<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Underreported hazards in early-stage startups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/</link>
	<description>Advice at the intersection of work and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:31:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sadya</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-221186</link>
		<dc:creator>sadya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/#comment-221186</guid>
		<description>amazingly funny post. loved it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amazingly funny post. loved it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-214669</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/#comment-214669</guid>
		<description>I really despise comments like this for the following reasons:

1. At least post it in the relevant section, on a relevant post on a current date. 

2. The comment is completely hysterical in that disturbing Freudian sort of way when psychiatrists talk of hysterical women.

3. The snobery of thinking that some mediums are appropriate to express this kind of throught and some for that kind of throught.
Whatever your opinion is you cannot control (nor should you have the right to) who uses what medium to say whatever they have to say.

4. Last but not least: The overwhelming intolerance of the comment. i.e Everyone must feel the same way I feel. Good people do what I do, bad people disagree. 

This kind of comment implies that if you have any feelings that are non-prescribed about periods, babies, abortions or miscarriages whatever, then they must never be expressed in case they shake the commentors own fragile pre-concieved ideas. 

Its ridiculous.

ps- Penelope, I&#039;ve gotten trapped in this blog. I ought to be working but I&#039;ve been surfing through the many related posts and internal links for about 2 days and now I&#039;m in a nightmare maze of multiple tabs. I&#039;m having a nice time though. This is a good blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really despise comments like this for the following reasons:</p>
<p>1. At least post it in the relevant section, on a relevant post on a current date. </p>
<p>2. The comment is completely hysterical in that disturbing Freudian sort of way when psychiatrists talk of hysterical women.</p>
<p>3. The snobery of thinking that some mediums are appropriate to express this kind of throught and some for that kind of throught.<br />
Whatever your opinion is you cannot control (nor should you have the right to) who uses what medium to say whatever they have to say.</p>
<p>4. Last but not least: The overwhelming intolerance of the comment. i.e Everyone must feel the same way I feel. Good people do what I do, bad people disagree. </p>
<p>This kind of comment implies that if you have any feelings that are non-prescribed about periods, babies, abortions or miscarriages whatever, then they must never be expressed in case they shake the commentors own fragile pre-concieved ideas. </p>
<p>Its ridiculous.</p>
<p>ps- Penelope, I&#039;ve gotten trapped in this blog. I ought to be working but I&#039;ve been surfing through the many related posts and internal links for about 2 days and now I&#039;m in a nightmare maze of multiple tabs. I&#039;m having a nice time though. This is a good blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica S</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-205174</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 06:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/#comment-205174</guid>
		<description>Are you for real? Posting about your supposed miscarriage? You seem to want to bring people to your blog pretty desperately. 
7:34 am in a board meeting having a miscarriage? Hmm you would not have made it to any meeting let alone walk around having a miscarriage &amp; if you were which I call bull*hit then you have very little respect for yourself &amp; your children. Miscarriage is painful both emotionally &amp; physically &amp; to broadcast it as if you were taking your mornung dump is 
not a professional nor respectful thing to do. 
Taking something serious &amp; making a joke if it is pretty
immature &amp; any advice you have to offer is F**ked up &amp; 
you simply are a desperate attention seeking selfish person. 
You owe an apology to women who have experienced loss &amp; losing a baby to a miscarriage is not a relief &amp; abortion is not birth control!
Get a grip &amp; think how lame your twitter is. 
You are like a child - negative attention is better than no attention.
Why not do something good &amp; focus on gaining respect &amp; attracting
people who will respect you &amp; your &quot;business&quot;
Grow up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you for real? Posting about your supposed miscarriage? You seem to want to bring people to your blog pretty desperately.<br />
7:34 am in a board meeting having a miscarriage? Hmm you would not have made it to any meeting let alone walk around having a miscarriage &amp; if you were which I call bull*hit then you have very little respect for yourself &amp; your children. Miscarriage is painful both emotionally &amp; physically &amp; to broadcast it as if you were taking your mornung dump is<br />
not a professional nor respectful thing to do.<br />
Taking something serious &amp; making a joke if it is pretty<br />
immature &amp; any advice you have to offer is F**ked up &amp;<br />
you simply are a desperate attention seeking selfish person.<br />
You owe an apology to women who have experienced loss &amp; losing a baby to a miscarriage is not a relief &amp; abortion is not birth control!<br />
Get a grip &amp; think how lame your twitter is.<br />
You are like a child &#8211; negative attention is better than no attention.<br />
Why not do something good &amp; focus on gaining respect &amp; attracting<br />
people who will respect you &amp; your &#034;business&#034;<br />
Grow up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark W.</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-202329</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/#comment-202329</guid>
		<description>I remember this very funny post (e.g. - ... better than Batman spaghetti O&#039;s.) I&#039;ll update this post for posterity with today&#039;s tweet.

Me: &quot;Ryan Healy has hydrocortisone on his desk.&quot; Ryan Paugh: &quot;You should write about his rash like you did mine.&quot; http://tinyurl.com/ypk5sq</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember this very funny post (e.g. &#8211; &#8230; better than Batman spaghetti O&#039;s.) I&#039;ll update this post for posterity with today&#039;s tweet.</p>
<p>Me: &#034;Ryan Healy has hydrocortisone on his desk.&#034; Ryan Paugh: &#034;You should write about his rash like you did mine.&#034; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ypk5sq" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ypk5sq</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Employee Evolution - Working with Penelope Trunk, Part Duex &#8212; A Startup Reality Show in the Making</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-127463</link>
		<dc:creator>Employee Evolution - Working with Penelope Trunk, Part Duex &#8212; A Startup Reality Show in the Making</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/#comment-127463</guid>
		<description>[...] just sat and laughed. She has already blogged about a rash I had, so shame just doesn&#8217;t seem to make sense for me [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just sat and laughed. She has already blogged about a rash I had, so shame just doesn&#039;t seem to make sense for me [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie R Lentzner</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-121778</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie R Lentzner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/#comment-121778</guid>
		<description>Oh my god - too funny.  When I started my company it was only my husband and me, which was okay but not great.  Then he continued with his full-time job and I hired women, one after another - at one point there were 8 of including me - not good with that many women - oh ya in my studio/used to be a garage.  Now I am going to have to go back and read every single post - great blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my god &#8211; too funny.  When I started my company it was only my husband and me, which was okay but not great.  Then he continued with his full-time job and I hired women, one after another &#8211; at one point there were 8 of including me &#8211; not good with that many women &#8211; oh ya in my studio/used to be a garage.  Now I am going to have to go back and read every single post &#8211; great blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Web World &#187; Working with Penelope Trunk — Tales from a Startup Soap Opera</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-112692</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Web World &#187; Working with Penelope Trunk — Tales from a Startup Soap Opera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/#comment-112692</guid>
		<description>[...] whether or not I should answer that question in a blog post. But what the hell! I gave her some huge leeway with her post about Ryan Healy and me. So here&#8217;s the other side of the reality-show startup saga [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whether or not I should answer that question in a blog post. But what the hell! I gave her some huge leeway with her post about Ryan Healy and me. So here&#039;s the other side of the reality-show startup saga [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Employee Evolution - Working with Penelope Trunk &#8212; Tales from a Startup Soap Opera</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-111696</link>
		<dc:creator>Employee Evolution - Working with Penelope Trunk &#8212; Tales from a Startup Soap Opera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/#comment-111696</guid>
		<description>[...] whether or not I should answer that question in a blog post. But what the hell! I gave her some huge leeway with her post about Ryan Healy and me. So here&#8217;s the other side of the reality-show startup saga [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whether or not I should answer that question in a blog post. But what the hell! I gave her some huge leeway with her post about Ryan Healy and me. So here&#039;s the other side of the reality-show startup saga [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-110563</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/#comment-110563</guid>
		<description>Penelope,
It must be really gratifying to see that the only time you get a significant amount of blog response anymore is when you play the flirty, sexual-on-the-edge card.  Keep it up - just a matter of time of time before even that loses its edge.  Your are in your 40s, aren&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Penelope,<br />
It must be really gratifying to see that the only time you get a significant amount of blog response anymore is when you play the flirty, sexual-on-the-edge card.  Keep it up &#8211; just a matter of time of time before even that loses its edge.  Your are in your 40s, aren&#039;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sifi M</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-110542</link>
		<dc:creator>Sifi M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2007/10/30/underrreported-hazards-in-early-stage-startups/#comment-110542</guid>
		<description>Wow. This is as good as reality TV. I think I will stick to the khakis. Not only are black shoes OK, they are better than brown! You wear the khakis with the black shoes and a black belt and a nice white shirt. Wear your BEST black loafers and they will &quot;pop&quot; as they say on the design shows. This is a timeless look in LA but may not go over in Madison, except on a muggy yet bright summer day. Try it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. This is as good as reality TV. I think I will stick to the khakis. Not only are black shoes OK, they are better than brown! You wear the khakis with the black shoes and a black belt and a nice white shirt. Wear your BEST black loafers and they will &#034;pop&#034; as they say on the design shows. This is a timeless look in LA but may not go over in Madison, except on a muggy yet bright summer day. Try it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
