<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conflict of interest doesn&#039;t apply to blogs (another reason newspapers are dying)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/05/28/conflict-of-interest-doesnt-apply-to-blogs-another-reason-newspapers-are-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/05/28/conflict-of-interest-doesnt-apply-to-blogs-another-reason-newspapers-are-dead/</link>
	<description>Advice at the intersection of work and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:54:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Career Advice: Penelope Trunk is a Charlatan &#124; Danilo Campos.blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/05/28/conflict-of-interest-doesnt-apply-to-blogs-another-reason-newspapers-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-213157</link>
		<dc:creator>Career Advice: Penelope Trunk is a Charlatan &#124; Danilo Campos.blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2679#comment-213157</guid>
		<description>[...] say something about them, Trunk says, there&#8217;s no real reason to disclose that. That&#8217;s for newspapers. You should just trust that she&#8217;s making money from smart companies, and that makes it all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] say something about them, Trunk says, there&#039;s no real reason to disclose that. That&#039;s for newspapers. You should just trust that she&#039;s making money from smart companies, and that makes it all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On The FTC New Guidelines On Blogs And Disclosure &#124; The Definitive Dmbosstone</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/05/28/conflict-of-interest-doesnt-apply-to-blogs-another-reason-newspapers-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-210473</link>
		<dc:creator>On The FTC New Guidelines On Blogs And Disclosure &#124; The Definitive Dmbosstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2679#comment-210473</guid>
		<description>[...] a really good point that conflict of interest is different for bloggers than traditional media- we have much more to lose by recklessly selling out: So we don’t need stupid rules about conflict of interest for people who are putting themselves [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a really good point that conflict of interest is different for bloggers than traditional media- we have much more to lose by recklessly selling out: So we don’t need stupid rules about conflict of interest for people who are putting themselves [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/05/28/conflict-of-interest-doesnt-apply-to-blogs-another-reason-newspapers-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-207126</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2679#comment-207126</guid>
		<description>Bad news

http://consumerist.com/5374617/ftc-says-bloggers-cant-hide-endorsement-deals

Bloggers can&#039;t hide endorsement deals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad news</p>
<p><a href="http://consumerist.com/5374617/ftc-says-bloggers-cant-hide-endorsement-deals" rel="nofollow">http://consumerist.com/5374617/ftc-says-bloggers-cant-hide-endorsement-deals</a></p>
<p>Bloggers can&#039;t hide endorsement deals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey D.</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/05/28/conflict-of-interest-doesnt-apply-to-blogs-another-reason-newspapers-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-206992</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2679#comment-206992</guid>
		<description>Penelope,

Did you see the FTC is requiring bloggers to be transparent in product mentions?  This made me think about your post (above) earlier this year.  I didn&#039;t even know that the FTC considered the blogosphere as part of its domain.  Thought you might be interested.   --Jeffrey

FTC: Bloggers must disclose paid reviews
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33177160/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Penelope,</p>
<p>Did you see the FTC is requiring bloggers to be transparent in product mentions?  This made me think about your post (above) earlier this year.  I didn&#039;t even know that the FTC considered the blogosphere as part of its domain.  Thought you might be interested.   &#8211;Jeffrey</p>
<p>FTC: Bloggers must disclose paid reviews<br />
<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33177160/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33177160/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symposium (another Aussie)</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/05/28/conflict-of-interest-doesnt-apply-to-blogs-another-reason-newspapers-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-197086</link>
		<dc:creator>Symposium (another Aussie)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2679#comment-197086</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this comment. My thoughts exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this comment. My thoughts exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prachan</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/05/28/conflict-of-interest-doesnt-apply-to-blogs-another-reason-newspapers-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-190653</link>
		<dc:creator>prachan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 06:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2679#comment-190653</guid>
		<description>think more idea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>think more idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/05/28/conflict-of-interest-doesnt-apply-to-blogs-another-reason-newspapers-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-189551</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2679#comment-189551</guid>
		<description>Two more notes:  First - you demand transparency for salary information, yet your revenue streams are off limits?  Second - Seth Godin just had a post 

http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/07/ishitas-here.html

where he is absolutely transparent about his arrangements.  Good enough for Seth is good enough for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two more notes:  First &#8211; you demand transparency for salary information, yet your revenue streams are off limits?  Second &#8211; Seth Godin just had a post </p>
<p><a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/07/ishitas-here.html" rel="nofollow">http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/07/ishitas-here.html</a></p>
<p>where he is absolutely transparent about his arrangements.  Good enough for Seth is good enough for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/05/28/conflict-of-interest-doesnt-apply-to-blogs-another-reason-newspapers-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-188939</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2679#comment-188939</guid>
		<description>I got jacked on paypal by some jerkwad hiding behind a mobile account.  Asswipe was speechless when I got her contact info and made a house call lol!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://spaces.msn.com/members/reverse-phone-lookup/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Phone Search&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got jacked on paypal by some jerkwad hiding behind a mobile account.  Asswipe was speechless when I got her contact info and made a house call lol!</p>
<p><a href="http://spaces.msn.com/members/reverse-phone-lookup/" rel="nofollow">Phone Search</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KateNonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/05/28/conflict-of-interest-doesnt-apply-to-blogs-another-reason-newspapers-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-188170</link>
		<dc:creator>KateNonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2679#comment-188170</guid>
		<description>So I&#039;m not the only one who saw this news and thought of Penelope!

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/sns-ap-us-tec-bloggers-freebie-disclosures,0,4991648.story</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#039;m not the only one who saw this news and thought of Penelope!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/sns-ap-us-tec-bloggers-freebie-disclosures,0,4991648.story" rel="nofollow">http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/sns-ap-us-tec-bloggers-freebie-disclosures,0,4991648.story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: froggyprager</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/05/28/conflict-of-interest-doesnt-apply-to-blogs-another-reason-newspapers-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-188115</link>
		<dc:creator>froggyprager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2679#comment-188115</guid>
		<description>It seems that the FTC disagrees with your thoughts on this topic.  The FTC should go after the MSM and big websites and not bloggers.  I agree with some of your points but not all.  Voluntary disclosure would be a good approach in most cases.  Do you want to be an honest objective voice or corporate hack? http://frogsonthemoon.blogspot.com/2009/06/to-disclose-or-not-to-disclose.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the FTC disagrees with your thoughts on this topic.  The FTC should go after the MSM and big websites and not bloggers.  I agree with some of your points but not all.  Voluntary disclosure would be a good approach in most cases.  Do you want to be an honest objective voice or corporate hack? <a href="http://frogsonthemoon.blogspot.com/2009/06/to-disclose-or-not-to-disclose.html" rel="nofollow">http://frogsonthemoon.blogspot.com/2009/06/to-disclose-or-not-to-disclose.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
