My son’s I.Q. is in the top .05% of all preschoolers, but he attended preschool in a special education classroom. He has Asperger’s Syndrome, a form of autism typified by a distinctly high I.Q. and a notable lack of emotional intelligence. Asperger’s is thought to be genetic, and it is surging among kids in places like Silicon Valley, that attract math and tech geniuses who often have sub-par social skills.
We know one boy with Asperger’s who taught himself to read books when he was two years old. Scientists surmise that learning to read books so fast consumes the part of his brain that should be learning to read social cues.
My son’s special education classroom was full of kids like that one — who used to pass through the education system labeled eccentric geniuses, only to graduate having never learned social skills and consequently falter in adulthood.
Today, educators take a child’s lack of social skills seriously. Parents should also. For educators, any nonverbal learning disability (like not being able to tell if someone cares about what you are talking about) is treated as significantly as a verbal learning disability (like not being able to speak.) Yet I am stunned by how many parents brush aside recommendations from educators to get help for their children by saying to themselves, “My child is so smart.”
Smart is not an endgame. Even in a toddler.
To understand why, look to the workplace. After where you go to school, social skills are the most important factor in whether you succeed or fail. I link to this research all the time, but frankly, if you need research to understand that the people who are best at office politics succeed at the office, then you are missing basic social cues already.
But here’s more evidence: Nine out of ten business schools consider communication and interpersonal skills “highly underrated as a differentiating factor for students,” according to CareerJournal. And Jeff Puzas at PRTM echos a cacophony of workplace voices when he says, “Most of what I do every day as a management consultant has to do with interpersonal skills, not my I.Q.”
And when you think about someone finding his way to success in the real world, consider the Wall St. Journal’s list of the traits that recruiters look for in business school candidates:
Communication and interpersonal skills
Original and visionary thinking
Leadership potential
Ability to work well within a team
Analytical and problem-solving skills
Notice that most of these skills are independent of intelligence. Smart is even less of an endgame for adults than children-and the standard for ability to work well with others is only getting higher, not lower: Generation Y is more team-oriented than prior generations.
So, it’s time for us to stop making excuses for poor social skills and start taking the problem as seriously as educators do. It’s painful for both children and adults who cannot navigate social settings. Kids sit on the sidelines on the playground; adults can’t maintain close relationships. It’s a limited life and it’s limited in the area where people have an inherent need to thrive.
I sense that people are going to argue with me here, but please consider that all the positive psychology research points to the fact that work does not make people happy. Relationships do. But we see the history of people with Asperger’s – Einstein, Mozart, John Forbes Nash – they did amazing work but could not maintain stable, intimate relationships.
Parents: Stop pretending that your child’s I.Q. matters more than their social skills. Get treatment for your child as soon as a professional recommends it. Respect that the risk of not being able to transition to the work world is significant, and so is the risk of waiting to see if your child will fail despite being brilliant.
Human beings learn social skills best at a very young age, when their brain is still forming. So celebrate that the government provides free training for children lacking social skills by using it. Start studying the playground. Respect what often seems insignificant to parents with small children-diagnoses of speech delay or disorder, and diagnoses of sensory integration, for example. Those issues threaten future development of social skills.
As an adult, one of the hardest parts of having low emotional intelligence is that you don’t realize it. People who are missing the cues have no idea they are missing them. So the most unable often have the least understanding of where they fall in the spectrum.
I’m going to tell you something harsh: If your career is stuck, it’s probably because of poor social skills. People who don’t know what they want to do with themselves but have good social skills don’t feel stuck, they feel unsure. People who are lacking social skills feel like they have nowhere to go.
Lost people feel possibilities. Stuck people do not feel possibilities. Ask yourself which you are. And if you feel suck, stop looking outside yourself to solve the problem. You need to change how you interact with people.
Another idea for how to figure out where you fall in the social skills spectrum is to take a self-diagnostic test. Here is one at Wired magazine about Aperger’s, and here is one about emotional intelligence. Or give a test to the people you work with – a 360-degree review will tell you in no uncertain terms if you are being held back because people don’t like you.
Hold it. Did you just say, “If people don’t like me maybe it’s their fault!” Forget it. People with good social skills can get along with just about everyone.
So help your kids to form intimate relationships with peers, and help yourself, too. In fact, as an adult you can learn how to compensate for lack of social skills by watching how schools are teaching the kids to do it.
Pay attention. Because when it comes to our job – no matter what our job is – it’s the relationships that make us happy, not the work. That’s why I.Q. doesn’t matter.
Subscribe — free! 

Don't do what you love
Don't go to grad school
Blueprint for a Woman's life
Living up to your potential is BS
Choose sex over money
5 Time management tricks I learned from years of hating Tim Ferriss (1013 comments)
I hate David Dellifield. The one from Ada, Ohio. (552 comments)
You can’t manage your work life if you can’t talk about it (764 comments)
The Farmer
Melissa
Penelope
i think that you’re misinforming people by talking about people with asperger’s as all having a high IQ. A LOT of people with aspergers do not have high IQs.
Posted by anonymous on October 18, 2010 at 8:02 pm | permalink |
I dont think lack of social skills is as serious as it is made out to be in this article. Some people just dont need to feel psychologically ‘validated’ by others in a social ecosystem. I would like to point out this story: “Some people simply have a low need for affiliation,” from this page
http://www.psychologytoday.com/print/23750
That doesnt mean they are to be seen as ‘defective’ as someone that needs correction or help.
Posted by Mohan Arun L. on October 24, 2010 at 9:54 pm | permalink |
Hello,
Last two anonymous posts: I think Penelope Trunk understands that not all or even most Aspies have high IQs, just like not all or even most high school girls have beautiful bodies.
She’s warning that those Aspies who do have high IQs should not try to substitute them for social skills, just as those high school girls who have beautiful bodies might find it a good idea to acquire some useful skills too.
Mohan Arun L.: There are people who simply have a low need for affiliation. There are also people whose personalities would strip paint from woodwork at ten feet.* And speaking as an Aspie who used to display just that kind of behavior, we account for a disproportionate number of them.
Keep in mind that even NTs, let alone Aspies, have a hard time realistically estimating our social skills. For example, the College Board (which does the SATs [standardized college entrance exams], among other tests) found that 85% of high school upperclassmembers felt they have better social skills than a majority of their peers. In fact, 25% of high school upperclassmembers put themselves in the top 1%!
Now imagine a smart Aspie, who thinks that because he’s smart he should have no problems.** He needs to understand that technical smarts are the proverbial dime a dozen, whereas the ability to make others feel good – obviously as perceived by them – is what counts for who gets promoted, who stays and who gets canned (and maybe with a bad reference for good measure).
One person’s low need for affiliation is another person’s disrespect. If the latter is a customer or boss of the former, there will be problems…but not for long. The former will shape up or ship out.
[*] H/T: The great office politics analyst Marilyn Moats Kennedy.
[**] All too often, his peers and superiors make the same assumption – so they jump to the conclusion that his problematic words and actions are intentional precisely because he’s “smart enough to know better”.
What do you think?
Jeff Deutsch
Posted by Jeffrey Deutsch on October 26, 2010 at 10:47 am | permalink |
I think the issue with AS in silicon valley seems to be assortive mating, combining what would otherwise relatively benign genes into a child who will end up with AS.
This is another note for the positive eugenics file.
I guess that breeding for I.Q. does have it’s drawbacks (one of which I was certainly unaware when looking to get married). You could end up having a kid with AS. It’s certainly something to think about, isn’t it?
And Gen Y (the Millenials) are more team-oriented because they are of the Materialist-Collectivist. This will shift (again) as the Homelander generation comes of age. You won’t see people like the Boomers and the Xers again anytime soon.
Posted by JP on May 15, 2011 at 3:53 pm | permalink |
Some of this article is correct, but much of it is totally wrong. One of the most egregious statements is, “People with good social skills can get along with just about everyone.”
This is complete horse shit. This statement assumes that the only factor in social interactions is the skill of ONE of the parties. Getting along involves two or more people, and intent is as big a factor as social skill is. For example, you are unlikely to get along well with someone who hates you, no matter how good your social skills are.
Claiming that social skills are a guarantee of getting along with everyone ignores the fact that not everyone wants to get along with you.
The fact that this elementary observation completely escapes the author, in turn, casts doubt upon may of the other dubious statements in the article, which I find highly slanted and terribly simplistic.
Posted by Michael on November 26, 2011 at 6:34 am | permalink |
Wow, awesome blog structure! How long have you ever been running a blog for? you made blogging look easy. The overall glance of your site is fantastic, let alone the content material!
Posted by peace, love, emphaty on December 27, 2011 at 9:56 am | permalink |
Will listening to music make you smarter? Will learning to play a musical instrument make your brain grow larger than normal? Questions like these ones have been…
Posted by Nabila Chip on January 25, 2012 at 2:00 am | permalink |
I think the age old stigma of people with Aspergers being stupid has been going on too long. People need to learn to see people as they are
Posted by mark on February 9, 2012 at 3:12 pm | permalink |
I know quite a few people who are extremely intelligent, but have very, very poor social skills. I am always acting as a buffer between them and others.
Posted by Nena on May 29, 2012 at 3:21 pm | permalink |
Thanks for your post. My husband is a high-functioning aspie engineer and very happy with what he does for a living…he found his niche. (I don’t have Asperger’s, though as an academic, I’m around a lot of people who do). I have noticed that there is a noticeable difference in his social skills before and after he met me. Being in a long-term relationship has helped him pick up on social cues, and he has been promoted at work because of it. I would not change him in the least purposely, but I suppose I have had an unintentional influence upon him.
That said, he’s a genius at what he does, and I’m a big beneficiary from sharing his rather unique and interesting world view.
Things I have learned from my aspie husband include:
1. Everything can be related to physics if you try.
2. It is possible to figure out how machines work by listening to them.
3. Being sensitive to small sounds is a wonderful asset if you are a wildlife photographer (one of his hobbies).
4. With gaffa tape and string, you can engineer your way out of anything.
5. Loyalty
6. Honesty
7. Pragmatism
8. Love
Whilst of course social skills are important, I also think sometimes the American emphasis on extroversion is not always positive. When someone disabled is helped by one of my husband’s designs, I don’t think they worry too much if it is an effort for him to engage in small talk.
Anyhow, thanks again for your blog post.
Posted by Anna Marie on October 15, 2012 at 9:05 am | permalink |