It is a cliche that everyone thinks they’re a strategist. The reason everyone thinks they’re a strategist is because they don’t know what a strategist does.
Get a reality check. Odds are you are not a strategist.
Strategy requires thinking conceptually and creating something from nothing. So, for the most part, if you need to see something in order to do strategy then you are not doing strategy, you’re doing editing.
Strategists usually favor thinking about the future instead of the present; strategists I admire are bored by what is and focus on what could be.
Also, strategy means constantly making decisions based on incomplete information. It means taking intellectual leaps of faith that could derail many departments in an organization, and doing that with confidence.
The best thing you can do for your career is take a personality test to understand your strengths. If you are an INTJ you really are a strategist. If you are not an INTJ, the fewer letters you have that match that, the further away from strategist you are. So get some self-knowledge before you declare yourself a strategist.
If you’re not a strategist, find work that plays to your strengths.
So look, most of you aren’t strategists. But so what? It doesn’t mean you’re not brilliant. There are many ways to be brilliant.
It is a misconception that the strategists do all the important work and everyone else does grunt work. There’s plenty of important, interesting work that is detail-oriented and highly creative, such as building a space ship or doing cinematography.
A lot of people think that if they are not creative or technical then they are strategists. This is not always true. A strategist thinks very big picture and also thinks ahead in time. People who are not artists or programmers and think in terms of the here and now are managers. If you do that with charisma, you’re a leader.
If you are a strategist, then quit talking about it and do it.
Most people I have managed have told me, at one point or another, that their strength is strategy. For the most part, I hear this as “I don’t know how to execute what you’re asking me to execute.” This is why the best way to understand how to do strategy is to execute on other peoples’ strategies. You see first-hand what the common pitfalls of strategy are.
Stop complaining that you are a frustrated strategist because today people at all levels in the organization are getting more opportunity to show their talent as strategists.
This trend is partly a result of management theorists focusing on improving work for the lower ranks–not because improving entry-level work is ethical, but because the topic of how to be a better leader is exhausted, and academics need something fresh to write about, according to the Wall Street Journal.
An example of this trend toward glorifying the low-ranking employee is the book Followership: How Followers are Creating Change and Changing Leaders, by Barbara Kellerman, professor at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. Research like Kellerman’s should drive home to you that if you’re a strategist, you can do it from anywhere in the org chart. So think of a great strategy in your entry-level job and then develop a strategy to convince people in the company to listen to you. That’s a test of your strategic strength right there.
And if you’re not doing strategy in your current job, you might consider that you are like the guy who thinks he is a novelist but is not writing a novel: People do what their strengths are regardless of what their job description is. Real leaders will lead in any situation they find themselves. Real writers will always write, no matter what their day job is. And real strategists will always think in terms of the conceptual future, from any job they have.
Subscribe — free! 

Don't do what you love
Don't go to grad school
Blueprint for a Woman's life
Living up to your potential is BS
Choose sex over money
5 Time management tricks I learned from years of hating Tim Ferriss (1013 comments)
I hate David Dellifield. The one from Ada, Ohio. (552 comments)
You can’t manage your work life if you can’t talk about it (764 comments)
The Farmer
Melissa
Penelope
I second the fact that NTJs generally tend to be more successful in the corporate world. However, I do not fully agree with your definition of ‘strategist’. It is said as if it were absolute. I think any NT rationals are fine strategists. Each of the four types are more powerful in a certain field compared to others. I can not see how INTJs are the absolute, ultimate strategists. From my experience, INTJs can be blind to spots that ENTPs can see very obviously. Part of being a great strategist certainly requires a good ‘P’.
Posted by Karine Kirkpatrick on March 25, 2009 at 11:27 pm | permalink |
Moronic blog #5
Posted by R. Alexander on September 1, 2009 at 10:16 pm | permalink |
I third the fact that NTJs generally tend to be more successful in the corporate world
Posted by Potty Training on February 23, 2010 at 9:45 pm | permalink |
woot! nice post thanks!
Posted by Potty Training Boys on February 23, 2010 at 9:45 pm | permalink |
I was thinking the same thing as most the people above. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
Posted by How To Potty Train A Toddler on February 23, 2010 at 9:47 pm | permalink |
I hope YOU’RE not a strategist; you’re making all of us look like assholes.
Whatever you are, quit being so fcuking haughty.
Posted by alex on March 11, 2010 at 1:57 am | permalink |
I know, that guy’s a ***hole.
Posted by A on January 11, 2011 at 6:30 pm | permalink |
I took the test.I’m a strategist.I’m a good one also.If anyone wants to stay in touch then my account is ben.gafford@yahoo.com
Posted by Ben .G on November 23, 2010 at 8:45 pm | permalink |
The information that I read didn’t help at all.All I wanted was a few tips on how to gain trust.
Posted by Ben .G on November 23, 2010 at 8:51 pm | permalink |
Someone sent me this article…there are a few key points that I agree with, but I’d offer that there some fundamental problems
Particularly when you claim you are an Extrovert (E), so maybe you’re “strategist who spends too much time telling to the world about it”. That statement alone shows a major misinterpretation of what an Extrovert in the context of an MBTI test is. Having learned and taught MBTI, I’d say the test clearly states that Extrovert vs. Introvert is not one’s social behavior, rather how one sources their energy and enthusiasm. A MBTI extrovert is somebody who sources their energy/enthusiasm by being around other people – a MBTI Introvert is one who best sources energy/enthusiasm on their own. MBTI extroverts aren’t necessarily the center of attention, or the loudest talkers, or even talkative at all. I know plenty of MBTI extroverts who like being in big groups but being a peripheral player. On the flipside, I have a friend who is a strong MBTI Introvert but is the most social guy I know…center of attention, friends all over the place, loves parties and people love him. But when he needs to decompress or reenergize or get ready for a big task, he likes to stay home, play his guitar or do something else creative/manual, and process that way. Your assertions about how to interpret MBTI seem flawed.
I agree that too many people claim to be strategists, many because they say “well, I think creatively and outside the box, so I must be a strategist.” No. However to me a strategist is someone who is definitely forward thinking, constantly thinking about what their world/industry looks like in the future, while also thinking about how they/their company can play in that future. The best strategists are also the people who can help the non-strategists understand what that future looks like, and help them plan how to get their (or at the very least surround themselves by people who can help plan the bridge from now to the future). A “strategist” who only thinks about what the world looks like years out (and all the varying scenarios/flavors it might take), but does nothing to help steward that vision to those who execute on the vision isn’t a strategist at all, they’re just a dreamer. Strategy is a combination of vision as well as planning to achieve that vision.
And “creating something from nothing” isn’t just for strategists. I know product innovators, supply chain managers, operations analysts, IT folks, etc. who would not claim to be strategists because they work with a short-term lens, but all can create wonderful "somethings from nothings" to get their jobs done with excellence.
Posted by Z on January 6, 2011 at 12:26 am | permalink |
What do you know? You’re probably just some cranky guy who’s never won a simple game of risk, or any other type of strategy game. No, I’m not mad cuz I got the wrong one, but honestly, who cares what you think?
Posted by A on January 11, 2011 at 6:28 pm | permalink |
INTJs are the best. I’m an INTJ and I teach middle school. Talk about personality type mismatched to career. Maybe I should start looking for a job as a “strategist.”
Posted by Ash on January 12, 2011 at 4:41 pm | permalink |
Thanks Penelope.
Posted by Potty Training on February 18, 2011 at 10:37 pm | permalink |
so true. i was going to give a similar comment until i saw this one. well said.
Posted by PaulVF on June 25, 2011 at 9:42 am | permalink |
How could a strategist be “someone who creates something from nothing”? This would correspond to someone being labeled “problem solver” who doesn’t know about a particular problem, but sets about to solve it. There must be some amount of information available, plus a realization that a problem or a need for a strategy exists, and these are not nothing.
Posted by GeoregH on May 28, 2011 at 11:03 am | permalink |
I think that most peoply mean battle strategy when they call themselves (or other people) strategists. Also, most taoists share the qualities you have mentioned. Does that mean taoism is simply strategic thinking? Additionally, in order to see what could be (or could have been) you need to have a creative and imaginative mind, much like a “novelist” as you coarsly put it (thare are many kinds of novelists, andnovel thinkers for that matter). however, an interesting article and an interesting point of view!
Posted by Garion555 on May 29, 2011 at 8:38 am | permalink |
p.s: by battle strategy I meant that people play stategy games such as “Rome: Total War” and are good at it so think thay are a strategist. Sorry for any confusion!!
Posted by Garion555 on May 29, 2011 at 8:42 am | permalink |
Someone above mentioned that those with Ps would make better strategists because the perceiving function makes them more willing to explore further options. I have frequently noticed that people tend to place INTJs in the same box as ISTJs albeit with slightly more flexibility and they often classify INTPs/ENTPs into the “thinking outside the box” category just to “prove” that they are more intelligent/superior to other MBTI types. Is an unhealthy INTP a much better strategist than a healthy INTJ because of the perceiving function preference? Honestly, this is pure crap and egoism. The MBTI test only analyses how people prefer one function over the other. It does NOT mean that the less preferred functions are impaired. Everyone uses all the eight functions in their daily lives; it’s just a matter of frequency and how familiar they are with the lesser used functions. Every type has its strengths and weaknesses. People who stereotype and discriminate other types based on the S or J preferences are absolutely absurd. Being an ENTP does not make you a more brilliant person and being an ISTJ does not mean you are a hard-wired brain moron. The four letters do not define who you are. If you allow yourself to be constricted to the type your MBTI test states, then you are obviously not a strategist regardless of whether you are an ENTP or not.
Posted by Mayura on June 20, 2011 at 10:48 pm | permalink |
this article would make sense, if ideas were actually original. no artist, strategist, or conceptualist bases their production from a void.
Posted by gauta on August 3, 2011 at 3:16 am | permalink |
Hi I discovered that I am a INTJ, so I’m a strategist and what, what does that mean, how it will affect my life.
I’m 16 years old.
Thank
Posted by Samy on August 13, 2011 at 4:17 pm | permalink |
Hm. I’m an INFP. I think the tone of this article is pretty dreadful…And I would cut out every line in it except the last four lines.
Posted by Constance on September 6, 2011 at 3:13 am | permalink |
I’m not a strategist because I am not someone who is employed to do strategy. But thinking strategically is my strongest talent as identified by my strengthsfinder profile and confirmed by my excelling in political strategy classes as well as my love for all things strategy. Thinking strategically literally energizes me. That being said everything about this article rubs me the wrong way. From the title to the article itself this article seems to be written to alienate strategic thinkers and non strategic thinkers alike. Excessive negativity will never pass as motivation.
Posted by Adam Owada on September 8, 2011 at 6:41 am | permalink |
I am an INTJ, though weak on the J preference. I have found the 16-types more helpful in understanding other people than understanding myself. The test that really helped me understand me was the brain dominance test. I am balanced between the left and right side of my brain so I have had trouble finding a job that is both creative and analytical. But merely discovering that fact about me has been life changing. I used to think there was something wrong with me that it has taken me so long to find the right career goal.
Posted by Lisa on January 10, 2012 at 11:01 am | permalink |
fuck u bitch iam a strategist
Posted by strategist on February 14, 2012 at 5:27 pm | permalink |
Say “thanks” you for your mothers and fathers they gave you the world
Posted by Thank you on March 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm | permalink |
For me the article was thought provoking. More intriguing to me is the responses over the years.
I am with no doubt a strategiest. Good, bad and indifferent, it is something I cannot change. Personally, I didn’t understand it, never exploited it, just lived it. It wasn’t until I matured through a number of pioneering endeavors and life in general that I realized that without the void, I am nothing. I admire very much the person who is comfortable with their job, their life, their relationships, I have accepted I am who I am and I do what I do. I often enable that comfort when a company is faced with decline, so deep in the forest they don’t see the trees, or an engineer has a great invention but no clue how to take it to market. I am able to consume and process vast amounts of information, formulate concepts and to shed light on the potential and create the business plan, road map, and ‘what ifs’ to keep it dynamic and on track.
Posted by Speak4today on May 4, 2012 at 10:21 pm | permalink |
I’m a INTJ and my top 2 StrengthFinder skills are:
1.) Strategic
2.) Analytical
This article has been very helpful in realizing that Strategic Planning is my strong point and has made me want to reach a little higher than I have in the past!
So Thanks!
Posted by Don on October 3, 2012 at 9:54 pm | permalink |
I think Spartacus could’ve used a lesson or two on strategy. He was a great tactician but a lousy strategist. “On to Rome!” “Neh! let’s take a boat trip” xD lol.
Posted by Dr NoNo on February 3, 2013 at 6:50 am | permalink |
I’m an INTJ and have been since high school (with the occasional change to INFJ, INTP). Some things that irk me when I am at my work setting:
- People seem to associate having an extravert function as having leadership so I get called in to conduct meetings, workshops and so on. I find that this clashes with my innate need to make the most use of time as well as no BS approach to office politics where a certain individuals have to be invited and therefore ballooning said meeting to 10+ people. However when I do conduct a meeting or a workshop which I feel is needed then I do an excellent job at it.
- I get this feeling that people don’t trust my expertise because of my T and J functions where I require time to process and evaluate the answers. The reason why I don’t give out an answer on the spot is because I need to comprehend it, test it out (2, 3 times…), do various case scenarios to test out any weaknesses and gaps with my theories and then communicate it. Another reason why I feel like this is out of personal development and also the fact that I need to trust my judgement and intuition more and be more confident.
- Being a natural strategist as well in my personal life means that I am constantly pitting life-changing decisions based on constantly changing data pulled out from my personal life, from work, from finances and so on. Which means that I seem to be in a constant state of both being absolutely assured and paranoid with what the future will bring.
I suppose this relates to self-development but it really really irritates me when I have my line manager saying something
Posted by INTJ on February 3, 2013 at 1:20 pm | permalink |