Amen!! The job market has changed so much that most parents are clueless about how it works in 2007. The only part I would disagree with is that you don't have to earn enough money to pay rent and buy food (appears in the Yahoo! column and not on here).

I understand the sentiment, but I don't think employers should be able to get away with expecting good work for sub-standard salaries. My first year out of college I worked 60 hour weeks, lived in a cramped 4-bedroom in a questionable neighborhood and mostly ate rice and pasta. When I asked for a raise they explained that entry-level salaries are calculated with the assumption that parents are subsidizing the rent and other living expenses. I found that offensive, so I left (among other reasons).

Determined to make it work, I now have decent apartment in a (still) expensive city, a job I like that pays 30% more and I never had to ask my parents for subsidy because I budgeted carefully and refused to compromise on salary.

All great advice, but I take issue with a couple statements.

First, I don't think that you'll necessarily be a better employee for taking time off and creating resume gaps. I've "found myself" by working different imperfect jobs and finding out what I liked and what didn't. And this type of exploration is a little more financially responsible.

Also, I definitely disagree with saying that those who live with their parents after college "have a distinct advantage in their entrance into adult life." They may have a distinct financial advantage, but here is where it stops.

How are you learning about being an adult when you're rent-free and utility-free or even paying way under the going rate? That leaves a lot of expendable income that keeps you from having to set priorities and learn what it's like to live with limits. These are some of the experiences that have really taught me about myself and about what life as an adult really is.

Yes, I may have tight finances for a few more years than those who chose to live at home, but I wouldn't trade my experiences and truly feel like they give me the upperhand.

I would say that the majority of your advice is probably right on – if the company is managed, the supervisor you are working for and the "hiring agent" are all between the ages of 25 and 40. If not, I would suggest this is not the best advice.
I would also venture to say that that the author has yet to be placed into the situation of advising her own recent college graduates…

Your statements about law school are off target. The reality is that Law School, like almost all school, value attention spans; the most important skill that helps to digest large amounts of information. The practice of law, however, does not value "sales skills," but problem solving. The reality is that very few educational programs teach real problem solving, partially because so few of the teachers are themselves affective problem solvers.

As a practicing lawyer for over 10 years, I can say there are very few jobs that provide the challenges that come with solving multiple complex problems across many different disciplines. In addition, the practice of law provides an excellent living; one of the best without having to put your personal capital at risk.

There are unhappy people in the practice of law. In my opinion, the reason for this is that the best law students rarely make the best lawyers. However, the professional itself is alive and well. I encourage anyone interested to give it a shot.

Penelope,

I'll try to say this nicely. This is the biggest load of horse pucky I've ever seen. You are not a hiring manager or a CEO. Please stop pretending that you live in the real job world. This stuff is so damaging to people who are really looking for a career.

Alan,

Be good a good student in law school takes an entirely different skill set than actually representing clients. The practice of law values problem solving and creative solutions. It is the application of dilligence to intuition. Acquiring good grades in law school, as well as most schools, require an incredibly long attention span(the ability to spend hundreds of hours in a library reading). This skill has very little application in the real world.

For whatever reason, law firms tend to hire the law students with the best grades. This paradoxically promotes the individuals who are least prepared to deal with the issues they will face. These individuals are invariably unhappy, and with the golden handcuffs of a large salary, find it hard to leave the professional.

Steve

* * * * * *
Thanks for this comment, Steve.  You give great, specific examples to describe the law school problem. I bet this comment will help a lot of people in their decision-making process.

 –Penelope

You obviously do not have children old enough to graduate from college. As the parent of 1 graduate and 1 college junior, I can tell you that moving back in with parents is awful advice. Oh sure it may be easier for the graduate, but what about the parents. Maybe just maybe they don't want their kids moving back in. Maybe the parents are happy to have an empty nest after (for me) 37 years of parenting. Maybe just maybe the parents want their freedom back and do not want an extra person mooching off them any more……My children were all raised to be independent and 3 of them are supporting themselves, and the youngest has no intention of living at home after she graduates. Of course we help them financially when they need it, but I personally do not want any of them living at home again. 37 years of parenting is enough!!!!

* * * * * * *

Laura. You say that you won't let your kids live at home but you'll help them financially. A lot of parents cannot afford to help their kids financially, beyond letting their kids move back home. Letting kids move back home is free, and 58% of parents are doing it. I'm sure many parents would prefer to give their kids money for their own place instead of giving them a room in the house. But most parents can't afford that.

-Penelope

Penelope, I trust your judgement on each of these items independently, but it seems that points 3 and 5 are somewhat contradictory. Point 3 indicates that it's a buyer's market where recent grads have a lot of leverage in hiring negotiations. Point 5 indicates that entry level positions cannot and will not pay enough to facilitate independent living. I can see where this is another situation where one can pick time or pick money, but it still seems contradictory because most people would pick money, thus resolving in part issue #5.

As for people moving back home… I just graduated, so I can give personal anecdotal evidence on this point. I'd say that most of my friends are moving home *for a brief period of time* immediately following graduation. Many of them have not spent significant amounts of time with their families in 4 years and miss that interaction. At the same time, many of them are not getting jobs with "adequate compensation" that would allow them to live individually. However, it seems that the people with crappy paychecks didn't really put much effort into finding "grown-up jobs". (My favorite example is the former roomate who graduated in the top of her class as an English major and only looked for jobs in the daycare industry.) These two factors combined indicates that a lot of these people don't necessarily percieve themselves as being independent adults anyways. Add in the new social phenomenon of Helicopter Parents and you see how this generation works. I'd also like to go on the record saying that this apparent "baby-fication" of this generation is probably positive in that it indicates a strengthening of family ties and increased levels of familial social support. This leads to cultural continuity and countries with stronger family bonding typically have lower crime and suicide rates. (Suddenly, I sense that I have spun off into a tangent.)

I do have one question about the 58% statistic: how does that number account for students who marry immediately following graduation? This is still a common phenomenon, at least in my region, and I would expect most newlywed couples to form independent households. So, if the 58% is only single students, then probably only a third of all college graduates moves back home with their parents. But if the 58% includes marrried students, then half a generation moves back home after graduating. (I'd also be interested to see the statistics on how long people are spending at home following graduation.)

* * * * * *
The average age for women to get married is 27 and men is 28. I think people who get married right out of college are relatively rare.

–Penelope

Says Penelope: *"If there are no gaps in your résumé, it probably means you didn’t take any time in your life for reflecting. Sure, you can do your reflecting in the shower or during a boring meeting or on an invigorating run. But grand thinking requires grand amounts of time."*

Not always. We both know gaps are not necessarily benign, and many managers and recruiters still look for the unbroken march to the summit as a sign of saleability. I chose the honesty route and I paid for it. I had a résumé with gaps at the end: the point where I dove out of corporate work into massage school, a psycho ward, county jail, and then a supermarket. Obviously I don't want any of this on my résumé. I had a canned explanation but it didn't necessarily wash. So the hole stayed there, and it kept me from being submitted to at least one place: they told me as much without knowing the real story. In effect I was told to pad, i.e., to lie.