<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to deal with reference checks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/04/28/how-to-deal-with-reference-checks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/04/28/how-to-deal-with-reference-checks/</link>
	<description>Advice at the intersection of work and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:17:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Assech Omega</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/04/28/how-to-deal-with-reference-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-248486</link>
		<dc:creator>Assech Omega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2475#comment-248486</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chineseenergetics.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Energy Psychology
&lt;/a&gt;

this is really cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.chineseenergetics.com" rel="nofollow"><br />
Energy Psychology<br />
</a></p>
<p>this is really cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Junes</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/04/28/how-to-deal-with-reference-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-227804</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Junes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 14:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2475#comment-227804</guid>
		<description>It all depends. Sometimes they ask reference checks and sometimes not, but if they were really big companies, I really think they will check your references. Reference checks are really important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all depends. Sometimes they ask reference checks and sometimes not, but if they were really big companies, I really think they will check your references. Reference checks are really important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/04/28/how-to-deal-with-reference-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-227469</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 18:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2475#comment-227469</guid>
		<description>With social media references are passe&#039; unless it is the federal, state or local government or those positions working with the public. so forgetaboutit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With social media references are passe&#039; unless it is the federal, state or local government or those positions working with the public. so forgetaboutit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Mitchell, CPRW</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/04/28/how-to-deal-with-reference-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-216123</link>
		<dc:creator>William Mitchell, CPRW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2475#comment-216123</guid>
		<description>Not sure how to dodge companies that perform references. They all ask for them, although not all follow through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how to dodge companies that perform references. They all ask for them, although not all follow through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tonkin</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/04/28/how-to-deal-with-reference-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-188287</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tonkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2475#comment-188287</guid>
		<description>You could have saved yourself time by just having the one line:
&quot;Don&#039;t work for a person who relies on reference checks. They’re lame.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could have saved yourself time by just having the one line:<br />
&#034;Don&#039;t work for a person who relies on reference checks. They’re lame.&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sr. HR Guy</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/04/28/how-to-deal-with-reference-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-188266</link>
		<dc:creator>Sr. HR Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2475#comment-188266</guid>
		<description>Love your blog Penelope and usually agree with them all but I&#039;m afraid that this time it&#039;s my opinion that you missed the target.  I&#039;ve been performing reference checks for years and the only reason that a person would use a true &#039;ringer&#039; is if they have something to hide and if they are using a ringer, they&#039;re a liar and lack the type of character of the people you should associate with, let alone hire.

Nonetheless, I never expect to receive negative feedback from reference actually listed on applications.  Who would list the name of someone who hated them or their work?  That&#039;s where the skill of performing reference checks come in; getting to the truth, whether it&#039;s good or bad.  I&#039;ve had applicants tell me that trying to get a job at our company is like trying to get a job at the CIA and frankly, that&#039;s the way it should be if you&#039;re gambling the success of your company (and your livelihood) on the people you hire... which is everyone; from warehouse worker to CFO.

Two applicants/reference checks stick out in my mind: something didn&#039;t ring true so I dug and dug and dug.  It turns out that one applicant had a criminal history of abusing women and the second had a nasty habit of exposing himself to girls, which they both finally confirmed.  Digging into their references and beyond paid off for us.  The laws of HR are changing and I always remind the references and previous employers that if they don&#039;t tell me about something violent or criminal, that they can be held liable for negligence via omission if we hire the person and they become a repeat offender. 

In regards to (social) networking, I love it!  Get out there and network because as an employer I make certain to check all of the social networking sites and if you think that information is private, then you&#039;re using the wrong search tools.  I love interviewing someone who tells me they have no problem with early AM shifts and then find out they usually spend their nights clubbing and they&#039;ve made a comment on their Facebook page which shows how they hate, hate, HATE to get up before 9AM.

Keep up the great work Penelope, I have to say that 99.9% of your blogs are laser-pointer perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your blog Penelope and usually agree with them all but I&#039;m afraid that this time it&#039;s my opinion that you missed the target.  I&#039;ve been performing reference checks for years and the only reason that a person would use a true &#039;ringer&#039; is if they have something to hide and if they are using a ringer, they&#039;re a liar and lack the type of character of the people you should associate with, let alone hire.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, I never expect to receive negative feedback from reference actually listed on applications.  Who would list the name of someone who hated them or their work?  That&#039;s where the skill of performing reference checks come in; getting to the truth, whether it&#039;s good or bad.  I&#039;ve had applicants tell me that trying to get a job at our company is like trying to get a job at the CIA and frankly, that&#039;s the way it should be if you&#039;re gambling the success of your company (and your livelihood) on the people you hire&#8230; which is everyone; from warehouse worker to CFO.</p>
<p>Two applicants/reference checks stick out in my mind: something didn&#039;t ring true so I dug and dug and dug.  It turns out that one applicant had a criminal history of abusing women and the second had a nasty habit of exposing himself to girls, which they both finally confirmed.  Digging into their references and beyond paid off for us.  The laws of HR are changing and I always remind the references and previous employers that if they don&#039;t tell me about something violent or criminal, that they can be held liable for negligence via omission if we hire the person and they become a repeat offender. </p>
<p>In regards to (social) networking, I love it!  Get out there and network because as an employer I make certain to check all of the social networking sites and if you think that information is private, then you&#039;re using the wrong search tools.  I love interviewing someone who tells me they have no problem with early AM shifts and then find out they usually spend their nights clubbing and they&#039;ve made a comment on their Facebook page which shows how they hate, hate, HATE to get up before 9AM.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work Penelope, I have to say that 99.9% of your blogs are laser-pointer perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nike Lebron VI</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/04/28/how-to-deal-with-reference-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-187124</link>
		<dc:creator>Nike Lebron VI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2475#comment-187124</guid>
		<description>hate giving references. I&#039;m 24 and don&#039;t exactly have an overwhelming number of great ones (or really any that could augment me in a professional manner).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hate giving references. I&#039;m 24 and don&#039;t exactly have an overwhelming number of great ones (or really any that could augment me in a professional manner).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thatgirlinnewyork</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/04/28/how-to-deal-with-reference-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-185336</link>
		<dc:creator>thatgirlinnewyork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2475#comment-185336</guid>
		<description>perhaps references are being falling victim to the (ugly, in my opinion) preference for background and credit checks now being widely used. as middle management in marketing, i have seen a huge increase in this, and it makes me uneasy. too many entities have access to our credit information, as it is. it is shoddy and paranoia-inducing--and who says it stands as a good litmus for employment?

would love everyone&#039;s thoughts on this practice.

i&#039;m with nadia--&quot;lame&quot; is an apt word, and more widely used to describe injured dogs. using it in this context doesn&#039;t diminish anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps references are being falling victim to the (ugly, in my opinion) preference for background and credit checks now being widely used. as middle management in marketing, i have seen a huge increase in this, and it makes me uneasy. too many entities have access to our credit information, as it is. it is shoddy and paranoia-inducing&#8211;and who says it stands as a good litmus for employment?</p>
<p>would love everyone&#039;s thoughts on this practice.</p>
<p>i&#039;m with nadia&#8211;&#034;lame&#034; is an apt word, and more widely used to describe injured dogs. using it in this context doesn&#039;t diminish anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ResumePro &#124; How to deal with reference checks</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/04/28/how-to-deal-with-reference-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-185332</link>
		<dc:creator>ResumePro &#124; How to deal with reference checks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2475#comment-185332</guid>
		<description>[...] Penelope Trunk&#8217;s Brazen Careerist by Penelope [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Penelope Trunk&#039;s Brazen Careerist by Penelope [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traveler</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2009/04/28/how-to-deal-with-reference-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-185308</link>
		<dc:creator>Traveler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 03:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/?p=2475#comment-185308</guid>
		<description>Whether you like it or not, reference checks DO HAPPEN, all major corporations do them, I know from my background in HR.  A better bet than pretending they don&#039;t matter is to make sure yours are good- have a reference checking service like allisontaylor.com or reference-check.com find out what people are really saying about you.  A bad reference CAN and DOES cost people jobs every day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether you like it or not, reference checks DO HAPPEN, all major corporations do them, I know from my background in HR.  A better bet than pretending they don&#039;t matter is to make sure yours are good- have a reference checking service like allisontaylor.com or reference-check.com find out what people are really saying about you.  A bad reference CAN and DOES cost people jobs every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: blog.penelopetrunk.com @ 2012-02-09 04:30:09 -->
