Here's a post for all the people who are trying to be artists. It is not a friendly post. I do not think that people who want to create art need to get paid to do it. Do you get paid to have sex? No. Same thing. You love it, but you just do it after work. And sometimes, if you are driven mad by it, you leave work in the middle of the day for it.
Treat art the same way, and you will stay sane. Really. Here are five things I would nag you about if you were talking with me about your burgeoning career as an artist:
1. You cannot do art if you are starving.
The starving artist routine is total bullshit. I know because I did it. Once you know that you are not going to make rent, you can't really make art. Because your sense of self-preservation insists that your brain focus on the possibility that you will be out on the street. Your brain cannot stop solving that problem long enough to solve the problem of what is truth and beauty.
Here are some things I did while I was becoming a writer: I ate only bagels because I didn't have enough money for anything else and then I got anemic and had to go to the doctor but I didn't have health insurance so I had to lie and say I did in order to get the iron pills I needed so that I didn't pass out from exhaustion the moment I woke up in the morning. Believe me, I was not making great art during this period.
2. Art emanating from a black hole is a choice.
There's a reason that Jean-Michel Basquiat's paintings look like horror films: Because his life was a crack-house horror film. And there's a reason that Picasso is tearing apart voluptuous women in gorgeous surroundings: That's what he did in real life.
So don't kid yourself: Your art reflects your surroundings, and you can live like a pauper, but that limits the range of your art.
During my art days, I did not go out with friends. Ever. Because I didn't even have enough money to go to a coffee shop. And I was always cold because I lived in Boston and didn't have a winter coat. At many points I did not have a home, so I just sort of carried my laptop around and wrote and hoped that something would come up by the end of the day. And I almost never had clean clothes because I didn't have money to buy detergent.
So I wrote stories, every day, about not seeing anyone, and my mentor would say things like, "How about adding a character so that the narrator can have a conversation?" And that would strike me as a revolutionary idea.
3. Real artists will make art no matter what.
You do not need a studio, or a desk, or peace and quiet. Really. Because making art comes from a place that you cannot stop. People who need to make art make art no matter what.
Do you know how many blog posts I throw out? Maybe two a week. Because sometimes something happens and I absolutely have to write about it, and I see, from the beginning, that there's no way I'll be able to relate it to careers, so it's going to end up in the blogging trash can. But I write it anyway.
Do you know Christo and Jeanne-Claude? Wait. Here, look at some photos. The guy is nuts. He thinks so big that it makes him crazy. He's been making plans to put up cloth all over Central Park for 26 years. He can't stop himself. Finally, he did it. But who knew if it would ever happen? This is what I mean. If you need to do art, you just go there. Nothing stops you.
So if you think you're an artist and you are not making art now, but you think that in the right circumstance you'd make art, you are lying to yourself. I'm sorry. But it's true. Unless you are starving. If you are starving, see point number one: You need to get a job.
4. You do not need to quit your day job.
Are you making money and you're wondering if you should quit your job to do art full time? Take this test: Did you marry rich? Do you have a trust fund? Do you have reliable buyers for almost everything you produce? If you did not answer yes to any of these, then keep your day job.
Don't tell me it's crushing your soul. This whole blog is about how your soul does not depend on your job or your boss or your paycheck. Click on some links and read them.
Also, most corporate jobs can be creative outlets because businesses solve problems. So if you are an inherently creative thinker, you probably bring that to whatever job you have. You can't stop yourself.
5. You are not a better artist if you can do it full time.
I don't want to see snooty comments on this post about how great you are for being able to support yourself with your art. Because I can do that too. And you know what? I was not a worse writer when I could not support myself. The only difference between artists making money and artists not making money is that the first group is better at business. And there is no evidence that artists who are better at business make better art.
Do you want to know if you're going to be good at earning money from art? Take this test about networking from UpMo and Pepperdine University. The test will tell you how good you are at networking. And if you are not good at this test, you are not going to be good at selling your art, because the days of discovering someone with a sawed-off ear in an insane asylum are over. You need to market yourself. Do you want to know why there are so many crappy films in the world? Because there are so many great networkers who want to direct.
So everyone can stop being a snob about asking people how much money they make from their art. And everyone can stop thinking that the be-all-end-all is to quit the day job and do art full time.
Do you want to know how to be an artist? Make art. Do it because you need to do it. Because you think you will die if you don't do it. Stop making it a career problem. It's not. And, I leave you with one of my favorite posts, that I never get to link to, about me making myself crazy being an artist.









I was, for most of my 20's, a talented and serious bass player. I gigged, I was recognized by peers, etc. Yet I was aware that I was not in the class of best of best: Pastorius, etc. Many of the sidemen I played with were shocked when I steered towards the tech career I had building. I saw the younger competition graduating from Berkley, Julliard, Eastman, even the self-taught. These young guys and gals, very competent bassists, were already taking up 5 string instruments and new techniques.
Many of the younger musicians were willing to live hand to mouth as I had. I also at that point had had my fill of starving session to session, gig to gig. I never got negative feedback on my talent; I just knew that I was just outside the echelon of the super talented, lucky, or whatever, to convert the career as a bass player with well over 10 years on the road and in the studio and nightclubs.
I had started at 13, seriously taking lessons, attending music camp, was accepted to Berkley ( took a road gig at that crucial moment).
I was making a living as a bass player and paying my modest, single man's bills. 25 years later, I ask some of my old compatriots who are still in the business – all making the same for a gig as they did in 1979-88, I ask, "how do you do it, the sacrifice, the starving the lack of income predictability?"
Mind the answer, they are all talented and now older journeyman musicians and still work often, "We don't know how to do anything else."
This is their trade. They have been faithful, I took a professional path in tech (which now looks about as unsettled).
Posted by Alan Wilensky on 02/06/2009 at 09:40am | permalink | Reply to this comment
i loved this post. i read a blog from an artist (http://abeautifulmess.typepad.com/) that is really just amazing at networking and not so amazing at art. but she is making her living selling her art, which always baffles me. so thanks for this post, it made everything much more clear.
Posted by Jane on 02/06/2009 at 09:41am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Great points; they all seem right. Except the art = sex thing. Sex is only appreciated/consumed/experienced by the 2 people having it, whereas most artists have quite grander expectations for the size of the audience for their art, right?
(Unless you just mean that you have sex for yourself, and should be doing your art for yourself too, in which case I'd agree. There's nothing worse than an artist trying to make the world a more beautiful for us slobs.)
Posted by Jane on 02/06/2009 at 09:58am | permalink | Reply to this comment
I used to make a living being an artist. You can, in fact, make a decent income being an artist. But you have to remember one thing…you need to make art that people will want to buy.
Posted by Sharlyn Lauby on 02/06/2009 at 10:08am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Penelope – It's great that you are posting more often. The quality of your posts have gone up a lot in the last couple weeks. I really enjoy your point of view and I have recommended your blog to quite a few people.
Posted by John on 02/06/2009 at 10:35am | permalink | Reply to this comment
This puts things back to reality for me sort of, thank you.
I want to be an artist because I get restless, but I often think I am just not brave enough to quit my day job and go for it.
I think sometimes that suffering you described is sort of necessary, and good.
So I think I'm still going to quit my day job someday and go pursue whatever I want to pursue.
I can't make art at work… at least not until I quit the work will I know.
Posted by NYC on 02/06/2009 at 10:52am | permalink | Reply to this comment
But you forget that art is an industry. It isn't about indulging your inner desire for self expression, but about engaging with critical ideas that inform the culture, and participating in the development of those ideas. I agree with the fact that you can't make good art while you are starving – you can't do anything while you are starving. The fact that people bring up the subject of starvation in relation to artists so often is just a cliche. Art plays a crucial role and is frequently misunderstood as something 'extra', something 'personal'. It is neither. Art is thinking with materials.
Posted by kate on 02/06/2009 at 11:24am | permalink | Reply to this comment
From Harry Chapin "Mr. Tanner"
"Mister Tanner was a cleaner from a town in the Midwest.
And of all the cleaning shops around he'd made his the best.
But he also was a baritone who sang while hanging clothes.
He practiced scales while pressing tails and sang at local shows.
His friends and neighbors praised the voice that poured out from his throat.
They said that he should use his gift instead of cleaning coats.
But music was his life, it was not his livelihood,
and it made him feel so happy and it made him feel so good.
And he sang from his heart and he sang from his soul.
He did not know how well he sang; It just made him whole.
His friends kept working on him to try music out full time.
A big debut and rave reviews, a great career to climb.
Finally they got to him, he would take the fling.
A concert agent in New York agreed to have him sing.
And there were plane tickets, phone calls, money spent to rent the hall.
It took most of his savings but he gladly used them all.
But music was his life, it was not his livelihood,
and it made him feel so happy and it made him feel so good.
And he sang from his heart and he sang from his soul.
He did not know how well he sang; It just made him whole.
The evening came, he took the stage, his face set in a smile.
And in the half filled hall the critics sat watching on the aisle.
But the concert was a blur to him, spatters of applause.
He did not know how well he sang, he only heard the flaws.
But the critics were concise, it only took four lines.
But no one could accuse them of being over kind.
(spoken) Mr. Martin Tanner, Baritone, of Dayton, Ohio made his
Town Hall debut last night. He came well prepared, but unfortunately
his presentation was not up to contemporary professional standards.
His voice lacks the range of tonal color necessary to make it
consistently interesting.
(sung) Full time consideration of another endeavor might be in order.
He came home to Dayton and was questioned by his friends.
Then he smiled and just said nothing and he never sang again,
excepting very late at night when the shop was dark and closed.
He sang softly to himself as he sorted through the clothes.
Music was his life, it was not his livelihood,
and it made him feel so happy and it made him feel so good.
And he sang from his heart and he sang from his soul.
(And) he did not know how well he sang; It just made him whole."
Posted by jrandom42 on 02/06/2009 at 11:31am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Many great points to ponder. Most artists I've known can't hold a job because they are so preoccupied with their art. But, one exception to this was my father, who was a brilliant poet. (I know what you're thinking – all of you -that every poet is brilliant. But, you don't understand. My father is that brilliant poet that one day you're children will study in comp i and ii. He was Roethke-brilliant; Poe-brilliant. He worked by the sweat of his brow most of his life – in the Navy on ships. He was an atomic veteran. He worked in the god-forsaken metals industry. He strapped trailors in brutal winters and for awhile assessed property and assigned taxes. His life was hard, but he never, ever gave up on his art and he never quit making it and he was driven by something bigger than himself – something that was not intimidated or the least bit derailed by all his crappy jobs, which he took, by the way, so all his kids could eat. Forgive the indulgence, but, thank you Dad, for making the poetry *and* still having the sense and sanity to go to work everyday.
Posted by jenx67 on 02/06/2009 at 11:33am | permalink | Reply to this comment
"Real artists will make art no matter what."
If you are not doing what you really love, then you don't really love it. Are non-producing artists really as passionate as they think they are? The people I know who truly love their art are always looking for inspiration and then acting on it. They don't need more time/research/funding/connections/understanding in order to create. They just do it because they can't help but do it.
And, they still keep their day jobs.
Posted by Grace on 02/06/2009 at 11:35am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Non-producing artists can be every bit as passionate as they think/say they are. Some day jobs (and day-into-evening-and-onward-through-the-night families that many people come home to after the day job) suck up so much of one's time that it's impossible to find the space to create. But that doesn't necessarily equal less passion. I think our pervasive belief that "true artists" are hellbent on creating is a fallacy. I consider myself a true artist. Hell, I'll even give it capitals: I'm a True Artist. I'm a successful, self-supporting writer who until this past year juggled a full-time job, a family, grocery shopping and cats who barf on the carpet daily. About 1.5% of my free time was spent on writing. I loved the thought of it, but I was too fried to even think about doing it. Sometimes artists do need more time to produce the stuff they love.
Thanks for getting my wheels turning on this, Grace. (And you have a beautiful name.)
Posted by Alex on 02/07/2009 at 12:29am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Interesting post! As a colleague of mine in the illustration field has pointed out, art schools need to teach their students that they're not going out into the world to be artists, but entrepreneurs. Working artists don't need to suffer for their art, but they do need to know how to market their work, make connections and relate to their clients with professionalism and maturity.
Posted by fuentism on 02/06/2009 at 11:37am | permalink | Reply to this comment
This is a great post and I really hate that it is all true.
Posted by Beth Taylor on 02/06/2009 at 11:41am | permalink | Reply to this comment
I LOVE the part about bringing your art and creativity to your job. You're right. If you are truly creative, you are already doing this.
We need to be less afraid to use our own ideas to innovate in our jobs. If your job description hasn't changed to include your own ideas and you are mad about it, do something about it. Complaining doesn't help. Get better at selling your art –> To your boss.
This is something my generation seems to reject rather than embrace. We want to seperate our lives so much, it is stupid, really. Who I am, I am in my job and outside of it. And I use the knowledge I've earned for myself in my job. That's what experience is, after all. All of it relates if I choose to let it. Whether from my college degree or things I do online for my own "personal brand" or jobs I've had in the past. All this helps me be more creative and better at my job – IF I choose to apply it that way. It's my choice.
Posted by Tiffany Monhollon on 02/06/2009 at 11:55am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Penelope,
You make some good points in this post. I can't fully agree with you though because I used to be a starving desk jockey in a gray, boring cubicle. Now I'm a semi-starving, yet much happier person pursuing my passion for photography & design.
The key to being successful as an artist is to have an entrepreneurial mindset. For example, lets say you love taking abstract photographs, you do it well, and you're passionate about it. You might not make a living off taking the exact type of photos you're most passionate about, but that doesn't mean you can't take your skills in photography and apply it to other types of photography that will bring in some income (stock photography, private sales, commercial shoots, etc, etc).
Take what you love to do, and find a way to spin that into something that has a real potential to make money. That's how you make art for a living. With the internet, there's no reason you can't live off your art…unless, of course, you're a shitty artist or just plain lazy.
Posted by Smashbase on 02/06/2009 at 12:02pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Lots of great points but I can't agree with the art=sex comparison. Art takes a lot more time than sex if you're really an artist and feel the need to create all the time. If you only need a few hours than sure or on weekends then a regular job works. If not, make art into your career in any way you can even if you have to go from a regular job or a part time job and cut down til you can afford to make a living off your art.
Posted by Ashley on 02/06/2009 at 12:12pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Penelope,
I am a graphic designer who has wanted to draw comics since I was about ten years old. In addition to not being able to make art if you are starving, I find that I make very little art when I don't FEEL secure. My job is not my ideal job. However, my job gives me health insurance and enough money that I don't worry about money. I have really only had a decent job for about a year. I am not more determined to make comics now than I was before I got my decent job but I feel secure. I think it is largely because of this that I have produced about three times as many comic book pages last year than I did in the year prior.
Thanks for the perspective.
Posted by Robert Wilson IV on 02/06/2009 at 12:24pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
One of my favorite writers once said the key to writing a best selling novel is to have a job that doesn't require much mental energy but pays the bills. That way you had the psychic energy to go home and write. (Think you're too busy to do both?)
This post reminded me of the character in Amadeus — Sebailleus (spell?) — the one who believes he's brilliant … until he comes to know Mozart.
Posted by Juliette on 02/06/2009 at 12:33pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
I think you're trying to spell 'Sibelius' but he was a much later, Finnish composer.
The character you're referring to in 'Amadeus' is Anton Salieri.
Posted by Barry on 09/29/2009 at 08:25am | permalink | Reply to this comment
This is a great post. I do think there are some people who should disregard this advice, and become full-time artists and writers — but they'd do it anyway. They can't be persuaded otherwise.
The only people who should create art for a living are people who are compelled to do so, people who have no choice. Anyone who can be persuaded against it should be. Anyone who has other options for work should take it. Creating art for a living *sucks* as a job. You're better off at Wal-Mart.
The comedian Red Foxx was asked, near the end of his career and life, if he would have lived his life any differently if he could start over. He responded, "Yeah, I woulda gotten a job. I'd have been the funniest guy in the office and ate regular."
He was very successful — near the end of his career. He struggled at the beginning.
I knew a woman who was 22 years old, lives alone, and writes full-time. I suspect she has outside income, a trust fund or something like that. Her writing is extremely derivative and uninteresting. I think it's because nothing's *happened* to her. She has nothing to write about. If she got a job, she'd be out in the world, things would happen to her, and in 20 years or so she'd be a great writer. Because she would have a lot to write about.
Posted by Mitch Wagner on 02/06/2009 at 12:36pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
That first part of your comment is totally true — some people absolutely cannot be convinced by this post. But we each learn so much about ourselves by noticing where we totally won't budge.
Penelope
Posted by Penelope Trunk on 02/06/2009 at 01:24pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Penelope, thanks for the mention. I'm the Community Manager over at UpMo. Great commentary on networking as an artist. I think of my father who's a fairly well-known painter and the Chair of the Art Department at the University of Minnesota. Great networker and likable gentleman, and his sales reflect that even in the current economic downturn. I'd attribute a lot of his success to his genuine commitment to serve and not just take from his network. That quality helps build meaningful relationships and advocates who will support you in your career. I definitely encourage your readers to take UpMo's Network Readiness Evaluator and our Beta for a free spin.
Posted by Aswan Morgan on 02/06/2009 at 01:00pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
I agree with this post. My "art" is playing the guitar and singing. I was never good enough to earn a living doing it, but I do enjoy playing, mostly for friends and at parties and at the occasional open mic night at a local bar or coffeehouse. But most of all, I just like doing it, and I don't need any compensation because I consider it recreation, just a hobby.
I will say this – It's been my experience that having "art as a hobby" (especially playing a musical instrument) can help you advance socially and professionally, because it makes you a more interesting person and that improves your odds of professional success – so in that regard, there is a certain intangible benefit to it.
Posted by rah2869 on 02/06/2009 at 01:17pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
I am truly horrified that you actually consider what you do art. I usually do not see much value in the blogs you have but, I read them in hopes of a little more understanding of things I do not understand. In my book being an Artist sets you apart form the average person. It bestows a title upon you that indicated that you have a talent that can touch people hearts, make them laugh cry, think, etc. You my dear are more like Shawn Hannity. You do not seem to have any great talent just a knack. Sometimes a little funny, inflammatory, bad girl, etc. You do not bring anything to the table that has worth. You are just slightly entertaining.
Posted by James on 02/06/2009 at 01:29pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
"I am truly horrified that you actually consider what you do art. I usually do not see much value in the blogs you have but, I read them in hopes of a little more understanding of things I do not understand."
That's bullshit, James. You read this blog because you get off on being an online bully. If you sought therapy, you'd find other, healthier ways of sublimating the fact that you got beat up a lot when you were 8 years old.
Honestly, many of us got beat up a lot when we were 8. Really. There's no shame in it.
Posted by Mitch Wagner on 02/06/2009 at 02:36pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Who's Shawn Hannity? I'm familiar with a Sean Hannity.
Posted by Mark W. on 02/06/2009 at 11:14pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
I'm so glad to see I'm not the only one who feels this way. I am a musician, but I also have a full time job. Sometimes I run into people who feel I'm not a "real" musician, because I don't make all my money that way. But my day job allows me to make the music I want, so I don't have to join some cheesy cover band just to pay the bills. Well said, Penelope!
Posted by Susan on 02/06/2009 at 01:36pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Good post about "being real" and realistic all at once.
Posted by gregcnorca*AT*aim on 02/06/2009 at 02:04pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
You are right about everything in this post. Except this isn't entirely about people who want to be artists. Yes, when people want to be artists, they just make art, no matter what. I think what many people are asking when they ask this question is, "How can I be famous?"
Posted by Joselle on 02/06/2009 at 02:09pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
NO WAY! That dude is just jaded…I came from a school of artist who are BANKING out doing the exactly what they love. To give you an example, just from my graduating class, of people that I know personally, there are graphic designers, fine artists (yes fine artists), and illustrators working at (just to name a few more well know names)….
American Greetings
Cartoon Network
CNN
NBA Entertainment
Orlando Magic
Pfizer
The CIA
Toys 'R' Us
Trader Joes
And if you think your a bit tecky, I know computer animation students working at Disney, Pixar, Warner Brothers Digital…. the list goes on and on
Then if you get into Interior Design well you pick any major architectural firm in the world and guess who is a pivotal part of their staff…..Or to start you own firm like Kurt did. Kurt lives upstairs from our office in a 5 million dollar flat and drives a 2009 Bentley…
Every corporation and every small business needs branding (graphic design), most every major corporation, hospital, school and government institution has in house interior designers on staff, ever major cartoon in the past 10 has been animated digitally, every corporate web page has been designed. Every TV show and movie created has a creative director, set designer, costume designer ect…
In a world that is communicating increasingly by images via TV and internet, the need for artist and designer has NEVER BEEN GREATER! I mean when else in history could you go to target and buy a designer toilet brush and guess what someone is getting paid to design it.
My point is that if you want to be in a creative field there are a
PLETHORA of opportunities out there, more now than ever before but it is just like any other field, you have to work hard and be good at what you do and you’ll be fine!!!
the only way to fulfill the starving artist is if your
a.) lazy as hell
or
b.) really don’t care about money and therefore don't work to seek out one of the billions of opportunities in this world for creative people.
Posted by adriane on 02/06/2009 at 02:16pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
OK, I thought I was going to hate this post, then I ended up loving it. Especially the general idea that all our crazy efforts to BE artists can be the very things that defeat us, in the end. The "special studio," the "full-time focus," the angst and romanticizing the hardships — they can all bite you in the ass.
(Funny aside: I became very anemic years ago when my ex-husband was trying to "make it" as an artist and I was trying to support us on a reporter's salary at a crappy newspaper.)
Posted by Kristin T. (@kt_writes) on 02/06/2009 at 02:23pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
You had more than just a narrator. The way I recall it, Penelope, is you would write about what happened to you the week before, and the rest of us in the writing program would try to figure out which "character" each of us were. But they were good stories nonetheless, especially the dialog. I still miss getting new ones.
Posted by John on 02/06/2009 at 02:59pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
great post. i'm in my second year of a well-known graduate writing program and have full funding from the university so have all my time to write and it honestly hasn't made me more productive. having no structure makes me waste a lot of time. although my writing is doing well — being accepted to journals and winning a contest here and there — i am looking forward to getting part-time work that will allow me to clear my head and have an *outside focus*. i think i needed the writing workshop experience to konw that i don't need this to write and that i work best when i can follow my own nose & combine different elements of life and thinking. i now hate the romantic myth of the suffering artist and it's more importnat to me to have an active life and also have my private space to write in/out of. perfect circumstances are overrated and can end up being arid.
Posted by alex on 02/06/2009 at 06:28pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
so P how come you at bagels when you were dirt poor … here in Australia one bagel costs the same as a loaf of bread …. are we the centre of a great bagel rip off ??
at my worse finacial postion – $40 a week – I ate breadfast cereal – dry – for dinner – lasted about six months …. am pretty much off bfast cereal now … 24 years later …
and James you silly billy writting is art :) der !! le
Posted by le on 02/06/2009 at 07:29pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
"Real artists will make art no matter what." This reminds me of the answer Beckett gave a journalist who asked him why he became a playwright: "Bon qu'à ça" ("Good at nothing else").
Posted by Olivier on 02/06/2009 at 08:37pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
@John: you're right, P's posts are exceedingly memorable and 'on' lately, and I think it has to do with the frequency. She's in a groove.
@rah: being in writing workshops after work gives me a reason to get through the day, so I know how you feel about your music. 80% of the time my job is fine, but my life would not be as full without writing around the edges.
@James: please link to YOUR blog, on which you post at least twice a week. Writing well is an art.
For all the writers out there: my writing instructor just gave me a book – after my most recent rejection slip – called Letters to a Fiction Writer. Wonderful for perspective when you're tearing your hair out, and an homage to the effort of writing as a 'hobby'.
Penelope's post was pitch-perfect.
Posted by JC on 02/06/2009 at 09:48pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Penelope,
Here's the thing. You are simply a failed writer. And don't claim that your blog posts are art, please. They're barely blog posts, just rambling neurotic BS.
So, while an artist needs a day job, the ultimate goal would be to earn a living from your art, performance, writing, whatever. And YES, and artist absolutely derserves to be paid for what they do. Unfortunately in the United States artists are not respected as contributing anything of value to society, but they work their asses off and if you enjoy what they do, you cough up some of the money that you earn from your boring-ass day job that doesn't fulfill you.
So, this is advice that YOU might find comforting, but is certainly not to be shared with the world as a proper way to live.
Posted by Matt Klein on 02/06/2009 at 11:47pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
What makes P an artist? She calls herself one knowing full well that some people will retort that she is no artist. And knowing that other people will then rise to her gallant defense. All the while, her traffic (AKA marketability AKA mother's milk) continues to grow. She knows that a successful blog is not defined by depth or intelligence. The successful blog is the one that gets a reaction.
If she is an artist, it's at the clever use of provocative sophistry.
Posted by Dan on 02/07/2009 at 08:29am | permalink | Reply to this comment
That's exactly right. PT's claims to art are sort of a joke, but maybe she means them to be. I like her writing, and think that fiction would be a better field for her than anything else (I get the feeling she's been inventing stuff for a while).
But Matt–in the US successful artists are disrespected all the time–Stephen King, Thomas Kinkade, Steven Spielberg. Just because an artist and his work aren't popular with those who decide what's "really" art and what isn't, doesn't lessen the art. Starving artists are usually starving because their work is not popular, which often means it's not very good.
And finally–PT's notion that Picasso's work reflected his daily actions is very unsophisticaled. Was he bombing Spain when he painted Guernica?
Posted by Barbara on 2009-02-08 01:12:33 | (Comments wont nest below this level)
This post is so general I could I could wallow in "What's in the fridge" for weeks. You make no mention of learning to be a good coppyist, that starving promotes creativity and inventivness, that living in rural areas(nature) gets people to where they want to be without creating yet gives the inspiration to do so. What about mental health? What is the most common myth about art? That you have to be a bit off to be an artist. Yes I have said life is about creating yet dare I add that art is about creating life.
How about mentioning that all of the technology,media and
well written blogs that scare the livin daylights out of people -that they could ever create at all. That learning about raw materials and their use is elemental to good design. Are you saying art is worth trading for sex?
Given the above rantings I predict this to be one of your most posted blogs… How do you do it? I'm a big critical fan.
Posted by What am I going to be When I Grow Up on 02/07/2009 at 09:16am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Greetings Penelope and fellow Brazen Careerists,
This is my first time blogging, so forgive me if I appear to be rambling.
The very act of living day-to-day is an art. People have to be creative to maintain that delicate balance of responsibilities, indulgences, and ambitions. That is what I can conclude from this particular post.
Art is generally thought to be work that inspires a response in its audience. It is defined the way it is because of the broad range of experiences and resulting opinions that art generates. The blogosphere is an excellent example of art as it incorporates the written word.
All that said, as a struggling writer, I feel that what appears to be lost in this discussion are the more unusual factors of life that are out of our individual control. For instance, the current economic crisis. It has made that balance I mentioned before even more delicate, for me at least. And I am looking for as many possible solutions as I can. That is why I read this blog. After all, this is what "The Brazen Careerist" is all about, isn't it?
Posted by Stephen B. on 02/07/2009 at 12:43pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
"So if you think you're an artist and you are not making art now, but you think that in the right circumstance you'd make art, you are lying to yourself. I'm sorry. But it's true. Unless you are starving. If you are starving, see point number one: You need to get a job."
What about if you've made art in the past, you'll make it in the future, and you're not making it right now? There's not a single paradigm that fits the makeup of all 'artists'.
"Don't tell me it's crushing your soul. This whole blog is about how your soul does not depend on your job or your boss or your paycheck. Click on some links and read them."
Your soul may not depend on your job (as in, it can be supplied from other sources); and you may be able to change jobs. But it does not follow that your job cannot be crushing your soul.
"Also, most corporate jobs can be creative outlets because businesses solve problems."
Are you implying that artists solve problems?
"You are not a better artist if you can do it full time."
While I agree that the fact that you are 'making art' full-time does not mean that you are a better artist, it remains true that practice improves your work, and if you're making art full-time, you're getting a lot more practice time in.
"I don't want to see snooty comments on this post about how great you are for being able to support yourself with your art. Because I can do that too."
This whole post strikes me as a product of some kind of unmentioned personal insult.
"The days of discovering someone with a sawed-off ear in an insane asylum are over."
In what way are they over?
"Make art [...] Because you think you will die if you don't do it."
Is this the only way art can be formed? Why not make art for other reasons? Or are you perhaps exercising a bit of hyperbole here?
Posted by David on 02/07/2009 at 04:02pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Penelope,
Here is the best approach to creating art. I learned this long ago when I was in a band. You are in show business, you take care of business, so the show can go on. I worked with a lot of artists and bands mates who hated me saying that and never understood that they were in business, not in the arts.
The never took care of business and they ended up pissing away what they earned, always thinking there would be more and/or they would hit that next level, e.g. Soundgarden, Pearl Jam or Nirvana in sales. The unwillingness to accept they were in business also kept many of them blind that they peaked and were always going to play clubs and not arenas.
Picasso was a great example of a business man masquerading as an artist.
Posted by Sam "The Saint" on 02/07/2009 at 04:45pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
So true, I was always told to do something sensible not be artistic especially as I couldnt draw this was good advice. Unfortunately I ended up as an economist…
Posted by Toxic Brit on 02/08/2009 at 12:48am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Thanks. I needed that post and all the links to past posts. I've been writing again lately and I keep thinking that if I can use it to make extra money then I will finally be happy. But I realize that I'm writing because I need to write and if I'm going to make money off of it someday, I will need to learn more about business and develop my networking skills. I'm going to go take the UpMo quiz now.
Posted by Natalie on 02/08/2009 at 01:27am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Oh my god. A blog entitled "Brazen Careerist" attempting to make some sort of statement about art, and how to be an artist?????? Artists are not careerists. They are the exact opposite of careerists.
And you're so wrong. Yes, people need food and shelter–that's quite obvious, but many of our greatest writers and painters were living on the very margins of society and the farthest thing from affluent.
And the way in which you talk about "art" — that vagueness — points to the fact that you really don't know anything about "art" at all.
Posted by not an artist, but have been around many on 02/08/2009 at 02:16am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Yes I agree with some of your points, and disagree with others.
If you want to be an artist, you just need to create. Stop stuffing about, stop making excuses, just create.
The thing is though…… if you want a career out of making art, you do need to do it fulltime. I don't think as an artist I could give myself to my art if I wasn't. My whole mind, spirit, everything about myself is in every single mark I make, every single brush I pickup, every single character that I paint. It's not just about the networking or marketing, and I certainly don't think I'm any better then anyone else out there. I also don't think I create 'better' work then anyone either. I just have more time to devote to my art, and I can put more of my true self into it.
In this day and age the only way you can truly 'make it' as an artist is to treat it as a business. There are those who are lucky who can skid by on scholarships and grants. But there are others like me who instead has to approach their art from a practical business point of view. I make art, I get money from making my art.
At the end of the day if I don't get money, I can't eat, I have nowhere to live & then I'll die. Yes if I eat crap I'll get sick. But the reality is that most of the time I spend so much time worrying about how much longer I can keep my house for that those ill thoughts creep into my work and take over like a plague. Why should I have to go and get a part time job to supplement my income? Just so you don't think I'm up myself because I do this full time?
I might treat my art like a business, but I still scrape by every week in order to continue to do so. I think to have a career as an artist there is only one thing you need.
6) Be passionate about what you create Without passion, you might as well just be throwing paint on the sidewalk. There are those artists who are one night stands, but the others – the ones with the careers are those type of artists that will be doing what they do forever. If you really passionately, devotedly, insanely love what you do then you should aim to be the long time lover, and not the one night stand.
Posted by Ali J on 02/08/2009 at 03:20am | permalink | Reply to this comment
I love it.
Thanks for reminding us about how sweet this place is—I'm happy because I just landed here not long ago.
Dave
Posted by dave malone on 02/08/2009 at 11:54am | permalink | Reply to this comment
This is the 2nd post week about a path that someone should not do, first grad school, now art, and previously it was about writing a book. What I dislike about the posts is that you disguise them as absolutely never do this whatsoever so they look brazen but really their just a set of circumstances where you shouldn't do things. Don't go to grad school as an alternative to thinking about your career path. Get a game plan for being an artist and understanding what lends itself to a career in art.
Grad school and art are all viable career paths in the right circumstance but those don't make good material so instead let's make a dogmatic post about everything that is wrong.
My main problem with that, is that is not career advice which you state as your area of expertise. Anyone can tell someone not to do something. Yes, embedded in your posts is the advice on how to that someone can figure out by flipping around the how not to. But the angry delivery is intended to shock not advise.
Posted by Deadhedge on 02/08/2009 at 09:46pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Its so true that you have to be more than just good at your art. I have seen so many people mystified at their lack of success as they have amazing talent, but can't talk to a stranger to increase interest and ultimately sales.
I have to point out I also know an artist who does manage to avoid paying for anything. He has the cheapest rent in town and the biggest tax bill hanging over him.
Posted by Rhona on 02/09/2009 at 06:08am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Hi,
I am happy with the above information.
Thank You
Martin
Posted by martin on 02/09/2009 at 06:23am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Art is my form of relaxation. If I don't do it, I'm not going to get anything else done. That's just life, and I'm lovin' it.
Thanks for the boost…………….:)
Posted by LisaNewton on 02/09/2009 at 09:57am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Oh okay.
To be good at something such as playing music, dance, etc, you have to do it for 10,000 hours. About 4 years full time. Including weekends. But that's impossible, because according this article, you gotta have a mcjob during this time, right? so you're not called a parasite. So, let's make it 8 years at 3.5 hrs per day after the mcjob. That's the accelerated program. Wonderful. Only, who can do this for years and years? Oh, btw, do you know how much dance classes cost? The investment that artists put into their art is huge.
And then, the only way you will be making money, is if you don't injure yourself along the way, and land some commercial, steady gig, or teach (yey), because the come-and-go dance jobs that you will get will pay maybe for the actual time that you dance, if you're lucky for the rehearsals, but never will you get paid a commesurate amount for the insane amount of preparation that went into preparing your body for this point in your life where you can actually perform.
Are we ready to have a world without art?
Only crazy people make art into a career, because it is torture.
Posted by ioana on 02/09/2009 at 01:57pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
So, let's say you're only spending only 1.5% of your time on your art. Are you really an artist? Yes, if you have EVER produced art, and even if you get really busy and never produce another thing, I believe you are still an artist.
However, I question a person's commitment to his art if he is complaining about not having enough time for it but is still watching every episode of CSI in all its forms? I believe that passionate artists produce some kind of art on a regular basis, not just once in a while when the "mood" hits? I am concerned by those who say that they need more than what they have to produce anything.
Creative people work their art into their lives somehow.
Even if it just in responding to posts on a blog.
Posted by Grace on 02/09/2009 at 02:00pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
You can get distracted from their art, but ultimately, you will come back to it if you are an artist. I totally agree, Penelope.
In fact, the thing I notice the most with artists is that fact – the need to make art never goes away. It infiltrates her life, her thoughts, her day job. She will constantly think about giving it up because it sucks up the rest of her money, her time, and she's so tired. But she never can give it up, even if no one ever notices anything she does, or it is noticed negatively. For a while, she might work on some aspect of it – appearing to not be working ON it – but she is just honing some part of it. She may get mired in the details of the art – the selling, the promoting, the crafting, the costuming, the networking, the business of it – but the art will come back, pure and strong, washing away the details in the need to create the art. It's a disease, in some ways. Others might say it is like being a parent, with finished pieces as children from gestation to sending out into the world as an adult.
An Artist will BE an Artist, and will find a way to Be and Do the art, no matter if they have a job or not. Again, we are thinking on the same wavelength.
Posted by Lane on 02/09/2009 at 03:25pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
To comment on point #3: I think your assumption that real artists will make art no matter what is flawed. I think most art requires at least some sort of inspiration. Have you ever tried writing right after a broken heart (I read you were divorced)? I'm sure the words didn't have any problem spilling out.
I would be guilty if I said I hadn't toyed with the idea of moving to a studio somewhere in New York and trying to pursuing the dream. Living off of cigarettes and wine, throwing paint around until something eventually looks good enough to pass as "Modern" to earn enough money until next month.
Maybe, this romantic idea of becoming a starving artist is a result of a lot of great artists before them dying poor, but having their work considered genius after death. Or something like that.
I'm not entirely sure if anyone has said this yet because I didn't feel like reading the other posts. Also, I think I my argument got somewhat lost in there.
ps. How old are you? Didn't say on your page and I was just curious.
Posted by Alex on 02/10/2009 at 01:05am | permalink | Reply to this comment
I don't know…your job may not "be" your soul, but it can still crush it. Kinda hard to focus and innovate when you are slowly being pressed into fruit leather by an organization or profession's culture. That would make it difficult to create.
Posted by MJ on 02/10/2009 at 10:49am | permalink | Reply to this comment
For anyone who's reading down this far and is still interested in this topic. I'll give you my $.02.
I'm not sure what the median age of the reader of this specific post is. Outside of regular readers – I would guess that the primary readers are a. people who are out of undergrad – working a day job and are here because someone forwarded a link of encouragement or b. people who have artistic pasts (and presents) and balance that with another income. This post is more for those of you who are recently out of college, facing massive debt and doubt – because I've been there myself.
This will probably be a long post, but I am putting it here, because this is information that would have helped me immensely after school, and perhaps it will help you.
In music, the specific example that is often given of this balance is the American composer Charles Ives. Ives lived in musical obscurity at the beginning of the 20th century and wrote some of the most challenging music imaginable. While little of it was played in his lifetime, Ives would go on to become one of the most influential composers of the 20th century. Aside from his musical work, he was also the vice president of an insurance agency and continued to write and work for much of his life. Add the fact that very few people recognized the genius of his work during his lifetime, that much of his music was never played an you have a classic story of artistic struggle.
Until you read any one of his biographies and get to the part of his life where one night he came down the stairs of his home crying and said, "I can't do this anymore." For the last 20 years of his life, he never wrote another note of music.
While this blog has some really solid advice, the one thing that is inferred, but not said explicitly is that art takes time. There are technical skills required to create any kind of art – and the maintenance and advancement of those skills takes concentrated and focused time. The core question at work here seems to be "What are my priorities?"
A temporary diversion – one thing to consider in an arts education – formal or informal – is that many artists focus on the "how" of their art but not the "why". The importance of this issue can not be overstated. If you have a solid understanding of why you do the things you do, then the issue of how will be more easily resolved.
As an example of priorities, if you find that you're spending more time at the bar with friends then you are working on your art – your priorities are telling you something. For some people, this is merely an issue of time management. But for some people their priorities are out of whack with their perception of reality.
If your concept of why you create art is clear, then a day job is nothing more than a vehicle for income while you work on your art, and the challenge is in utilizing the elements of the day job that work for you.
I will use a personal example. Please realize that I am a very self-depreciating person so anything that I write about myself is stated as factual and not self-aggrandizing.
I am an instrumentalist. I attended prestigious art schools at both the undergraduate and the graduate level. I have performed on both American and world premiers of guitar literature, have national and international tours under my belt and have performed with some of the best musicians on the planet. In short, I'm not a clown or a hack. I know what I'm doing.
Several years ago, I was several years out of my undergrad school and playing a GB (General Business – like a cover band) gig. You see, the thing about making money playing music, is that most of the gigs that pay – are gigs like this one. While you will run in circles with people who can't play their way out of a paper bag, you will also find extraordinary musicians with major credentials playing at the same crappy bar as you because – it's a paying gig.
So in this story were playing cheesy music I loathed in some dive restaurant in the middle of nowhere for people who didn't care. At this point in my life, I was completely despondent. I was working a day job for benefits and to pay off my school loan, and doing this gig on weekends to keep my chops up and I just felt awful. It suddenly occurred to me, "Wait a minute. Why do I feel this way? The whole reason I started playing music was because it felt good, and now every time I pick up my instrument I just feel bad. I don't EVER want to feel this way when I play music."
And so I quit. I figured that I would work hard, pay off my school debt and do something else with my life. But the things in life that are important to you stay inside of you, even in their absence. It took a while, but I started realizing that the things that were causing me such pain was the fact that I had lost my connection to my instrument. I couldn't quit music – because music had become an integral part of who I was. I could get rid of music no more than I could get rid of my skin.
So I kept my job. And then got one that paid better. I played in a lot of local bands that paid nothing, but because I had a day job IT DIDN'T MATTER that it paid nothing. I played the music, because I enjoyed the music. I decided that, for me, the best balance would be teaching music in a college environment. Teaching was something that I did well. It allowed me to give back to beginning musicians and it would give me the flexibility to pursue my music on my own terms. To do this, I needed a master's degree. I worked hard, and got a scholarship to a well regarded school on the opposite coast of where I lived. I got my degree this past May. I got another gig and another day job to pay bills and now keep sending out resumes and working towards that goal. Was going to grad school in my mid 30's an easy thing to do? Not at all. It was a culture shock and a calculated gamble. But it was necessary for what I wanted to do in the long run.
So I can't say, "don't waste your money on grad school". Even though I had a scholarship, and was working – I still had to take out loans to cover the difference. My advice is if you DO go to grad school have a VERY clear idea of what it is you want to do with that degree.
I'm married, so also realize that my priorities are different than they were 20 years ago. If someone came up to me at 17 and said, "Hey we have a rock band and we're going on tour. We have no idea about money or food or where we'll sleep but you will be able to play in front of people every night for the next couple of months." there's no question I would have gone. But once you start working with issues like rent, and bills – money becomes an issue. Once you start waking up on strange people's floors to the house pet eating its own vomit several inches away from your face – accommodations start to become more of an issue.
I could get a cruise ship gig and make enough money to pay bills. But I know now that that type of gig is not for me. Many of the paying opportunities that come to an artist will require doing things that you might not want to do. If you understand the WHY of what you do, those issues will be easier for you to grasp.
One final observation along this issue of why. Realize that some people are artists and some are artisans. And here's how I make that distinction.
To me an artisan is a person with a high technical skill set who enjoys the physical activity associated with that skill. For example, my mom is a tolle painter. She would be perfectly happy to paint the same items over and over again – because she enjoys the act of painting. As a musician friend of mine said, "I don't care what I play – I just want to play the guitar."
An artist by contrast is someone who enjoys the physical activity associated with creation. To the artist, painting the same flower over and over is an anathema to their existence. The WHY of their art is based in discovery.
I don't know if this helps any of you. I have strong feelings about this because I've been able to do both for a while and am finally moving towards being able to synthesize the two.
If you can walk away from this post with only one piece of advice – try this one: Life is a marathon and not a 50 yard dash. There will be times that you want to give up, times that is goes easy and times of incredible difficulty – but know that if you have the long term goals in sight – that will be what keeps you going. If you go into a marathon with a 50 yard dash mentality you're going to crack at the first real hardship. As Bukowski once said, "Endurance is more important than the truth."
Good luck. Be your own critic. Be your own cheering section. Be aware where your perception is myopic and never give up.
-Scott
Posted by Scott on 02/10/2009 at 02:44pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Scott, I just want to say thank you so much for your inspiring words. I really needed to hear them today.
Posted by mia on 02/18/2009 at 09:21am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Hi Mia,
Glad it helped.
I was watching the end of a marathon on TV once and I saw that one of the contestants had soiled themselves right before the finish line. Just remember, in any contest the winner is often the last person standing and not how much elegance they exhibit in struggle.
In life, the things that are important to us are the things that we do. If your art is important to you – you'll find a way to make it – even if the compromises you have to make are messy.
If possible though, try not to soil yourself.
Good luck!
Posted by Scott on 2009-02-18 11:51:43 | (Comments wont nest below this level)
I must say, though I like the no-nonsense tone of this post, it also makes me laugh because you utterly romanticize the art-making process as something one "has to do."
And while to a certain extent that is true, treating your art-making as a job, makes you better as an artist, and more ready to accept the "luck." that comes your way.
As far as a job's inability to be soul-crushing, that is a topic for another time…personally, from my limited scope, I just gave notice at one to start an unpaid internship in radio…I am looking to the future, living of savings in the hopes that be devoting myself to my art, and a career class with the potential to evolve, I am embarking on my own hero's journey (I've been reading Campbell again too).
Either way though, this post does touch on one thing, art though it is often a labour of love, in order to be taken seriously must be a job too.
It is not about making something solid once, its about doing it twenty times, then convincing others of its veracity. It is a job.
Posted by madeleine on 02/11/2009 at 11:46am | permalink | Reply to this comment
I'm late to this post but glad I found it. You put it very well Penelope. I expected to hate this post and I didn't.
@jrandom Thanks for the Harry Chapin, a magician himself, he says it very well here…
"Music was his life, it was not his livelihood,
and it made him feel so happy and it made him feel so good.
And he sang from his heart and he sang from his soul.
(And) he did not know how well he sang; It just made him whole."
I need to go find my Chapin collection and relisten. I could use some comfort in this economy.
Posted by Diana on 02/11/2009 at 03:21pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
I spent 15 years as a starving artist, several of them with children and occasionally homeless. I would not do it again, but I'm not in my 20's anymore so why would I?
That said, I think art is very subjective and cannot be grasped at so broadly. I don't call myself an artist anymore and have no real desire to create for a living, but I have great respect for those who do devote their life to their passion. I choose not to denigrate their efforts.
Yesterday my son told me I should have been a professional actor. I told him I gave up on that (after several years of training) because I needed to feed and clothe him, but thanks for the compliment.
Posted by curiously random on 02/14/2009 at 08:35pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
There is something I think this list assumes, though, and that is the idea that a career of art-making is often both desirable and possible. I completely agree that it isn't necessary, and that people who truly need to make art need to evaluate if it is really vital they do it as a profession or not. But the fact is that doing great art takes a time commitment that is hard to do if you also have a full-time career. I think the bigger problem I tend to see among artists is their attitude about art as a BUSINESS. It is all too often part of the 'artist counter culture' mentality to buy into the idea that it's cool NOT to be a good business person and that to be one is selling out as an artist. This is crap. If you want to make a living as an artist, you MUST be both. Making a business of your art is often MORE work than having a regular career and making art purely as food for your soul and psyche, but for some people that type of success — just like those of us who make a career out of tech startups — is necessary in order to feel accomplished in their art. That's fine, but they need to recognize that success as an artist requires understanding the business of art, and that's a whole different skill set than the art-making. And if you can't or do not want to do that part of it then, yes, follow Penelope's advice and do it out of love around a day job.
Posted by Alora on 02/15/2009 at 04:26pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
@Alora
Hi, I think the problem for some of us (artists) is that the skills needed for business often are not in our repertoire, or mine anyway. It's not a matter of thinking it beneath me to be businesslike in my venture as an artist (I envy those artists who have both skillsets. It's that business doesn't come naturally to me any more than science does. It's harder to wrap my mind around business than art, music and literature.
Also, I am not an extrovert, and business takes a lot of selling (I read all the artists' marketing blogs too). I get anxious when it comes to selling. And I don't think selling is selling out. I just have a hard time doing it. I tried door to door Fuller Brush sales when I was a teenager. I was awful! No one is probably old enough to remember what Fuller Brush was, but it was sort of like selling vacuums or encyclopedias door to door. Maybe it created a life-long phobia! LOL
I'd like to hear from some other artists if they agree that we are not snobbish about selling, just not very good at it. I would gladly PAY someone to do it for me, if I could afford it!
Posted by Diana on 02/15/2009 at 04:43pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Artists have dealers. Don't be naive.
Posted by Bleakspot on 03/05/2009 at 05:49pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
What is Art? Art is a window washer.
Posted by Mickey Van Roo on 02/16/2009 at 09:00pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
I agree with the commenter that said #3 is a fallacy. There are many, many factors that might and do prevent people from making art at any given time. Many artists have had long dormant periods and phases of life where they did not create.
The test for being an artist IMO is not whether you make art at any given period of time but whether you are driven and compelled by the artistic/creative impulse. What constitutes being an artist is clearly subjective, so your definition need not match mine. But I'd hesitate to present your definition as a universal one.
Posted by m on 02/19/2009 at 12:48am | permalink | Reply to this comment
No offense Penelope, but where was this kind of content when you wrote over at Yahoo? I'm shocked that this is coming from the same person. This is an insightful, even-handed post that includes great advice and some great philosophizing.
Awesome. Can't wait to see more.
Posted by Writer's Coin on 02/25/2009 at 07:48am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Great post! Thank you a lot!
Posted by Oleksandr Photography on 02/27/2009 at 07:01pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Basquiat's life a crack house horror film?
Give me a break. You don't know anything about Basquiat then. Pick up a book and do some research. He was raised by decent, middle class people, in a good neighborhood. Lived on the streets for a very little time before making it.
He always had a place to go. Always had friends.
His work deals with hatian voodoo and the economic times, not crack.
Please respect the artist, don't just use him as folly for your lame points.
Ari
Posted by Ari on 02/27/2009 at 07:49pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
You are so absolutely right. I keep telling my clients who think "real artists" don't have day jobs that once you start making creative decisions through your business checkbook, you aren't an artist anymore, you are an art marketer. Nothing wrong with that, but if you want to be an artist, you may have to get a day job. Then you can make art decisions about art.
We don't FIND meaning in life, we MAKE meaning in life with out art. And that's the difference between artists and wannabees. If you don't have a choice about making art, you will do just as you said–make art anytime, anyplace, for any reason. Good for you!
Posted by quinncreative on 02/28/2009 at 11:56am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Thank You.
Posted by Kevin on 03/02/2009 at 06:36pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Kevin! I just found Cool Cake Photography… Your site IS art! Love it. You have a special way of approaching love in your photo galleries. Very cool.
Posted by Diana on 03/05/2009 at 06:06pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Thank you Penelope!!!!!!!!
I have to tell you that this is a life-changing post! I am an artist who has had all of those jealous feelings. I do have friends with trust funds who do art for a living – now, of course, they make from $4,000 to $90,000 a painting – but they are great networkers (some of them with their parents' friends, of course) and have been at it for a while – I know they did not start there.
I had six kids and didn't even finish art school because I quit my senior year to have my first – really dumb move – but these six kids were something I had to do, like art, and now they're grown and I adore them all and I'm finally thinking I'll have time for my art (see my last blog post if you have a sec) (http://www.mamagalen.blogspot.com/).
Now, I'm unemployed, doing freelance graphic design, and yearning, dreaming, wishing to do my art. Frustrated at the job hunt. Frustrated that my friends don't have to job hunt… Now, because of your eloquent, revelatory epistle to artists like me (like us), I feel liberated to just do it – whether the MOMA waits for me or not. Hell, I think I'll paint something today. As soon as I'm done with some freelance and some job hunting. Screw the dishes. I'm painting.
I love you.
mamagalen
Posted by mamagalen on 03/03/2009 at 08:44am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Maybe they sell their paintings because they create things that are pleasing to others, who then wish to own these. Maybe they have websites with more than one lone entry.
Posted by Bleakspot on 03/05/2009 at 05:53pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Wow! This is exactly what I needed to hear. I have been struggling with this concept for years. You are so right. If you love something do it, but it doesn't have to be what you do for a living.
This article might of just saved another 5-10 years of confusion.
This is getting printed and going right on my wall!
Posted by Erica on 03/04/2009 at 01:51pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
mamagalen – Totally agree! I also think that all art should be all done half-assedly.
Posted by ioana on 03/04/2009 at 01:58pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Wonderful post.
I have, on and off during my life, been a self supporting artist. It was not until I became a businessman that I enjoyed the fruits of being an artist, making more that enough for just a cup of coffee.
This will probably be of little consolation to a writer. However I think the principles apply.
My first several thousand dollar commission (over 25 years ago) was blown inside of 6 months. My last big commission, (over 54K), well, I am still living in the money so to speak. It was the down payment on my almost paid off house.
I think it was that once I started to collect collectors that I finally made it. Unfortunately, I left the biz to pursue other goals in life.
Now it is much harder to get back. Even so, as a business man, I work out my theories. One such landed me 12 sales of my sculptures, directly to a gallery and in New Hope of all places. Then the market went south for me again.
On to a new theory.
And even if I hit it dead on it does not guarantee success. One of my pieces has nailed a certain market segment dead on, everyone loves it. Only thing, it has not sold. In the end, I am not a good enough marketer….well, so far.
Finally, learning frugality has helped me through the lean times. Brown rice has a lot more health benefits than bagels. Oh yea, for iron, use black strap molasses. We use it in the hospital to build up anemic patients that refuse blood transfusions. (I am also a nurse when I am not an artist, its was one of those other things, thing.).
Also, I buy as many canvases and supplies as I can when killer sales come along. This gives me enough supplies to last lean times like these. I also buy from people who have had to give up trying.
Then, perhaps the ultimate form of prostitution for some artist, I started creating prints. I went one step farther. I create limited edition miniature prints. They are the size of a business card. I started selling them at $1 each. They are up to $2.50.
I could not ever bring myself to begging for money. I could sell on of my prints to who ever. Actually a few thousand prints to who ever I meet.
Hey, now I can always trade for a cup of coffee. Actually about 10,000 cups counting the ones I have yet to do.
At the least, when someone cannot afford a 6K painting, they can afford $2.50 for my miniature.
Then just to insure my career is safe from not being able to afford to work, I started photography. It costs nothing to do a digital proof till I find one that can sell.
The big commissions are very few and far between but are very enjoyable when they come along.
And I keep working on new theories of how to run my business, make money, put food on the table and be an artist. Maybe one day I will get it right, hit it off and actually have fame and fortune for 27 seconds into the future.
As to the starving, maybe I should give it a try. I really need to lose about 85 lbs.
The problem is, I am so busy right now that I have no time to work on my website and get it selling for me.
I need to go and have a cup of coffee, figure out how I will make enough to pay the bills this month and if there is any time left, think about making some art.
Up till recent years I have always said that if nursing ever got too stressful I could always fall back on being an artist.
In the current economy, perhaps I will have to fall back on being a nurse.
Cheers.
Posted by Jonathan of UlteriorArt.com on 03/10/2009 at 12:28pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
I did a google search for 'how to make a career as an artist' and this was the first thing that came up… Thanks it was an interesting read, and you said a lot of true things in there. The most successful photographers I know are exceedingly good with networking, and their people skills are fantastic. Have you ever read Orwell's Keep the Aspidistra Flying? It has an excellent portrayal of the whole 'starving artist' condition, the protagonist severely isolated and insular, barely managing to live in a squalid flat, and too hungry to write anything… It seemed relevant to what you were saying :)
Essentially the truth is that one creates because one is compelled to, whatever medium it be, and I know that for myself a life without imagination and creativity is only half an existence. Without art I just exist, I'm not fulfilling any potentials, or expressing myself in any meaningful way. Career is a secondary concern compared to that.
Thanks for putting your views out there, it was good to refresh my perspective! :)
x
Posted by Wesley Freeman-Smith on 03/11/2009 at 06:50pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
When he was in his teens, my husband painted his own surfboards. Then his friends wanted theirs painted. Then people he didn't know wanted theirs painted by him. So it went – he was doing something he loved that people were begging for, and they were willing to pay for it.
Now he paints paintings and we sell licenses for people to use his paintings for their products (like Converse shoes, beach towels, boogie boards, etc.) We make a good living off of his art, and it's the only work he's done in over 20 years. His art supports us and our son.
I felt your post was a little bitter that you couldn't make it as an artist and so no one else should. Well, the world needs art. Imagine your clothing without it being designed by an arist, or advertising, or just about ANY and EVERY product you buy – it was designed by an artist. And these people should be paid for their work.
One person responded to your post that artists can make money, as long as they create art that people WANT. That's truly the key – if no-one wants your art, you will not make it. And many times, even if they do, you won't make it unless you know how to think like a business person when selling your art.
Most artists who are "starving" aren't doing what they should to sell their art. They look at it as something special rather than as a business. No matter what you do for a living, whether you write books or paint paintings or make music, you need to treat it like a business. Even if it's art. Otherwise, you'll fail and you'll have to get some job you hate.
My vision is that all artists find their way to create art, do what they love, and get paid for it. I see a world where that is possible……
Posted by spunk brophy on 03/18/2009 at 08:48pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Wonderful article!
Building Career is an art. Only creative people could build a professional career!
Posted by وظائف خالية on 03/19/2009 at 07:57pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Pardon me, but you're calling these posts art? Get real. Writing well is a skill, not an art. Atwood is an artist with words, Jasper Fforde is an artist with words, Stephen King is an artist with words. You, Penelope, are not an artist with words. A a skilled and persuasive writer, sure; artist, no.
Just because you have a successful blog doesn't mean you're an artist. It means you are a skilled writer who knows how to get readers. Grisham is a bestselling author, but his connect-the-dots-plotted books aren't art.
Volume of readers does not convert skill into art. I write kick ass technical documentation, and people in several countries read and use my documentation. That doesn't make me an artist. The novel I'm working on, maybe that will earn me the label of artist, but I'm not quite there yet.
And regarding art being dictated by your surroundings: really now? In that thought you completely discount creativity. Did Tolkien write about what he knew about firsthand? I've been to England and haven't met any Orcs. Dr. Seuss? Stephen King? Carl Sagan? Just because you didn't have the vision to write anything other than lonely stories when you were lonely doesn't mean that other creative types suffer the same lack of vision and creativity. In fact, I've always found that the 99% of people who only write from personal experience are not, in fact, creative writers, but misguided autobiographers, at best.
Posted by Sam on 04/10/2009 at 12:53am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Well, but an artist too has to live from something. I am doing oil paintings since years and have to admit, most of my income results from direct painting orders on a specified theme. But was that not the income source of most famous painters in the past too?
Posted by Gifts Occasions on 04/13/2009 at 12:26pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
THis was rather interesting. FIrst of for the writer, Whoever you really are, it's appreciated enough that you can create a bog that I can find answers to my problems. You are useful to all of us. After all you create responses so you are worthy.
And for the topic of art, Some of us just have to be artists. Its NEVER good to discourage any one's dreams. Life is short, if i prefer to struggle,go hungry, die trying over something I love..It's still my preference. WHY? I am not crazy. I will do anything for what I love.
Its always better to talk about experiences, rather than telling others what to do. WHen be can bring our experiences together, we can find answers.
Since I was small, I was trying my hands at art, designing clothing for my barbie doll and singing for hours in the bedroom,getting addicted to cameras and pianos…..then sometimes hardship comes where I have to spend my time as a student studying hard or I wont pass that exam, and I missed my art so badly..Up to this day I am still studying something not related to art..International relations, and because art is important to me,, it stayed with me throught all the times when I am stressed out doing what I dont Love doing. Now i can see my life running out,,and I wished for a studio where I can paint, or a stage where I can air my concerts, bUt I never got to develop them because I am still spendin my time doing what I dont love,,and I am feeling regrets about this. I never had the money to study what i love, I got grants and scholarships to study academic subjects that contributed towards my country. If i only had the money I would have put y every second into art, all of it, and become someone recognized. And maybe there are wanna be's out there but a true artist knows that he is bu the way he feels, and anyone can know how much money they can make by evaluation their potential. Its the artist decision and no one should discourage anyone or any artist to not do what they love.
Posted by Isia on 04/15/2009 at 06:11am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Very interesting post. I decided to learn to be a graphic designer instead of pursuing being an artist, because I was afraid of what you went through. It's easier to make money as a designer instead of make a sales of your art. I make enough money to support my self, and design is a creative career even though I have to bend my creative thought with clients' needs.
I've been painting here and there, wanting to do some more with it. I am getting sick of my day job, and seeking the way to create art freely. I have to keep working on my day job, so it may take a while to build my art portfolio. Yet, I realized that it is making me way more happier to pursue my passion.
Posted by doronjo on 04/18/2009 at 11:56am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Build career as an artist?
I must loved it first then i will do my best to make my dream comes true
Posted by hedge on 05/09/2009 at 04:56pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Good comment, hedge.
Posted by Jason on 07/22/2009 at 03:10pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
making as an artist is so very dificult, but its the glamour of the whole profession that atracts alot of people
Posted by mr luggage on 06/07/2009 at 08:26pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
I worked with a lot of artists and bands mates who hated me saying that and never understood that they were in business, not in the arts !
Posted by Matt Green on 08/27/2009 at 01:41pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
You are right in saying that yours was not a friendly post.
Maybe cynical too. This is not a friendly comment either. Maybe cynical too.
You see, although on some level, in a parallel universe in a different time do agree with you in some twisted way, your words leave me with just one thought. This of course begs the question, have we met before in some other existence. I am happily married and believe me, this is not flirting. But I am curious if the other me has met the other you. I digress.
Have you ever heard of the Fox and the Grapes. It is an Aesops Fable. We condemn the things in life we cannot reach. There may be another answer.
The grapes only taste good when they are in season and are ripe for picking. Like grapes, making a living with art may be seasonal for some people.
What you failed to understand is that there are artist and there are successful artists. I do not know of any starving artist. All artists I know are either overweight and out of shape, very successful or not currently practicing artists. The successful artists are in the business of collecting collectors.
Even writers who are successful are in the business of collecting collectors. In other words, successful artist are business people.
There are unsuccessful entrepreneurs. Do we call them starving entrepreneurs? No. They are just unsuccessful. Whether failures or not depends on how they look at it.
Me, my philosophy is everything is a win. So, to get into the show I just did on short notice this weekend past, cost me about $150 and to travel across three states. Even if not making a dime it would have been a learning experience. I did not do as good as I hoped to but I did learn a lot. Next year I should do double and get about 4 times the residual sales.
Not getting paid for creating art. Things that make you go hmmmm. Lets carry this thought out. The vast majority of folks do not get paid for sex and enjoy it. My mechanic loves working on cars. Should he not get paid for it? I would love that although he would not be able to do it for long.
And my wife has a hair dresser who loves hair and anything to do with it. She should not get paid for it. Although I think she is better at coloring than I am, my wife still prefers me. Oh yea, I don't get paid for that either. Actually, my wife does not pay me for the art I create that hangs in our house as well.
As for your choice of words, one of which must have come from your mouth, I would not have in my hand with out a latex glove to protect it, unless it was dried and I was in a cow pie throwing contest. Well, no wonder you starved.
As to art emanating from a black hole of choice. This is one of my favorite debates to hate. My camera man in a video commercial I produced that was shot in Long Island, dreams of doing something from the farthest reaches of his inner horror loving soul. However, to just talk to him you would never know he is a closet horror lover. He is one of the kindest people and brilliant artist, not starving and somehow has an affordable rent in New York City.
As to being a real artist and making art no matter what, well, you must not be familiar with right brain vs left brain thinking. My best commission single (occasionally manic depressive and restless) was only 7K. Since being blissfully married, my best commission was over 50K (of course it was a monument work). I could not have made the big piece of art no matter what. It required 6 months and lots of someone else's money.
As a matter of fact, money has always been an inspiration. I am not a great artist. But money does inspire me in numerous ways and on numerous levels. I do believe it can help create art. Taking this to the absurd, I cannot paint with out paints that cost about $30 per tube and my big canvases cost about $150. Tried stretching them early on. Over stretching makes them a bit funky and warped. Hey, maybe I need to change the name of that early one. Thanks. It shall be called Early Warp In Green. No, just Warped Green. Wow, the creative juices are flowing thanks to you. But then this is a left – right brain thing.
Quitting your day job is essential if your great or if you want to be. If your so so, then work away. Nothing will get the creative juices flowing, at least for me, like working with out a safety net. But then, my 2nd most favorite book was the best selling, "Innovators Solution." It is a book on the theory of how markets work. It is considered the Bible of Market Theory.
Let see,that book was the reason for quitting nursing and becoming a self supporting artist. Also, that book resulted in selling 14 pieces outright to to a New Hope PA gallery rather than the typical putting them on consignment.
Of course they were my first 14 pieces. Way undersold them but hey, I still made a lot of money.
Don't get me wrong. I was not always an Atlas of the Art Marketing self supporting artists world. I was at one time the equivalent of a 97 pound weakling. Bullies used to kick up copies of Thomas Kinkade in my face at the beach on the weekends.
Those were horrible days. The 7K commission mentioned above won a national interior designers award. Do you think I got another job from it. Nope. However it did launch an industry doing work like mine in all the restaurants around the world. I was not a businessman. I was an artist. Not a successful artist, only one who made a lot of money.
Turns out the 14 pieces I sold, there were ones I did not sell. Well, they just sold this past Sunday in November (09) for between 4 to 10 times what he paid me. Lets see, the six hours of the show resulted in about $3336 in sales. Oh yea, they fed me too. They even fed my wife. On top of that, we got sandwiches for the trip home.
Just a side note here. I did not make $600 per hour at this show. Someone asked how long it took to create one of my pieces. I said 15 years. So, figuring the time I spent learning how to be a businessman and the art of not being a starving businessman and adding that into the mix, I actually only made an hourly wage. I figure my pay should be more than what I make as a specialist nurse. Any extra over the hours it took to create the work gets divvied up. I pay my book keeper (my wife) and my tax accountant (my wife), my cleaning lady (my wife and I am her assistant) and my secretary ( my wife) and my salesman who gets about 10 % (me and occasionally my wife).
Since she also has a job, this is extra money for her. She has not decided what she will buy with her cut just yet.
Also some of the money is set aside for paid days off and sick days. I also put some aside for my paid vacation. I am up to four weeks paid vacation now. Of course, if the sales drop, I may have to do like many businesses and make cut backs. The first perk to be cut back will be the four week paid vacation time off. I may gripe and complain about the cutbacks but in the end, I know that they will be important for the success of my not being a starving artist.
Also there is health insurance, dental and eye not to mention unemployment insurance. Most entrepreneurs are not aware that there is unemployment insurance for if you should have to fire yourself or lay yourself off. It is a program managed by most local banks. Just go in and ask about it. It goes by the name, Saving Account.
So, if I am making $600 per hour then I will not have anything left over for these other expenses. But if I make a fair and decent wage, not only will these be covered, there will also be money for advertising and putting back into the business.
In the case of this show, it only cost me 12% commission. But again, the pieces sold for way more than I would have sold them to the gallery owner.
I guess this speaks to your comment on needing to be a businessman. Here I thought I had to lower the price and consider them lost leaders in my attempt to collect art collectors. In reality, I needed to charge four times the amount (and actually make money for my time and a profit for my business) and as such, increase their value.
The last comment I agree with. I know a lot of better artist than I am who do not get paid for what they do. I would like to know how good of a networker I am but the creative mind, perhaps an artist who created the UpMo test has sold out. Now a commercial concern owns the name and is making money from the concept.
Oh yea, the grapes are actually delicious. The only thing, you can only eat them in season. You may have to find other things to eat in the off season.
Best wishes and how ever you fare, may you fare will.
Posted by Jonathan of JonathanSteeleWorks.com on 11/23/2009 at 06:58pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Ugh, making money as an artist. Horrible, the bottom line is money is such a powerful thing that it will sway objectivity in art, as well as arise emotion out of a human either good or bad. With that being said. Make money, and make art… Not make money while making art. :) _A
Posted by Aaron Petz on 01/23/2010 at 06:23pm | permalink | Reply to this comment
Could this ever happen in my life?
Posted by Mp3 Rocket Pro on 01/26/2010 at 01:27am | permalink | Reply to this comment
Treat art the same way, and you will stay sane.
Posted by FatBurningFurnace on 01/26/2010 at 01:27am | permalink | Reply to this comment