I collect data points constantly, and I index them by topic, and I always hope that they will come together in an interesting, useful way. Lots of times, that doesn’t happen, and I just have to throw ideas away, because I have a rule for myself that I have to be useful in every post.
But today I’m trying something new. I’m doing a post that is useless to you. Here are four ideas I was just about to toss out as incurably useless, but instead, I bring them to you:
1. Law firms are making concessions for women.
One of the top law firms in the world, Allen Overy, just announced they are letting people become part-time partners. This would be news if no one had tried it before. But many firms that have already done this in response to the extreme brain drain in the legal profession due to women leaving law firms because they are so inflexible.
So now there is the idea that there can be a part-time partner. Fortunately, like most things in workplace reform, Gen X-ers have already been the guinea pigs. My friends, in fact, have tried this. And it turns out that if you give a lawyer a part-time job, she ends up working 50 hours a week instead of 80, and gets part-time credit, which isn’t exactly encouraging.
2. People live together instead of getting married.
This is not news you can use because you already know it. This is what I said to Hannah Seligson, who asked me to write about her new book, A Little Bit Married: How to Know When it's Time to Walk Down the Aisle or Out the Door.
I like Hannah. She wrote a great piece for the Daily Beast, about the orgasm gap between men and women. I also like Hannah because when I told her that I thought her book was not news, she exhibited a charming relentlessness about publicizing her book, and she told me:
- Co-habitation is a bigger step in the marriage direction for women than men.
- Women are ready to get married before men, even when they're already living together.
This mostly seems like things have not changed. In fact, the most surprising thing about this news is that women are earning more than men, and men have seen a generation of women with fertility nightmares from putting off having children in favor of building their career, yet still, nothing changes in the marriage equation.
So I don’t know about this book. I’m not sure how useful it is. And I think a book on the orgasm gap would have been more useful, but maybe Hanna's got a few orgasm pages tucked into this book…
3. Texting while driving is bad.
Already 19 states prohibit texting while driving, so that’s gotta make you think twice about doing it in the other 31. Also, it’s clear that even if you’re great with just one-finger on the keyboard, texting while driving is more dangerous than driving drunk.
I would never drive drunk. But I text in car all the time. I tell myself not to, and then I do just one more quick one.
Which is why this falls into the category of news you cannot use: Texting while driving requires the same rules for oneself that driving drunk require. We each self-police, and it’s an issue of self-respect, but also, a social contract with the other people on the road that we will not endanger each other’s lives.
You decide where you are and then no amount of scaring you changes you. So, I read the data, and then I texted that very day. I know I’m a terrible person. But I’m not ready to make the change.
4. Pig sex is on the demise.
The farmer went to grad school for pig genetics, and he has a lot of pigs on his farm. The farmer buys boy pigs to impregnate the girl pigs. But the last batch of boys he bought did not know how to have sex. They would mount the girl pigs, but their penis didn’t go in where it was supposed to. The farmer tells me that so much of pig reproduction is by artificial insemination now that farmers aren’t breeding for pigs who know how to have sex. This is amazing to me. Though I cannot think of how to use the knowledge in any work except farm work.
Okay. So we’re at the end of my post. I thought it would be fun to write about stuff I wish was useful but it is not. I thought it would be fun to break the rule that I have to be useful. But you know what? It wasn’t fun.
My blog is about me doing something nice for you, and then, in turn, you doing something nice for me, by talking about what I want to talk about. But if I am not trying to be useful to you in some way, then I’m not really in a relationship with you. I'm just writing like it's my diary.
There is something really fulfilling about being useful. So here's my tip: You should be useful to readers each time you post. It feels better. For everyone.
This post is supported by San Diego Defense Lawyers: Find the best San Diego DUI Attorney for professional help and expert advice.





Well heck :) I learned 4 things I didn't know… especially about pig sex. They say knowledge is power right?
Posted by Maren Kate on January 25, 2010 at 10:27 pm | permalink |
Your blog is always useful to me. No matter what you write about, there is always something in it that resonates. That's what makes you such the gifted writer. Now I have to run upstairs and tell my husband that there are actually pigs that don't know how to have sex. He loves random facts so he will likely share that at work tomorrow. I will too. See, useful still…
Angela Connor
@communitygirl
Posted by Angela Connor on January 25, 2010 at 10:29 pm | permalink |
Umm… are you running out of things to talk about???
Posted by LDR on January 25, 2010 at 10:29 pm | permalink |
That's what I'm wondering too. If you need more things that are inconsequential to the workplace, I can help.
Posted by Lance Haun on January 25, 2010 at 11:29 pm | permalink |
Recently learned of a bumper sticker making the roads in Alabama…
Honk if you love Jesus, text if you want to meet him.
Sums it up nicely, I think.
Posted by Laura Atkins on January 25, 2010 at 10:37 pm | permalink |
I do love Jesus, and I love that bumper sticker too. That says it perfectly. Except that the texter may not be the dead one, which is really sad.
Texting on straight roads out in the middle of nowhere, or in incredibly slow traffic in the middle of a gridlock, might be tempting for texters.
I don't have texting on my phone, but dialing a phone number is just as bad, even if shorter.
Posted by Sarah on January 26, 2010 at 10:40 am | permalink |
Except that dialling a number can be through a hands-free set. Nearly everyone in Australia uses hands-free sets for their phones, while in the car.
Posted by Caitlin @ Roaming Tales on January 26, 2010 at 1:44 pm | permalink |
That's interesting and somewhat unsettling information about swine. It seems to me that a bit TOO MUCH selective breeding has gone on with domestic animals. Now we get boars who can't succeed at intercourse. We get pedigreed bulldogs that can only give birth by caesarian, because the puppies' heads are too big, and collies that have been bred to have such narrow heads that now they have eye problems. We get domestic turkeys that are too stupid to get in out of the rain.
Enough is enough.
Posted by Jim C. on January 25, 2010 at 10:51 pm | permalink |
Thanks, your last comments stick for us budding bloggers.
Posted by Isao on January 25, 2010 at 11:13 pm | permalink |
What school has a graduate program in pig genetics? That's interesting
Posted by Jill on January 25, 2010 at 11:16 pm | permalink |
The information on orgasms was fascinating for me. Sadly, I can't use that information to get a girlfriend.
Posted by econopete on January 25, 2010 at 11:16 pm | permalink |
what method do you use to collect and organize your data points? I'm always picking up random tidbits that i'd like to make sense of, too, but i never know how to hold on to them.
Posted by bayley on January 25, 2010 at 11:24 pm | permalink |
I used to use Excel. It's a good way to organize things but a cumbersome way to store URLs. Now I use Gmail because it's all searchable. I mail myself URLs and label them in the subject hed. Then I have a sort of searchable database of ideas, and I delete the ideas from my system when I think they'll never fit anywhere.
Penelope
Posted by Penelope Trunk on January 26, 2010 at 6:09 am | permalink |
I'm a fan of mixx.com for that.
Posted by KateNonymous on January 26, 2010 at 11:49 am | permalink |
Nice. Good to know about the swine sex thing. Going to drop it in conversation at my next dinner party.
Re: texting. I, too, fight the urge, even though I know it is extremely dangerous/foolish. I have to find that bumper sticker Laura Atkins mentioned. Genius.
Posted by eddy on January 25, 2010 at 11:35 pm | permalink |
You were useful AND educational to me today :) Thanks!! I will have to talk to my dad about the pig breeding issue. We live on an Angus Beef farm. I wonder if he has noticed that problem with our cattle.
Posted by Mel on January 25, 2010 at 11:42 pm | permalink |
If this is the level of information you're texting about, dear god, stop. Texting while driving is the most self-indulgent, irresponsible, idiotic thing you can do. Are you stupid? Because there's really no excuse.
Posted by Elaine on January 26, 2010 at 12:05 am | permalink |
LOL brilliant point!
Posted by Thanh Lu on January 26, 2010 at 12:40 am | permalink |
This has been a very useful blog alright. This is your open diary for us. We get a glimpse of who you are and at the same time, get something new. Now, about that pig sex thing, maybe the farmer doesn't know how to distinguish a "potential breeding male" to those who are not capable of having sex. Here in our country, we have ONE dominant pig male that would give a offsprings to all the female population pigs. :)
Posted by Kathy Holiday on January 26, 2010 at 1:19 am | permalink |
Mhhh.. I am texting most of the day and especially when im driving. Shall I hide that?
Posted by Samuel on January 26, 2010 at 2:03 am | permalink |
No. You should stop before you kill someone. Seriously.
Posted by Mike on January 26, 2010 at 11:01 am | permalink |
I think what this post has illustrated is that it's great to have rules. Tried and tested rules that you stick to, like a formula for success. Your personal rule to be useful to readers has served you extremely well and earned you a loyal following.
I like the fact that you broke your rule for this post. That is the useful message for me today. To remember that its ok to break the rules occasionally!
Posted by Gerty on January 26, 2010 at 2:13 am | permalink |
I thaught reading this post was fun. Some more or less needless knowledge inside the ride :)
Posted by thermoskanne on January 26, 2010 at 3:11 am | permalink |
I actually found #4 to be quite useful, and I don't work on a pig farm or for the pork industry. It's a real life example of the unintended consequences of systems manipulation. If you manipulate a system to maximize specific results, you sometimes end up with systems that don't "work" in other, crucial ways.
I used to be a big car texter. I stopped when one of my favorite TV show characters was killed off in a car crash. Oddly enough, the death was not related to cell phone use in any way, and was only peripherally related to the car accident itself. Our brains work in weird ways sometimes.
And this is the part where we all talk about what you wanted us to talk about :).
Posted by Jess @OpenlyBalanced on January 26, 2010 at 3:16 am | permalink |
I've texted while driving. Maybe 10 times in 7 years. Mostly at stoplights while the light is red. The couple of times I've done it going at 40 or 50 mph, I did a quick 1-letter and back on the road, quick 1-letter and back on the road… so that basically I was no more taking my eyes off the road ahead than I would to look over my shoulder before getting in the passing lane.
I'm not endorsing texting while driving. But I think that there are different ways that people do it, and I would venture to say that these gray areas are where people give themselves permission… kind of like Penelope and I do. :-)
Penelope, I appreciate you bringing up things honestly that people get herky-jerky about. Dogmatic "never do that!" responses don't really add anything to the discussion. Frankly, the "never do that!" axioms only make things more necessary to talk about. Your brazenness shines through even on a leftovers post, and it lights the way. Thank you.
Posted by Mitch on January 26, 2010 at 3:43 am | permalink |
I've driven drunk. It's ok. I'm a better driver than most people. And I only drink beer, not vodka.
See, that sounds pretty dumb.
Put down the phone and drive. If you need to text that badly get off the road.
Posted by Mike on January 26, 2010 at 11:03 am | permalink |
Personally, I also learned something useful in the pig factoid. Hey, sometimes we really NEED a good opening line at a cocktail party. It's useful!!!
Posted by Kay Lorraine on January 26, 2010 at 4:40 am | permalink |
"There is something really fulfilling about being useful. So here's my tip: You should be useful to readers each time you post. It feels better. For everyone."
I've honestly never actually found any post you've written really, practically useful [I'm sorry, I don't get all this Gen-X Y Z Q W A B C stuff, it's like reading lines of code], but I've always found them entertaining.
That's why I come back, not because I find the information applicable in my life.
[Out of all the stats the pig sex one is probably the only one I'll remember by the end of the day]
So I must disagree with the last para or so of your post I'm afraid.
A useful blog may not always be a blog you'd subscribe to.
Posted by J on January 26, 2010 at 5:25 am | permalink |
Your equivocation about texting while driving is the most morally repugnant thing you have said in your blog since you suggested that abortion was a right just because it is legal by some of our state governments.
Texting and driving must stop.
YOU ARE GOING TO KILL SOMEONE – PROBABLY YOUR KIDS.
You have no right to tell someone texting is wrong and then say, wink-wink, you still do it because you just can't seem to make yourself stop.
STOP! NOW!!! PLEASE!
I like you and your blog. But your ego is making a choice for you that is wrong. There is nothing in your career or personal life that is so important that it has to be accomplished by a text in the middle of traffic. If you think otherwise, you are wrong, wrong, wrong. For hell's sake pull over to the side of the road and do your damned texting.
People are dying, my friend. Please stop.
Other than that, have a nice day.
Posted by W J P on January 26, 2010 at 5:59 am | permalink |
Amen.
Posted by Mike on January 26, 2010 at 11:10 am | permalink |
Based on what you've written here, the concept of "rights" eludes you.
In a state where abortion is not prohibited by law, a woman does, indeed, have the right to it.
In a country where free speech is guaranteed by law, a person does, indeed, have the right to say "I think this behavior is bad, but I am going to do it anyway."
What you mean is, "I disagree with you."
Now, I do understand that there are large swaths of Americans that truly believe X should not be a right, because they disagree with the idea, but it's not actually the same thing.
Posted by Sara on January 26, 2010 at 12:40 pm | permalink |
"Although I already know people are living together instead of getting married… the reminder that it's true makes me sad in my heart. Is this really a more successful model for people than marriage?
I just can't allow myself to enter into a "half-way" contract with a man – like let's pretend we're committed to each other, when really we're not. Maybe I need security in my life more than most people, but I just couldn't handle it. I don't want to join my life to someone in a temporary way."
Sara, I mean no disrespect when I say this, but I think you have it all wrong. To me, it seems like a safer way to ease into a marriage (living together prior to marrying), if for no other reason than to see if you can actually stand being around that person all the time. Living with your significant other is much different than just being with them a lot. When you live with someone, you learn a lot more about them just when you thought you knew it all. Are you coming from a religious stance on this? I am not quite sure why you are against two people in a loving, committed relationship moving in together as the step between partnership and marriage. In my opinion, when couples do this they save themselves from having to go through a painful divorce, or worse, having children who have to go through that with them when they have lived under the same roof for a couple years and realize they made a big mistake and can't stand each other. This country was founded by puritans, and as we have evolved we have seen over the course of history the end of people getting married at 17 or 18 just because they didn't want to disappoint their families, but really wanted to be intimate with their partner without being looked upon as a sinner. I will say it is a double edged sword, as now when two people marry they may jump into it faster because divorce is so prevalent and widely accepted in today's society where it didn't used to be, so they feel it isn't permanent because divorce is always an option. Would you rather see people getting divorced more often, or people living together out of wedlock? I think you need to cool down with emotions and keep your eyes on your own paper, don't worry about what other people choose to do with their lives, and especially their relationships. You are entitled to your beliefs, even if they are dated, but you shouldn't expect anyone else (outside of your church) to feel the same way.
Posted by Depakote Lawyer on August 29, 2011 at 4:15 pm | permalink |
Although I already know people are living together instead of getting married… the reminder that it's true makes me sad in my heart. Is this really a more successful model for people than marriage?
I just can't allow myself to enter into a "half-way" contract with a man – like let's pretend we're committed to each other, when really we're not. Maybe I need security in my life more than most people, but I just couldn't handle it. I don't want to join my life to someone in a temporary way.
Posted by Becky on January 26, 2010 at 6:54 am | permalink |
Hi Becky,
I find this comment really interesting. I sort of agree but sort of disagree. Personally, I've lived with someone twice (and am still unmarried, though I currently live with my fiance). If something happened and I re-entered the dating scene, I don't think I would live with someone again except if we became engaged. My fiance and I were lucky to realize we wanted to get married after we moved in together, but I don't think I'd want to take the chance of breaking up post-move-in with someone else.
Before my fiance I lived with someone I did not see myself ever getting married to. That was terrible. When we broke up I was in a bad position money-wise and I wondered why I had bothered moving in with him. But on the other hand I think living with him made me decide he wasn't for me much faster than I might have if he just took me out Saturday nights.
My other thought is that in my province, after living together for a year you are considered common law. So, tax-wise, you are as good as married. You can go a step further and sign a document stating you are partners if you wish to remain unmarried but want to be recognized as life partners (with the legal rights that entails.)
I have no real answer on this one, even having been on the going-to-marry and not-going-to-marry sides of the living together fence. I think maybe the living together as "trial period" culture is misguided. Not because it's not helpful, but because it's very painful and trying. I feel like there must be an easier way to evaluate a partner. But if you're just against marriage for whatever reason, or on a long road to marriage…living together is a good alternative.
Posted by Jill on January 26, 2010 at 9:55 am | permalink |
I think simply- many people do not need a piece of paper or a white dress to be committed to one another.
I lived with my husband for 5 years before we got married. We choose to get married after ten years of a committed relationship when we began discussing having children and moving across the country. Not to prove our commitment to one another- but to ensure that we were tied to each other legally as we moved into a new stage of our lives. At that point it just made sense. We weren't pretending up until the point that we signed a piece of paper. Putting so much importance in a ceremony, well that- that is what "makes me sad in my heart".
Keep in mind, a lot of marriages end in divorce. That piece of paper isn't the security that you are looking for. Only the right person can provide that whether you are married or just living together.
Posted by Dana on January 26, 2010 at 6:05 pm | permalink |
At least there's a link among some of those items. It sounds like there is an orgasm gap for girl pigs too. :D
Posted by KMS on January 26, 2010 at 7:04 am | permalink |
My friend was killed while texting in his car, not to mention the other car he hit was written off, and that driver suffered a few broken bones..Maybe you should rethink the whole texting while driving thing?
Posted by Ron Hawkins on January 26, 2010 at 7:16 am | permalink |
I have found that the first step to rethinking something is to come clean about it publicly, and see how it feels to talk about what I'm really doing in my life: Does it still feel okay when it's public?
And the comments section today is probably the tipping point for me taking the step to stop texting while driving.
-Penelope
Posted by Penelope Trunk on January 26, 2010 at 8:22 am | permalink |
But then if we’re in a relationship with you, we recognize that you cannot always be on top form, so we allow you those days where you just post those “diary” entries⎯not that this one was that way at all. Don’t be so hard on yourself.
The pig sex was pretty fascinating. The link to how women are earning more than men in big cities: interesting.
And the texting one: so super important. I know you can try to say that it’s useless, because you are going to continue thinking of it in some distant, abstract fashion that’s not relevant to you, but I think that’s just lame laziness. This may not help the imagery at all but has anyone seen the movie “Seven Pounds?” C’mon now. Do you really want that on your chest?
You’re a mother. You should at least be able to see it in those terms. It’s one of those classic don’t-miss-it-till-you-don’t-have-it-anymore scenarios. Next time you wake up in the morning, try to remember how lucky you are that your mind does not immediately go to that person you killed because you had to text: “Running late. I’ll be there in 5 minutes.”
Really. There’s no reason you cannot pull over to say that. It takes an extra two minutes at the most. And two minutes of inconvenience compared to a lifetime of crushing guilt? Next time you text while driving, you’re admitting that you’d be okay with the latter.
Posted by Margaret on January 26, 2010 at 7:40 am | permalink |
I think that #1 is useful – or at the very least, hopeful. Even if it's been tried many times before, publicized news about part-time law partner possibilities brings us one teeny-tiny step closer to the corporate wake-up we really need to fit our work and family needs together (whether we're lawyers or not). And I'd much rather work 50 hours and get part-time credit than work 80 and get all the credit in the world. Becoming partner is not all that it used to mean, my lawyer friends tell me, and most part-time lawyers can make 'enough,' together with their home partners, to support their families.
And the texting idea is also useful. I hadn't thought before about how MUCH it resembles the decisions we make about driving after drinking. This gives me more pause before clicking those buttons than other things I've read recently on the topic.
So, thanks, Penelope!
Posted by Amy Vachon on January 26, 2010 at 7:44 am | permalink |
To this:
"YOU ARE GOING TO KILL SOMEONE – PROBABLY YOUR KIDS."
I would add, "and if not your own kids, somebody else's."
Unplug for a minute, mama. Enjoy the unconnectedness. There's nothing to text about that can't wait, and if there is, you can always pull over.
I enjoy your blog, and I care about you, and I would hate to pop over one day and read about the wreck you had while texting.
Posted by Lauren on January 26, 2010 at 7:47 am | permalink |
The Butterball turkey you had for Thanksgiving was a product of artificial insemination. Today's commercial tom turkeys are so huge, they can barely walk, let alone mount a hen.
Posted by JR on January 26, 2010 at 7:50 am | permalink |
I find it interesting that there are now billboards telling me not to text and drive. Thank you for diverting my attention from my phone to a place that 50 feet away from the road. I wonder how many drivers have lost control of their cars or failed to notice a mandatory merge while reading the driving instructions for the nearest Cracker Barrel.
Posted by Jenny on January 26, 2010 at 7:59 am | permalink |
Turkeys don't know how to have sex anymore either. Or how to nest. Turkeys are bred in incubators and fertilized with machines. Barbara Kingsolver describes how her male turkeys would do their tail-feather mating dance to the watering can instead of to the females.
More useless information.
Posted by Nancy on January 26, 2010 at 8:19 am | permalink |
@Nancy You know, I don't think it's so useless. I think we should all know more about the food we eat and maybe make some changes. The Barbara Kingsolver book you mention, Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, is excellent.
Posted by Caitlin @ Roaming Tales on January 26, 2010 at 1:50 pm | permalink |
Thank, I'm ordering "A Little Bit Married: How to Know When it's Time to Walk Down the Aisle or Out the Door."
Posted by Regina on January 26, 2010 at 8:20 am | permalink |
A book about a trend of people CHOOSING to live together instead of getting married might be useful.
I've lived with my partner for 8 years. We don't have any intention of getting married, but we are peer pressured about it all the time.
Posted by Becky on January 26, 2010 at 8:38 am | permalink |
i've been the victim of a text-and-run. was crossing a crosswalk and had the right of way, but some idiot decided texting while driving was more important, and coasted through the light. still dealing with the medical bills.
anyone – yes, anyone – who texts and drives deserves the worst that could possibly happen to them. put down the damned phone. there is NOTHING so important it cannot wait until you reach your destination…and if it is, pull over and contact whomever.
Posted by stillinpain on January 26, 2010 at 8:41 am | permalink |
The TV version of "This American Life" has a segment on pig genetics and breeding. It made me think twice about eating (or not eating) pork. I'd feel better if I knew where it came from.
It's an instant dowload on Netflix too.
http://www.thisamericanlife.org/TV_Episode.aspx?episode=6
Posted by Michelle on January 26, 2010 at 8:44 am | permalink |
I would argue that item #1 isn't an example of law firms becoming more flexible, but moreso an example of law firms realizing that with the GLUT of graduating lawyers they can afford to offer jobs that pay far less despite only requiring marginally fewer hours.
Posted by Marc KS on January 26, 2010 at 9:11 am | permalink |
+1 to factory farm turkeys also being part of the non-breeding set. In addition, Temple Grandin makes the point that pigs bred for lean are also meaner, temperamentally. More likely to eat their young, and each other.
I don't get texting while driving. Perhaps because I'm old enough to not fully get texting, and old enough to know people who have killed other people while driving drunk. That's a hard problem to get over. Won't be long before we have the same sentencing for DWT as we do for DWI/DUI.
We just lost a mother and one child locally for cell-phone-driving through the level crossing at the same time the train arrived. The baby survived, protected by the baby seat.
Kill yourself, fine. Kill your own kids, not my problem. But please don't think you'll be welcome at the funeral if you kill someone I know.
Posted by Karen on January 26, 2010 at 9:25 am | permalink |
I freaking love this post. And I particularly adore the fact that the family-friendly law firm is called "Overy."
Posted by Elizabeth on January 26, 2010 at 9:42 am | permalink |
Remind me never to drive in Wisconsin. I never texted in my car. I'm glad it's a skill I never mastered, however, I did drive and talk on my phone. I've since pledged to change that and I have to admit it's hard, but I remind myself that people lived without phones in their cars for years and managed just fine. It can wait. If people don't like that you didn't pick up your phone, that's their problem.
Posted by T on January 26, 2010 at 9:43 am | permalink |
Hi Penelope!
Although you just wrote a post that was essentially useless from a certain perspective, I think you hit on a very interesting point with the exercise itself.
Something that I have been encountering in my life is that it's often very difficult to force ourselves to just do something or not to do something–to superficially change our patterns of behavior. You touch on this a little bit with the texting. You know, statistically, that texting is dangerous while driving. However, you haven't internalized that danger. You don't FEEL that texting is dangerous, so there is no reason for you to change your behavior, because the underlying belief has not changed.
I believe that this same principle applies to this post. You believe that posting useless items is not appropriate behavior for sundry reasons. At the same time, you were tempted to do it anyway…so you did. While this created what you deem an unfulfilling experience, you were also able to reinforce the belief that you need to post things that were "useful," making it much less likely that you will break one of your personal behavioral rules in the past.
I think that it makes it much easier to fight back an occasional urge to do something when I have given in, allowed myself to recognize what I hate about the experience in the first place, and then use that memory the next time the urge comes around. Instead of telling yourself "I want to do this, but I shouldn't" it becomes more about "I don't want to do this in the first place because last time I did, it kind of sucked." Maybe some of us don't need this kind of reinforcement, but I find that my life is a lot easier when I am not constantly FORCING myself to do things, but instead acting in concert with my inner person.
At any rate, I've been reading your blog for a year now, and this was the first post I've actually responded to…so go figure. :)
Posted by Brenda on January 26, 2010 at 10:13 am | permalink |
The occasional "useless" post is just fine with me. I don't read your post for their usefulness anyway, because most don't really apply to my situation.
I doubt I'm the only one. So feel free to write interesting, useless stuff on occasion. You are still meeting your readers "needs". After all, we don't make sure that everything we say in every relationship is useful. It's hardly a relationship if we must.
Posted by Sarah on January 26, 2010 at 10:45 am | permalink |
I like this post because I do the same thing–I collect information, because you never know when it's going to wind up being useful. Sometimes it doesn't, and sometimes I'm able to pass it along to someone who can use it, but hadn't found it.
I agree with your assessment about some of this info. It doesn't seem new, so I'm not sure why people are putting it out there, except that too many of us are not aware that we aren't really innovating. So maybe there's something in that. Do enough research to know whether or not you're innovating.
The pig sex bit, though, seems like a natural lead for a post about what we lose or give up in pursuit of particular goals. It brings to mind Barbara Kingsolver's Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, and Michael Pollan's books, and from there you could go into other technologies. That's not inherently new, either, but it could be presented in a way that gets people's attention.
Posted by KateNonymous on January 26, 2010 at 10:55 am | permalink |
You really think people come here for USEFUL information? That's your Asperger's, I guess.
We come here to read something interesting, have a discussion, connect with other readers and commenters, and get a sense of virtual community around shared interests with other smart people.
So, this post was great, except for the end where you shit on it. :)
I actually think the law firm thing is REALLY interesting and useful, as it shows how completely out of whack some sectors of employment still are, in thinking that job = life. I, too, know female lawyers who work "part-time" at 40-50 hours/week, then go home and do all the child rearing and housekeeping. These are the lawyers who should start their own firm, keep their own hours, and get paid for the time and effort they put in, not for the gap between the time they put in and the time their employers expect of them.
[ / steps down off soapbox ]
Posted by Tzipporah on January 26, 2010 at 11:00 am | permalink |
that's not entirely true. we do come here for valuable information, but I get what you were trying to say.
Posted by stop snoring aids on November 16, 2010 at 3:41 pm | permalink |
Also, if I see someone texting while driving when I'm out in the car with my 3 year old, I AM f-ing calling the cops.
Posted by Tzipporah on January 26, 2010 at 11:01 am | permalink |
Ironic!
Posted by KateNonymous on January 26, 2010 at 12:38 pm | permalink |
Ha!
Posted by Susan on January 26, 2010 at 2:09 pm | permalink |
I know it's scary, Penelope, but your pig sex fact is going to go down in history. Who can resist telling this to everyone they know? See, all your blogs are useful.
Posted by Tara on January 26, 2010 at 11:19 am | permalink |
You might enjoy Mary Roach's book "Bonk", which has an entire chapter on pig sex (mostly artificial insemination, stimulated by the presence of boars paraded around to get the sows in the mood).
Things I learned:
Pig ejaculation takes a long time, on the order of minutes.
Pigs are the only known species aside from humans to stimulate the female's breasts during copulation.
The shape of the generative organs is rather odd.
If the sow experiences orgasm during insemination, probability of a successful impregnation increases (by 6% if I remember correctly). The Danish government sponsored an educational program to help their farmers satisfy the sows, providing us educational materials (posters, videos) that are hilarious to those of us who don't truly appreciate just how economically important not missing a fertile month can be to a farmer.
Posted by Jens Fiederer on January 26, 2010 at 11:24 am | permalink |
Love this comment. The Farmer can't stand reading the blog anymore — it kills him to read the mean comments, (like the McDonald's post, for exampel.) Which means that he won't read this comment, and I will surprise him with the Bonk book, and he will be thrilled with the pig chapter.
Thanks for the tip.
-Penelope
Posted by Penelope Trunk on January 26, 2010 at 4:25 pm | permalink |
Gee, who knew? I've lived in the Pig Farming Capital of the Universe (that would be Iowa) for most of my life and didn't know that about pigs. Maybe they just need a little music? It works for me. (snort).
JS
Posted by Julie on January 26, 2010 at 11:32 am | permalink |
Despite what you say at the beginning of your post, I would bet that somewhere your collection (or even in a previous post) you have a data point – or at least a story – about people who capitalize on information/resources other people have thrown out as "useless" – or people who, in a strange place at a strange time, suddenly needed some previously "useless" knowledge they had filed away. It seems like the surplus availability of knowledge on the Internet, and the fact that we're testing multiple ways of taking in (both strategically, with searches, and casually, with, say, RSS feeds) – are expanding our understanding of "useful" knowledge.
Posted by Jennifer Chuong on January 26, 2010 at 11:47 am | permalink |
"Pig sex is on the demise."
I don't know about the rest of you, but I learned something new today!
Posted by Jacqueline on January 26, 2010 at 12:02 pm | permalink |
There's always SOMETHING useful about your posts. For example, I read Hannah Seligson's orgasm article because of your post, which I never would've heard of otherwise. And it IS amazing that pigs don't know how to have sex anymore! Sometimes it's useful just to learn a new thing or two. Thanks for posting :)
Posted by Erin on January 26, 2010 at 12:31 pm | permalink |
I thought about you and your farmer as I read The Guernsey Literary and the Potato Peel Pie Society. Check it out.
Posted by Marjory on January 26, 2010 at 12:33 pm | permalink |
Thanks, your last comments stick for us budding bloggers.
Posted by ilan ver on January 26, 2010 at 1:05 pm | permalink |
Not fun..? Of course it was fun and very usefull. You've given me fodder for conversation at my next cocktail party…okay maybe after I've had a few too many and fallen down drunk..
You're right…it wasn't fun…
Oh well…that's OK. Your other posts are awesome! Keep 'em coming.
Last thing Penelope: Ask farmer what's a chicken diaper? (more cocktail party fodder…)
Posted by Scot on January 26, 2010 at 1:09 pm | permalink |
I doubt a true farmer would know what a chicken diaper is! They are mainly used by people so crazy about their pet chickens they can't stop themselves from bringing the chicken into their house. I have 4 chickens (hens) in my backyard, but none of them come inside, so no need for chicken diapers. I did put a chicken saddle on one of my hens, though, as the rooster I (unintentionally) had for a while did some damage to her. Apparently he knew more than those pigs the farmer got. ;-)
Posted by Linda in Chicago on January 26, 2010 at 2:37 pm | permalink |
yes, we should all stop texting while driving. this really is serious and we should all know better. i am making huge efforts to do just that but its difficult. we just had 2 cases locally in which people died bec/ of cell phone use while driving, and it scared me to try to stop.
but WHY isn't anyone else upset about Seligson's orgasm story?? am i the only 44 year old woman who sees this as just another facet of lower respect for ourselves (speaking to women)?? why isn't this talked about? mothers teach your daughters to take care of this!
Posted by Lori on January 26, 2010 at 1:21 pm | permalink |
@Lori I'm not angry about it because it's partly driven by biology. It is typically far easier for a man to climax than a woman. Also an orgasm is not the only source of enjoyment.
Of course, it's a problem if one partner is the giver and one partner is the taker in bed or anywhere else. I'm sure this happens more than it should.
I think both partners should absolutely give equally in bed, but I don't think this necessarily results in equal numbers of orgasms.
Posted by Caitlin @ Roaming Tales on January 26, 2010 at 2:00 pm | permalink |
Many people will admit that texting while driving defies common sense and do it anyway. Recent research suggests that we are becoming a society of text addicts, stuck in a dopamine-driven loop of seek-fulfillment-seek – see this Slate article http://www.slate.com/id/2224932/.
If you're trying to break the habit – and I do hope you will decide you're ready to soon, especially if you're serious about upholding your end of the social contract – then ZoomSafer http://www.zoomsafer.com can help. It's software for your phone that automatically activates so you can't give in to the urge to text or email behind the wheel.
Posted by EleanorJ on January 26, 2010 at 1:22 pm | permalink |
The more that I get to know you, the more self centered and selfish you appear. Texting while driving, why not just pull over and stop? You will likely kill your kids and/or someone else's kids, but then you have already reveealed that you have no problem killikng unborn kids so why should kids intrude on your fun? Asperbergs is one thing, being totally self centered is something else again.
Posted by John Wilder on January 26, 2010 at 1:36 pm | permalink |
Texting while driving is still illegal in the other 31 states. There doesn't have to be a specific law against it – it comes under reckless driving.
I think the info about part-time partners is interesting, especially your insight about why it doesn't work. It could be useful for someone who is thinking about going part time themselves or offering it to their staff.
Waning pig sex – just another thing that's wrong with modern agriculture. Turkeys no longer have sex either – but pigs are far more intelligent than turkeys.
Posted by Caitlin @ Roaming Tales on January 26, 2010 at 1:43 pm | permalink |
I am loving it! Will come back again
Posted by kiralik daireler on January 26, 2010 at 1:47 pm | permalink |
As for texting while driving, I think this says it all:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ttNgZDZruI
Posted by jrandom42 on January 26, 2010 at 1:47 pm | permalink |
The pig news surprises me for two reasons:
1. Pigs are supposed to be very intelligent. Surely that includes knowing where to put it.
2. Pigs reputedly have six minute orgasms (Source: Washington Post, Style section, Oct or Nov, 1979; close as I can get you.)
I used to use this factoid in my standup act.
First I'd say: "Do you know pigs have six minute orgasms?"
Then I'd snort a couple times.
Then I'd say: "You gotta practice."
Usually got a laugh. 'Course, joke debuted when I was a student at U of Iowa, Pig Capital, USA.
Well, not the U of Iowa, IOWA.
But still got laughs in DC, when I moved back to Capital Metro Area.
So this post has been useful, Pen.
Because laughter is useful. It's a symptom of joy.
And joy is priceless.
Enjoy!
Posted by Jay on January 26, 2010 at 2:02 pm | permalink |
i love your blog. and the way my mind works, too much linear thinking makes me tune out. i like finding the thread in a diversity of ideas, and while that thread didn't appear in your post, i'll enjoy discovering how it's relevant in the days ahead. I'm sure the pieces will fit somewhere….
thanks penelope.
Posted by rebecca on January 26, 2010 at 2:11 pm | permalink |
Here, I can comment on TWO of your topics:
1) I am a lawyer and while there may be the option of so-called "part-time" partnership in BigLaw, it does not exist in SmallLaw. And SmallLaw is where 90% (or more) of lawyers end up. Shocking, huh? I sometimes wish you wouldn't lump law in with the corporate jobs on which you comment because being a lawyer is NOT like being an employee in a corporation and law firms do not run like corporations. In fact, law firms are usually poorly managed (especially the small ones) because they are run by lawyers and not by business-people. So there's that.
2. And now I can combine my job with your texting blurb. I just got a new case in. The case is this: Plaintiff's estate is suing my client and the client's auto insurer for texting while on I-94 on the way to Milwaukee. Texter was not paying attention to the road, crossed the centerline, lost control of the vehicle, and hit another car head-on. Everyone in plaintiff's car, with the exception of a baby, died. Texter died, texter's passenger suffered major internal damage.
So, the lesson? TEXTING WHILE DRIVING WILL GET YOU AND OTHER PEOPLE ON THE ROAD KILLED.
Posted by Ariella on January 26, 2010 at 2:14 pm | permalink |
Maybe we're not understanding what you mean by texting while driving. Does this mean you are texting while the car is actually moving?
In Illinois it is now illegal to text while driving. With Chicago having some of the worst traffic in the nation, I do get bored sitting in my running car not moving at all, or moving very, very slowly (5-10 mph). What's wrong with doing something else at that point? Am I likely to hurt or kill anyone in such a situation? Unfortunately, there has to be a blanket "never do that" aspect to laws such as this.
I personally don't think it's a problem to be otherwise occupied when you are sitting in the drivers seat but don't have the option to actually operate the car in anyway. The only difference between doing this and pulling over is that you don't have to wrestle your way back into the traffic queue.
As for the cohabitation/marriage issue, I think there has been a lot of examination of what defines a marriage in the past few years. I was married for 11 years and don't see any reason to get married again. A couple can have great commitment to each other without getting married. Marriage simply makes it easier to do certain legal things and get health benefits.
Posted by Linda in Chicago on January 26, 2010 at 2:30 pm | permalink |
The pig thing is interesting to me: This American Life live show had an episode where they filmed a commercial pig farm. The artificial insemination was part of this episode. It makes sense that pigs would lose the understanding of how to procreate.
Since then, I have done my best to not eat any pig products unless I know what farm they came from. They always taste better from a small farm, anyway.
Posted by LaneEllen on January 26, 2010 at 2:37 pm | permalink |
I suppose utility is in the eye of the beholder. I read your blog because I find you entertaining and I am also interested in how a woman with Asperger's Syndrome manages her life (my daughter was recently diagnosed with AS). It looks like I'm a career governemnt worker so much of what you write is not evidently useful to me in my workplace. However, it seems to me knowledge in general can be useful even when applied in unintended scenarios. Isn't that the whole idea of higher education? Immerse the students in a lot of seemingly irrelevant information thus making them well-rounded?
Seriously? Can a pig forget how to have sex? Isn't this an instinctual thing? Well, I suppose some trial and error is involved. . .I mean, if I hadn't read the manual, I suppose I wouldn't know exactly what to do (with humans that is). . .sounds like the pigs are having mostly error. . .maybe there's some anatomical shortcoming?
Posted by Dan on January 26, 2010 at 4:14 pm | permalink |
I suppose I won't be the first commenter to point out the "useful is in the eye of the beholder". I'll do it anyway.
I wonder which set of readers you're thinking of when you define what will be useful to them?
Posted by Emily on January 26, 2010 at 4:24 pm | permalink |
Thanks for the interesting trivia, though I confess to thinking this isn't your most interesting blog, It did make me think of a few issues I would love to see you write more about, such as:
1) Have you ever been confronted with people at work with wildly different spiritual/religious/social beliefs than yours, and how well did you work with them or they with you?
2)Do you think this whole pigs not being breed to know how to have sex has any merit as metaphor for how people are training themselves?
Posted by Robert on January 26, 2010 at 4:28 pm | permalink |
Nice article, thanks for the information. And stop texting while driving !
Posted by Nathan Rodriguez on January 26, 2010 at 8:58 pm | permalink |
I did not think you would get slammed that hard on the texting. I mean, I am not pleased that you are texting while driving. I will say, "It is very dangerous. Please try to stop." Now my job is done. I think the readers should at least give you credit for being honest about it.
Posted by Carol G on January 26, 2010 at 10:01 pm | permalink |
I am so tempted to talk on the phone or text while driving my three children all around the universe, but unlike you, I have been scared straight by the statistics. To prevent myself from making the potentially harmful choice of using the phone while driving, I put the phone in the backseat. Done! Check! Try it. Please.
Also have to say that it's nice to be without that distraction–better for my relationship with the kids, better for my own state of mind and relaxation.
Posted by Cagey on January 26, 2010 at 11:45 pm | permalink |
I love this kind of post because of the broad array of topics. I'll use it somewhere, sometime – or it will inspire something. So, yes, I gained something Penelope – thanks.
No more texting while driving, please. I'm being selfish and would like to continue to read your blog.
Posted by Masha Keeffer on January 26, 2010 at 11:59 pm | permalink |
They have text dictation now. It's an Iphone app. Dragon speak I think? It works well and is fun to play with!
I thought #4 was really interesting and a bit horrifying.
I saw you mentioned you use excel up there to organize data points. I'd be really interested in a post about e-organizing or to even hear anyone else's thoughts on hwo they keep all their things organized (inboxes, tags, etc..).
Posted by Lisa on January 27, 2010 at 12:16 am | permalink |
Texting while driving is bad.. well.. if they say so, EVERYTHING while driving is bad. Getting your hands on the radio, searching for your cigarettes, searching for the lighter, drinking water or searching for the bottle! :D
Posted by Jamie on January 27, 2010 at 4:18 am | permalink |
Texting while driving is the most irresponsible thing you can do.
Posted by Ravel on January 27, 2010 at 7:15 am | permalink |
Ravel – not even close. I'd have to nominate "setting off nuclear weapons in a highly populated area" for that spot, but I'm sure there's competition (altering the earth's orbit to take it very close to the sun is probably worse, but not really feasible with the current state of technology).
Texting while driving is highly irresponsible when done at high speeds on a busy highway, much less irresponsible when you are driving during the daytime on a Texas road where there's nobody else visible up to the horizon, and completely forgivable when you are stopped at a traffic light.
Posted by Jens Fiederer on January 27, 2010 at 8:14 am | permalink |
Confession time for me. I've texted while driving (actually moving) on rare occasions myself, obviously not taking my eye off the road for as much as a second at a time – but still definitely a bit distracted.
I do resist. Once I had lunch with a friend of mine and she mentioned that pretty much everybody had seen topless pictures of her. I commented that I hadn't. As I was driving home, I heard the tone for "received multimedia message". I waited until I got home, very proud of myself for that one.
Posted by Jens Fiederer on January 27, 2010 at 8:19 am | permalink |
Texting while driving is so dangerous. These comments asking for Penelope to stop DWT are really just a unanimous shout-out asking ALL of the readers here to stop!
I am another one who has texted while driving, and I can keep my eyes on the road just as well (or poorly) as the next driver. But believe me, there have been some CLOSE calls. I don't do it anymore…
And please, readers, don't try to convince us that when you are going 5-10 mph in a traffic jam that it's safe to text. Haven't you ever had that inattentive driver right behind you who slams on her brakes at the very last second!? Haven't u ever done that!?
I ran head-on into a 200 lb. buck on a dark and rainy night with my 9 y/o in the car. Was I distracted because I heard my favorite song on the radio and had decided to turn it up just a split-second before the crash? I dunno. Point is, distractions while driving aren't entirely avoidable, except when it comes to the texting. We just don't want to have to say, "I told you so."
Posted by Holly on January 27, 2010 at 9:03 am | permalink |
"These comments asking for Penelope to stop DWT are really just a unanimous shout-out asking ALL of the readers here to stop!"
I agree…except that the shouters here seem to be yelling at Penelope as if she's the only one who texts while driving. Let's be clear, here – she's the only one who is HONEST about texting while driving. I don't know what the statistics are, but I imagine a great percentage of Americans text and drive (and I am one, on occasion).
So. One piece of this blog that is useful is the thinking process P shares here about WHY she continue(d) to text and drive…how do we each rationalize? What does it take for each of us to stop? I know – for me – this conversation will probably do it. However (just for the record) any change I make is NOT in response to the strident, holier than thou crowd, but rather because the thoughtful responses made me rethink.
Posted by Denise on January 27, 2010 at 11:09 am | permalink |
Apparently Gretchen Rubin from The Happiness Project Blog thought "A Little Bit Married" was worth reading, she interviewed the girl. And that's why I keep coming back to Brazen Careerist: you are authentic enough to say what you really thought about the book. Well, at least by reading the interview I could confirm there wasn't anything new there…what a waste!
Posted by Mariana on January 27, 2010 at 12:07 pm | permalink |
The most interesting thing that has come out of this post for me is to understand how people organize their information to use for blog posts or discussion later on. I usually also do the Gmail thing of putting links in separate messages but often don't label them, resulting in a mess.
Although I was skeptical/underwhelmed with Tyler Cowen's book when I reviewed an advanced copy (http://bit.ly/bjPjoY) I'm starting to think this information organization/synthesis process is key to interesting blogs.
Posted by Vicki on January 27, 2010 at 2:05 pm | permalink |
This can apply to careers. So many people seek to be interesting or visable in the workplace. But it is all for naught unles your are helpful.
Or, how can we join all this random information?
Women are not buying this part-time partner thing in the workplace because they still end up working full-time, just with less recognition when what they would rather be doing is focusing on their relationships (which is why they agree to co-habit) which requires communication (which is why they text), but since no one has time to communicate,they text while driving to make the most of every moment which is necessary because of our hectic schedules, but they are so busy, they have forgotton how to enjoy the moment, even in the area of sex – like the pigs, they just go through the motions of it because it becomes another thing on the to-do list.
Nope. Even more random.
Posted by Grace on January 27, 2010 at 2:17 pm | permalink |
Sometimes information for the sake of learning is enough reason to share. But almost always we can learn just from hearing (or seeing) information we are already aware of from the perspective of someone else.
Damn, I may be screwed if our blogs should all include USEFUL information!
Thanks for sharing, as always!
Posted by Samantha Parvin on January 27, 2010 at 4:19 pm | permalink |
i know a few people who got married without having lived together first and it really didn't work out for them, while there is no guarantee i find it silly that people don't live together at least for a while before getting married, i mean, when you live with someone that is when you start to really know what they are like!
Posted by adelaide dancing on January 27, 2010 at 5:00 pm | permalink |
The fact txting while driving is more dangerous than drunk driving makes me think of the billboards that say Report Drunk Driving followed by a phone number…
Posted by Bock on January 27, 2010 at 6:49 pm | permalink |
I would disagree a little about the law firms having part-time partners… I think when we see flexible work arrangements in the stodgiest of industries, that starts to really change the norm.
Love ya!
Posted by amy on January 27, 2010 at 8:44 pm | permalink |
A year ago I wrote a post about the things I learned during the worst ice storm in Oklahoma history. And, then it set in a file for, well, a year. Now, this week comes news of a similar approaching storm. So, I pull out the 11 things I learned in the worst ice storm ever post – and posted it and tweeted it and facebooked it – and today, a record # of RTs and twice as many hits as normal. but, i still prefer writing in my diary to being useful…
Posted by jen on January 27, 2010 at 10:06 pm | permalink |
I'm also guilty of breaking the social contract with others on the road… putting it in that perspective makes me think. I'll see about kicking the texting-while-driving habit, so this post won't be totally useless ;)
Posted by Isobel Joaquin on January 28, 2010 at 6:21 am | permalink |
So, I have to share this interesting story I heard on NPR the other day, about why farmers had more sex appeal to cave women than hunter/gatherers. Hopefully it doesn't fall in the useless information category; at least it's interesting :)
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122944258&ps=cprs
Posted by Tiffany Monhollon on January 28, 2010 at 8:42 am | permalink |
Tiffany – that article does make certain assumptions. The Y chromosome can be tracked (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Y-chromosome_DNA_haplogroup for how we are divided into haplogroups by the y chromosomes of our fathers – there is a similar grouping of mtDNA haplotypes that covers the matrilineal descent), but the bit about European women welcoming the farmers with open arms assumes these women had a choice in the matter. We know the genetics, but not the history….and farmers and herders can support higher population density, and thus larger armed forces, than hunter-gatherers.
Posted by Jens Fiederer on January 28, 2010 at 8:54 am | permalink |
Can't tell the difference between this post and your other posts. Haven't found many posts that can be useful in the workplace.
Posted by Leroy Butler on January 28, 2010 at 9:13 am | permalink |
You'd think that a company with one "Overy" at the top would have no problem with people with two ovaries at the top, even if they work half-time (40 hours a week).
Does one "Overy" = 2 ovaries/2?
:-)
Cheers,
Nora
Posted by Nora on January 28, 2010 at 9:22 am | permalink |
Because the pigs aren't bred to have the inate ability to have sex, they lose it? Hilarious! I would have never thought about that in a million years. Too funny.
Posted by Funny on January 28, 2010 at 3:27 pm | permalink |
Does entertainment count as being useful? I foresee that comment about pig sex being a conversation starter once or twice.
Posted by Marina on January 28, 2010 at 7:34 pm | permalink |
Interesting trumps useful 72% of the time. OK, I just made that up, but interesting is important.
The people that subscribe to your blog probably care a lot about interesting. The people that find blog posts matching their search terms probably care more about useful.
Or I could be oversimplifying. Because I care so much more about interesting.
Posted by Heather on January 28, 2010 at 8:06 pm | permalink |
Not enough people are telling you not to text while you drive. Stop texting while you drive. Fine, you came clean. Now stop. You will kill someone. And I guarantee you generally suck as a driver. Every time I see someone do something stupid on the road, they are on the phone/texting. Stop. Besides, don't you have trouble with directions and navigation because of your AS? Stop!!!!
Posted by Joselle on January 28, 2010 at 9:40 pm | permalink |
Re texting while driving……What is your reaction to the drinker who says, sure, I understand the issue but IIm going to drink and drive anyway? i won't be the one to cause an accident because (blah, blah, blah)
Next time you see a bad crash get out of your car and see if you can get close enough to look at a body. Really look.
Posted by Mr. Steele on January 29, 2010 at 7:04 am | permalink |
Don't think that, just because something was not immediately useful or doesn't relate to something else, that it wasn't useful. Knowing three facts about a lot of things makes it a lot easier to get through life.
Scot
Posted by scot phelps on January 30, 2010 at 1:23 pm | permalink |
In my point of view women should work just like men do, and that becomes a reason to less marriages and more singles. As you referred in the post real marriages became less and living together more. Living together is simply easier.
Funny post, but true.
Posted by versos amor on March 2, 2010 at 8:48 pm | permalink |