done in the next 20 hours.

Now magazine wants to know if they can send a photographer to take a photo of my kids.

No.

Or the Farmer?

No.

What about if their faces are blurred?

No. (But this at least makes the Farmer laugh.)

The Today show called Tuesday to see if I could be on the show on Thursday. I said yes. They call in between the Guardian and Now magazine to ask if I can fly there.

The first thing I think is that my kids were so sad that I was not taking them to school as usual that I promised to pick them up after school, and I don't want to break the promise.

The only reasonable flight to NYC is at 3:08. I decide that the only thing to do is take my kids with me. I can't bear to simply be gone when they come home from school. I did that so much last year. I don't want to do that anymore.

So I tell the Today Show that I can make it only if they will fly my kids and the nanny with me. And pay for two hotel rooms.

The Today Show says yes. They start booking tickets. I finish interviews and the nanny starts packing. She calls the school to get the kids ready to leave early. She cancels violin lessons and cello lessons and a reading tutor.

I call the Farmer to offer him one last chance to go with us. He doesn't answer. He doesn't take the offer seriously because it is so far from anything he'd ever do. He says he can't believe I'm taking the kids on a trip again when the last business trip I took them on turned out so bad that the police came.

He has a point, but I tell him that I'm taking the nanny along this time.

Then the new CEO of Brazen Careerist calls. He's concerned. I have given a one-hour interview with a tabloid that was not recorded and it's being taken out of context all over the UK.

So we have a two-hour phone call about the Brazen Careerist brand. Should it be tied to me? Is miscarriage a workplace issue? What drives people to sign up at Brazen Careerist anyway?

Wait. Can you just go sign up at the site right now so the CEO can see that a post like this does not hurt the brand and I should just write what I want on my blog?

Okay. So the nanny is decked-out in black, with blown-out blond hair, and she almost looks a little New-York-y for her first-ever visit there, when the Today show calls to say they need to move me to Saturday.

Really?

This is what I thought: Is there enough time for me to get really drunk on junk wine in the fridge before I have to go pick up the kids?

I say no to Saturday.

Later, I get a death threat. This is not new. I have been getting death threats all month but today's death threats are different. They are from the UK, and then from the Australian Christian Coalition. No kidding. Three calls in a row.

This all might be the end of me catering to mainstream media. But. Wait. I'm so happy to be in Inc magazine this month where Max Chafkin wrote a great list of top bloggers. And Max was so easy to deal with. He scheduled a call. We had a nice conversation. And he wrote an intelligent article. He's so good, and considerate that he's almost like a blogger.

But for now, I'm exhausted. And I am thinking that dealing with mainstream media just isn't worth it. I get my own story out, the way I want it, on my blog. I have a smart, engaged audience that is fun to talk to and, when there's something really good, they tell their smart, thoughtful friends. I don't think I need mainstream media. And I know I don't need the ridiculous way they’ve been talking with me.

(Hi, Penelope Trunk? This is Steve from the early show —

What? What early show?

It’s the morning show on CBS.

Oh.

Can you tell me how you justify your tweet?

What?

Just quickly. I'm going into our 4pm meeting and I need a summary of your position.)

So, mainstream media, here’s my position. More than feeling compelled to justify myself to your audience, I feel compelled to protect my schedule and my family from your intrusive calls and seemingly random deadlines. I feel an urgent need to separate a sane online conversation about women at work from an insane media that is doing exactly what destroys women at work: Making it extremely difficult for me to have a manageable schedule for parenting.

179 replies
« Older Comments
  1. Beth V.
    Beth V. says:

    Perceptions. Perceptions. And more perceptions.

    Ryan Paugh is a co-founder of Brazen Careerist, Inc. and has been interviewed on “How to use social media to build a business and online network.”

    Ryan Paugh graduated from Penn State University in 2006 with a Bachelor's in Journalism. He joined Merck & Co, Inc. in the corporate communications field, where he became interested in workplace issues facing Generation Y. He also took an interest in how social media can impact the way we approach our careers. He founded Employee Evolution with Ryan Healy, where he found an outlet for his curiosities.

    Paugh currently lives in Madison, WI and is a co-founder of Brazen Careerist, Inc. His passion is making Brazen Careerist into a community for young professionals to make their voices heard.

    Paugh has been featured in The Wall Street Journal and The Associated Press. He speaks to companies, organizations and students about issues affecting Generation Y and how to leverage social media to better your personal and professional lives.

    During this interview, we discuss how to use social media to build a business and online network. Great stuff?

    Reference Link:

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Y-Talk/blog/2008/05/14/Interview-with-Ryan-Paugh-of-Brazen-Careerist

    Interesting.

    Beth V.

  2. Anonymous
    Anonymous says:

    Thanks for your willingness to discuss the good, the bad, and the ugly of women’s lives, including how personal problems affect our work lives. I have little doubt that your fearlessness will make my life better down the road, when I may be pregnant (or not), miscarrying (or not) and feeling about it however I feel without fear of repercussion.

    To me, the most important issue here is not your personal life, or an abortion, or a miscarriage, or how you felt about it or even Wisconsin laws (though, yes, they seem to have placed you in a shitty situation), but rather the fact that women are virtually forbidden from discussing these commonplace occurrences at work.

    I’m not saying I want to get into the nitty-gritty of my menstrual cycle on the job, but to force women to clam up 100% of the time about issues that clearly influence a majority of us doesn’t help anyone–male or female.

  3. Jenny
    Jenny says:

    I signed up for Brazen Careerist last week. I learned about it from your blog. Without your blog, I wouldn’t have signed up.

  4. Suzanne
    Suzanne says:

    I subscribe to your blog not because I always agree one hundred percent (though this is a case where I do) but because I respect what you write and therefore you. I am grateful for what you share with me your reader.

    Thank you.

  5. CrazyGirl
    CrazyGirl says:

    Maybe this is a stupid question, but…did you actually have a miscarriage–or was your tweet a figure of speech–like “I want to shoot myself this meeting is so boring”? I spent ten minutes browsing your site, and I really couldn’t tell!

  6. Barbara
    Barbara says:

    Last year my 28 yr old daughter had an ectopic pregnancy. I rescheduled a business trip so I could be with her and take her to several dr appts. This year she was due to deliver my first grandchild. I told work associates out-of-state that I would not be there to do a training class and why. They applauded my choice and said they were glad to handle it for me. We are making some progress in the workplace. And it’s with the help of writers like you.

  7. Siobhan
    Siobhan says:

    You might be interested in looking at this:
    http://www.abc.net.au/iview/#/series/andrew

    In Australia we’ve recently had a series of media “outrages.” Julian Morrow, who was partially responsible for one of them recently gave a lecture regarding the phenomena of the media outrage itself and explored the issue of the secondary audience – those who didn’t actually see, hear or read the original broadcast (or tweet!) – but, aided and abetted by media and the broadcast platforms of new media, become outraged and offended, and create a media storm that was not created by the original broadcast itself. Exhausting really.

  8. KateNonymous
    KateNonymous says:

    Penelope, I thought your piece for the Guardian was very good. However, you say this:

    “Others say I should not have discussed my experience on Twitter, but Twitter is not a public forum. Those who want to read my tweets have to sign up to receive my updates.”

    That isn’t the case. Your Tweets are not protected, which means that people do not even need to be logged in to Twitter to read them.

    I’m sorry to hear about the death threats. That’s reprehensible of everyone who has issued one.

  9. Steve Wisbey
    Steve Wisbey says:

    I love what you do! Your wit, self effacing humour, your unabashed honesty…Be Yourself and I’ll try harder to take my own advice and follow your lead.
    From an Australian that doesn’t wish you harm

  10. Devon
    Devon says:

    Hi Penelope :)
    I read your blog reguarly and moved to London about a year ago (from the midwest). I saw a small blurb in the Metro morning paper where it was just your twitter, trying to make it sound bad but I rolled my eyes as it was a month later and only JUST now hitting here….

    Then The Guardian on Friday, and I thought it was rather well-written actually.

    I was surprised actually that it takes that long to have a miscarriage as I didn’t know. I’m glad I know now as I doubt any women would have actually shared that information. :)

  11. Ammi
    Ammi says:

    Kind of baffled by the media furore that followed your Twitter. Have to say, I’m not a twitterer (impossible to say anything in 140 characters and enough Crackberry issues already) but that such a small message could cause such a hoo-haa (sp?) says a lot about how little progress women have actually made.

    I’m recently pregnant, well nearly 4 months in, and I’m constantly amazed at how I’ve become public property and that people who really have no business telling me how I should be doing this or questioning my approach to child rearing (most often, women who have no children…). Since when did a pregnant woman become public property? Since when did we lose all the hard-fought rights to manage our own bodies and childbearing decisions?

    To read your responses to the frankly none-of-their-business commentators and fuss has given me hope – hope that we can stand up and say we do or don’t want to be parents, we might have a glass of wine or cigarette whilst carrying, and that frankly it’s no-ones business whether I give my child pre-packaged food.

    But I’m ranting at http://waitingforbeta.blogspot.com – hey, it beats knitting.

  12. Nancy
    Nancy says:

    The point of your blog was that mainstream media is stupid, misses the point, abuses people, demands too much, and comes onto a story long after it’s over.

    It wasn’t about miscarriages.

    I couldn’t agree with you more. Mainstream media is reactive. It doesn’t create the stories, it just massages them into info-tainment. And it believes it is more important than you.

    Ditto for mainstream publishing, mainstream marketing, etc. They’re followers and bottom-feeders, not heralds and leaders.

    Here’s a topic for another blog: “The internet changes everything.”

  13. Johnny
    Johnny says:

    I think if there’s anything Penelope has proven it’s that most people (ie, almost all of you above me) are naive and can be manipulated like the stupid sheep you are. Or else you never heard of P.T. Barnum.

    • Rachel
      Rachel says:

      And that’s what makes me hesitant to register on this place-all this anachronistic ‘grrl power’ stuff (yuck).

  14. Pam from Canada
    Pam from Canada says:

    I think the media finds your comment offensive because it is a brutally real message from a woman affirming her sexuality instead of being ashamed of it. Don’t give in to the media’s request for you to justify your actions. Also, your in-laws are ridiculous.

  15. Emily
    Emily says:

    “So, mainstream media, here’s my position. More than feeling compelled to justify myself to your audience, I feel compelled to protect my schedule and my family from your intrusive calls and seemingly random deadlines. I feel an urgent need to separate a sane online conversation about women at work from an insane media that is doing exactly what destroys women at work: Making it extremely difficult for me to have a manageable schedule for parenting.”

    If I hadn’t already signed up for Brazen Careerist this would have made me do it. Thanks.

  16. Helen Baxter
    Helen Baxter says:

    Hi Penelope,

    I love your work at Brazen Careerist and admire your refreshing honesty. It is the conspiracy of silence that has allowed this messed up medical system to continue for far too long.

    Best wishes,

    Helen Baxter
    Mohawk Media

  17. Ruth
    Ruth says:

    Way to stand up for your (and my) right as a woman and a parent to have a LIFE! Thanks for blogging and encouraging the rest of us to carve out our own personal space!

  18. Shannon
    Shannon says:

    Regarding how the media attention will affect the Brazen Careerist brand, I think it’s time to give up the pretense that anyone reads this blog for serious career advice. This is The Penelope Trunk Story, and it’s riveting thanks to the events that have occurred in your life and your willingness to divulge them.

  19. Mark W.
    Mark W. says:

    I’ve been using that “View a Random Post” button lately like it’s some sort of lottery quick pick. A random post that came up was titled ‘Job hunt tips I’ve collected’ dated 4/9/07.
    The first item on the list is “Don’t answer the phone when it wakes you up.” Reading further on yields the following – “Time magazine reports that “the morning haze you experience when the alarm clock goes off is known as sleep inertia, and it clouds your brain more than sleep deprivation. The impairment is most severe in the first ten minutes but can linger for up to two hours.” Bottom line: Let the call go to voicemail and go get some coffee.”
    Now I do think The Guardian was unprofessional and inconsiderate when they called at 4 AM but that call should have definitely gone to voicemail.
    Also it looks to me that Now magazine is a cheap imitation of People.
    Your mainstream media rant regarding your experience with both The Today Show and The Early Show is understandable. I know the double whammy close together would leave me bitter. Do you need them? Do they need you? Probably no on both counts but as you well know both of you can use each other to the benefit of each other. Hopefully this experience with mainstream media is not typical in the future. I think there’s more people like Max Chafkin out there in mainstream media.

  20. Crys
    Crys says:

    Hello, I found your blog from Max Chafkin’s article and I’m ever so pleased to have clicked on your name of the few I did click on. I too am a full time working stepmom (Oh yes, I have the three kiddos full time and I work in the publishing business full time). I really appreciated this entry and could relate. Thanks for making me feel like I’m not completely insane for trying to balance a career and parenting. Because I thought I might be. Maybe I am just a little.

  21. Medawar
    Medawar says:

    Medawar found this via “Kat in New York”.

    There are, occasionally, moments when looking after yourself must take precedence over communication.

    Miscarriages can be life-threatening, proceeding towards medical help at flank speed should be the normal response of the moment and sharing the experience can always be done later.

    Interface addiction can be as dangerous as smoking and for much the same reason: people find themselves doing it in situations where the slightest distraction could do them harm.

    Medawar’s Mum saw, through a safety window, when a researcher at Porton Down fished in his lab coat for fags, took his mask off and lit one up. He was in the plague lab and the only appropriate comment she could think of was “goodbye”. (1952 or thereabouts. He died. These days it would probably be a Blackberry: at least you don’t put them in your mouth.)

  22. Jennifer
    Jennifer says:

    This too shall pass. I read several HR blogs and your blog by far has more comments than any of the others. Why? I think because you are honest and that takes courage. People don’t always like or agree with what you say, but they do listen to what you say. Besides, isn’t it better to be listened to? Agreeing with someone all the time is BORING. Ok, gotta go sign up for Brazen Careerist now (that’s for you Penelope!).

  23. mthomas
    mthomas says:

    I do feel that until the government deals with the basic structural problems in our financial system of too much debt, we will not have a sustainable recovery. So even though the stock market can stay irrational in the shorter term, in the long run I believe it will go back to reflecting the fundamentals of our boom and bust economy. And that’s why I continue to feel that for long term investors a better portfolio allocation is in cash and gold. I think the gold price will continue to rise due to a lack of faith in central banks’ policies and in fiat currencies. I recently saw a very interesting articles called What Gold Bubble? Setting the Record Straight which I think is particularly useful for investors to read to get a better sense of what’s going on in the economy and the govt’s role in influencing it.
    2

  24. Jonathan Ross
    Jonathan Ross says:

    Penelope, once again don’t ever change. I’m not telling you anything you don’t know but your realism and honesty set you apart from most everyone else.

    Sounds like you are on the way to needing a media consultant or agent to best filter these media requests and ensure they treat you according to your needs.

    Regardless, congrats for the increased attention and may it always be positive.

    To the religio-fascist terrorists who threatened you I can only say that I hope they get exactly what they deserve.

  25. Colm
    Colm says:

    Well, I came here due to your story being covered in the Irish Independent today, then reading the Daily Hatred(sorry, Mail) rant about TMI, and I’d just like to add my voice to the hundreds saying you go and write whatever you want. F*ck the death threat loonies, the time dumb jobbing journos and anyone, who tries to put you in a neat box and say “don’t say that”.

    Here’s hoping some journos take your side and write about how you’ve been treated, and how *they* are going to have to change.

  26. Genevieve
    Genevieve says:

    I loved your article in the Guardian. You are an eloquent and sensitive writer.

    It absolutely infuriates me when others tell us what we should and should not discuss. When I, a nearly 40 year old woman, became pregnant with my first and very anticipated and planned for child (alternative insemination), people told me I had announced the pregnancy too early, that I was bold. No, not bold. Optimistic. And if I did miscarry, I was more than comfortable telling people I had. People astound me, really.

    Keep on tweeting or twittering or whatever it’s called. People are thirsty for this kind of honesty about subjects thought to be too private to discuss.

  27. Beth V.
    Beth V. says:

    “I feel an urgent need to separate a sane online conversation about women at work from an insane media that is doing exactly what destroys women at work.”

    Maybe is should be re-written in its true context. Replace the “women” with “people.”

    “I feel an urgent need to separate a sane online conversation about “people” at work from an insane media that is doing exactly what destroys “people” at work.

    A true and fair context, as it applies to everyone, is both “men and women” at work, not limited to the “women at work.”

    Lets be equal and fair, but honest.

    Respectifully,

    Beth V.

    • Mitch
      Mitch says:

      I think she is talking specifically about women’s issues at work. Men don’t have misacrriages at work, so this is not an issue for them. Of course they are affected in many other ways, but not this one. That’s all she was implying.

  28. Michelle
    Michelle says:

    Hi,

    I found you via the gaurdian comments section. reading what others wrote about your twitter comment, before I even read the full comment itself has been very interesting!

    I shall be following you in the future!

    All the best,

    MW

  29. Laura
    Laura says:

    Penelope: I've been thinking all week about your death threats from Christian groups. A couple of questions spring to mind:
    1) Do religious groups incorporate the death threat committee with the welcoming committee? A good cop, bad cop situation?
    2) Has there been a new release of the Bible in which Jesus is a sociopath? I'm not talking about turning over a few tables in the Temple. I sometimes wonder if the flock has strayed too far from the Master.
    I hope one of your critics could shed some light on those questions for me. I am glad that you're illuminating such important issues.
    Thanks!

  30. Sylvia
    Sylvia says:

    As the recently managed-out single mother of three children age 9 and under, can I just say, you are my new heroine. I spent 8 years at one of the top 50 companies to work for (according to Fortune). But I just couldn’t give them everything they wanted even working 60 hours a week. Thank you for a dose of reality.

  31. Bridget
    Bridget says:

    I am not going to read the Guardian article-sorry. But I did watch you on an interview on some show maybe CNN? I thought you did a fabulous job and I learned something from you. I learned that if one keeps their wits about them they can frame the conversation and make it engaging no matter what question one is asked. I believe this is advice you provided in one of your career blogs about interviews. So it was great to see that in action. Plus I loved that although the gentleman interviewing you made some statements in an attempt to insight you to lose composure, you didn’t. I thought you did a beautiful job with the media and it was fantastic to watch you in action.

    I worry for your safety based on the vigilante anti-choice individuals worldwide. So sorry that speaking openly about your personal experience has lead to this base response. Take care!

  32. Mitch
    Mitch says:

    Penelope, I am kind of in love with you in an Aspergery sort of way. I love your clean-cutness–but it is not “brutal honesty.” This is just honesty. And it’s perhaps a lot for folks unused to speaking about the unspeakable to chew on. But I love it, and I do not detect one iota of sensationalism on your part. I will be reading a lot more of you.

    I support you fully in not engaging the voracious mainstream media Twitterazzi. When you go to their turf, they become the referee and the other team. Stick to your home base and post all “press releases” here, and refer all callers here. As you can see, you have an army of supporters here and we will come to your aid.

    Solidarity from Boston,
    Mitch of PositiveJuice.com

  33. Robert Baraby
    Robert Baraby says:

    I really am impressed with how much you have worked to make this website so enjoyable. Thanks a lot for your effort. Many thanks to the person who made this post, this was very informative for me. Please continue this awesome work.

« Older Comments

Comments are closed.