<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter, social media, and unmashing the mashable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/</link>
	<description>Advice at the intersection of work and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flo Schmo</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/comment-page-2/#comment-180867</link>
		<dc:creator>Flo Schmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/#comment-180867</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I agree with all the reasoning behind your assertion that it is not good to mashup various forms of social media. For someone like me, I like to keep my various web personas (and there are several) separate, but I also like to compound my contacts. For instance, as an author, many co-authors like to band together and follow each other on various social networking sites. Because some, like Twitter, can present a challenge to finding others, I&#039;ve had several people tell me that the only way to find me there was to visit my blog and go through my Twitter updates. So it&#039;s not all bad...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m not sure I agree with all the reasoning behind your assertion that it is not good to mashup various forms of social media. For someone like me, I like to keep my various web personas (and there are several) separate, but I also like to compound my contacts. For instance, as an author, many co-authors like to band together and follow each other on various social networking sites. Because some, like Twitter, can present a challenge to finding others, I&#039;ve had several people tell me that the only way to find me there was to visit my blog and go through my Twitter updates. So it&#039;s not all bad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Too Much Social Media &#124; Daniel Hoang Mashable</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/comment-page-2/#comment-172278</link>
		<dc:creator>Too Much Social Media &#124; Daniel Hoang Mashable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/#comment-172278</guid>
		<description>[...] Trunk, founder of the Brazen Careerist network, wrote a piece a while back about unmashing the social sites. As I&#039;ve opened and attempted to maintain these sites, I&#039;ve built a brand around myself. However, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trunk, founder of the Brazen Careerist network, wrote a piece a while back about unmashing the social sites. As I&#039;ve opened and attempted to maintain these sites, I&#039;ve built a brand around myself. However, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark W.</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/comment-page-2/#comment-169926</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/#comment-169926</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up on the New York Times article dated 9/7/08  titled &quot;Brave New World of Digital Intimacy&quot; from the news section of the Brazen Careerist web site. Initially the article was about the news feed on Facebook instituted in 2006 but as it turns out was as much about Twitter and other social media communication tools. I didn&#039;t realize they had a name for it - &quot;ambient awareness&quot;. It&#039;s a great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up on the New York Times article dated 9/7/08  titled &#034;Brave New World of Digital Intimacy&#034; from the news section of the Brazen Careerist web site. Initially the article was about the news feed on Facebook instituted in 2006 but as it turns out was as much about Twitter and other social media communication tools. I didn&#039;t realize they had a name for it &#8211; &#034;ambient awareness&#034;. It&#039;s a great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody McKibben</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/comment-page-2/#comment-169830</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody McKibben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/#comment-169830</guid>
		<description>Hey Penelope!

Well this post already has like 41,000 comments, but I just wanted to say you make a really great point. And when you talk about your friend at Google not wanting to dilute his professional searches with Myspace photos, it got me thinking. My cousin recently asked me to remove all my photos with him from my Flickr account - mostly from family occasions and memories of me and him having a great time in London/Amsterdam. I don&#039;t think I even have one picture of him holding a beer (!), but because an old coworker of his came across his photo online, he&#039;s worried about it. I despise the fact that in our culture, our professional &quot;brand&quot; in the workplace dictates how we live the rest of our lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Penelope!</p>
<p>Well this post already has like 41,000 comments, but I just wanted to say you make a really great point. And when you talk about your friend at Google not wanting to dilute his professional searches with Myspace photos, it got me thinking. My cousin recently asked me to remove all my photos with him from my Flickr account &#8211; mostly from family occasions and memories of me and him having a great time in London/Amsterdam. I don&#039;t think I even have one picture of him holding a beer (!), but because an old coworker of his came across his photo online, he&#039;s worried about it. I despise the fact that in our culture, our professional &#034;brand&#034; in the workplace dictates how we live the rest of our lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Identità e social media &#171; One Missing Letter</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/comment-page-2/#comment-160430</link>
		<dc:creator>Identità e social media &#171; One Missing Letter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/#comment-160430</guid>
		<description>[...] e social&#160;media  Interessante post di Penelope Trunk, giornalista del Boston Globe, sull&#8217;uso dei vari social media mashing our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] e social&nbsp;media  Interessante post di Penelope Trunk, giornalista del Boston Globe, sull&#039;uso dei vari social media mashing our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sheridan</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/comment-page-2/#comment-159958</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sheridan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/#comment-159958</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m late to the party, but that&#039;s normal.

An excellent post, Penelope, as usual.  Understanding that each community has a different experience is something that everyone needs to assess before they join.  One-size-fits-all messaging doesn&#039;t work in this game, and can hurt your personal (or corporate) brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m late to the party, but that&#039;s normal.</p>
<p>An excellent post, Penelope, as usual.  Understanding that each community has a different experience is something that everyone needs to assess before they join.  One-size-fits-all messaging doesn&#039;t work in this game, and can hurt your personal (or corporate) brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putting the Social Media Pieces Together &#124; ChrisKenton.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/comment-page-2/#comment-158939</link>
		<dc:creator>Putting the Social Media Pieces Together &#124; ChrisKenton.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/#comment-158939</guid>
		<description>[...] Trunk from the Boston Globe posted a very incisive piece on the proliferation and fragmentation of social media tools, and the implications for developing a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trunk from the Boston Globe posted a very incisive piece on the proliferation and fragmentation of social media tools, and the implications for developing a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurenn</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/comment-page-2/#comment-150672</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/#comment-150672</guid>
		<description>For progressive 30 something I am a social media moron (I&#039;ve been on LinkedIn for years, don&#039;t understand the lure of MySpace or Facebook and am just starting to explore blogging). In many ways I&#039;ve made a conscious decision not to engage because I feel like &quot;it&quot; is spiraling out of control. I do see the benefit of blogging and keeping in touch with friends but when is enough enough? How many places do we need to be and how much time [alone] are we spending there? We are people, do we need to brand and market ourselves online as if we are trying to market products to various target markets? Is there a false sense of security or comfort I&#039;ve yet to find by sharing my opinions with strangers (as I am now), collecting online friends and joining virtual communities? Are we a lonely generation with an identity crisis? 

I pose these questions not because I have answers to them or think they are true. This is simply a topic I struggle with and have only recently begun to explore. The way I see it, most of us are accessible 24/7 yet few of us are saving lives (and therefore don&#039;t need to be so accessible). There&#039;s little down/quiet time. We&#039;re all networked and branded online but face to face personal interactions are suffering. 

I&#039;m used to being the dissenting point of view and expect someone to defend his/her beloved social media. But before you respond walk down a lively city street and look at all the people walking together or having lunch yet ignoring the person in front of them in favor of a phone or PDA. Respect has all but gone out of the window, as has uninterrupted quality time with friends and family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For progressive 30 something I am a social media moron (I&#039;ve been on LinkedIn for years, don&#039;t understand the lure of MySpace or Facebook and am just starting to explore blogging). In many ways I&#039;ve made a conscious decision not to engage because I feel like &#034;it&#034; is spiraling out of control. I do see the benefit of blogging and keeping in touch with friends but when is enough enough? How many places do we need to be and how much time [alone] are we spending there? We are people, do we need to brand and market ourselves online as if we are trying to market products to various target markets? Is there a false sense of security or comfort I&#039;ve yet to find by sharing my opinions with strangers (as I am now), collecting online friends and joining virtual communities? Are we a lonely generation with an identity crisis? </p>
<p>I pose these questions not because I have answers to them or think they are true. This is simply a topic I struggle with and have only recently begun to explore. The way I see it, most of us are accessible 24/7 yet few of us are saving lives (and therefore don&#039;t need to be so accessible). There&#039;s little down/quiet time. We&#039;re all networked and branded online but face to face personal interactions are suffering. </p>
<p>I&#039;m used to being the dissenting point of view and expect someone to defend his/her beloved social media. But before you respond walk down a lively city street and look at all the people walking together or having lunch yet ignoring the person in front of them in favor of a phone or PDA. Respect has all but gone out of the window, as has uninterrupted quality time with friends and family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t compete with Facebook. Complement it. &#171; D.O. Editing</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/comment-page-2/#comment-148936</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t compete with Facebook. Complement it. &#171; D.O. Editing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/#comment-148936</guid>
		<description>[...] They’re complementary. Penelope Trunk had a great post about this last week, which you can read here. The take-home message is that different electronic tools have different purposes. Just like you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They’re complementary. Penelope Trunk had a great post about this last week, which you can read here. The take-home message is that different electronic tools have different purposes. Just like you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/comment-page-2/#comment-148892</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2008/06/04/twitter-social-media-and-unmashing-the-mashable/#comment-148892</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad someone is talking about this.  I&#039;m not sure how successful maintaining multi-faceted personalities online will be.  The analogy to &quot;real world&quot; relationships obviously is spot on, but the important difference is control over audience.  I more than agree that the plethora of social media in which to express ourselves not only works well with our complex personalities, but also is designed differently in which certain behaviors make more sense. However, recall the awkwardness of those &quot;real world&quot; slips, when your boss catches you saying a lewd comment to a coworker, or a social friend accidentally being the outlet for some personal issue that would&#039;ve been better suited for an intimate friend.

Typically we have control over our audience thanks to the whole spatio-temporal network of the &quot;real world&quot;. Sally is in another city or Jimmy walked in a couple seconds too late.  But when it comes to all our online media we lose much of that control over audience.  Not only is it nice to be able to interact with the same person in different ways, professionally and socially, its also nice to be able to keep people separate.  Which I suppose, over a slew of different privacy settings for each medium one might achieve a similar degree of control, but I think for the average user you are open and out there for any of your networked contacts.  And thus, I see a motive for trying to be consistent or flat in character.  How do we gauge the level of intimate progression with acquaintances to close friends to family in a potentially undifferentiated space such as the Google search results page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m glad someone is talking about this.  I&#039;m not sure how successful maintaining multi-faceted personalities online will be.  The analogy to &#034;real world&#034; relationships obviously is spot on, but the important difference is control over audience.  I more than agree that the plethora of social media in which to express ourselves not only works well with our complex personalities, but also is designed differently in which certain behaviors make more sense. However, recall the awkwardness of those &#034;real world&#034; slips, when your boss catches you saying a lewd comment to a coworker, or a social friend accidentally being the outlet for some personal issue that would&#039;ve been better suited for an intimate friend.</p>
<p>Typically we have control over our audience thanks to the whole spatio-temporal network of the &#034;real world&#034;. Sally is in another city or Jimmy walked in a couple seconds too late.  But when it comes to all our online media we lose much of that control over audience.  Not only is it nice to be able to interact with the same person in different ways, professionally and socially, its also nice to be able to keep people separate.  Which I suppose, over a slew of different privacy settings for each medium one might achieve a similar degree of control, but I think for the average user you are open and out there for any of your networked contacts.  And thus, I see a motive for trying to be consistent or flat in character.  How do we gauge the level of intimate progression with acquaintances to close friends to family in a potentially undifferentiated space such as the Google search results page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
