<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking of video blogging? You should probably forget it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/</link>
	<description>Advice at the intersection of work and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:05:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Videoblogging Careers &#124; Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/comment-page-1/#comment-138506</link>
		<dc:creator>Videoblogging Careers &#124; Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/#comment-138506</guid>
		<description>[...] Response to Penelope Trunk&#8217;s article on videoblogging as a career. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Response to Penelope Trunk&#039;s article on videoblogging as a career. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/comment-page-1/#comment-138403</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/#comment-138403</guid>
		<description>eBook entitled The Book Trailer Revolution:Marketing and Promotion Through Digital Video was released last week. Though specific to book promotion, the valuable experience and information shared regarding digital video production and distribution could easily be applied to a variety of other industries. http://www.cosproductions.com/Resources/Index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eBook entitled The Book Trailer Revolution:Marketing and Promotion Through Digital Video was released last week. Though specific to book promotion, the valuable experience and information shared regarding digital video production and distribution could easily be applied to a variety of other industries. <a href="http://www.cosproductions.com/Resources/Index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cosproductions.com/Resources/Index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Vodcasting in a nutshell Jane&#8217;s Convergent Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/comment-page-1/#comment-107224</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Vodcasting in a nutshell Jane&#8217;s Convergent Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 04:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/#comment-107224</guid>
		<description>[...] Thinking of video blogging? You should probably forget it Penelope Trunk&#8217;s Brazen Careerist blog 21/11/06 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thinking of video blogging? You should probably forget it Penelope Trunk&#039;s Brazen Careerist blog 21/11/06 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New video blogger for Brazen Careerist: Bruce Tulgan &#187; Brazen Careerist</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/comment-page-1/#comment-25315</link>
		<dc:creator>New video blogger for Brazen Careerist: Bruce Tulgan &#187; Brazen Careerist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/#comment-25315</guid>
		<description>[...] I know, I know, I spent a whole post ranting about how almost everyone should not be video blogging. So it&#8217;s surprising to hear that I&#8217;m launching Bruce&#8217;s video blog here, right? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I know, I know, I spent a whole post ranting about how almost everyone should not be video blogging. So it&#039;s surprising to hear that I&#039;m launching Bruce&#039;s video blog here, right? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hobart</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5609</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hobart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 12:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/#comment-5609</guid>
		<description>Oh my, a video blog?  I think I&#039;d rather be chained to the dungeon wall...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my, a video blog?  I think I&#039;d rather be chained to the dungeon wall&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill C.</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4940</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 08:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/#comment-4940</guid>
		<description>Drew&#039;s post reminds me that the time spent on video blogging can be way more or way less than the time it takes to do a text blog, depending on how technical you want the presentation to be.  If you&#039;re doing comedy, you might have to keep editing until you get your timing right.  If your on-air-talent doesn&#039;t deliver properly, you might have to shoot a lot of takes.  If you&#039;re shooting on DV, you have to transfer the footage to your computer to edit it.  If you&#039;re greenscreening or compositing anything or placing a bug in the corner of your video or applying a filter to ensure that your video is within broadcast-safe levels, that&#039;s going to add to your rendering time.  OTOH, if you shoot your video blog with your mp4 camera, or better still, right through your webcam to your hard drive, saying it all in one take with no need for editing, creating that video might take substantially less time than typing out the same information.

I think having a formula is really important as well.  The popular video blogs that I&#039;m aware of do variations on a theme.  They&#039;re not random.  There&#039;s something you can expect to see or learn every time you tune in.  It&#039;s not the same show, but you expect to see certain actors or characters.  You expect the show to focus on something specific (tech, for instance).  You expect comedy or maybe news.  You expect jetsetshow.com to focus on teens.  You expect galacticast.com to focus on science fiction parody.  Unless really interesting things happen to you randomly, you&#039;re better off with a formula that you&#039;re comfortable with producing, and like Drew mentioned... that you ENJOY producing, than going with the flow and expecting people to &quot;tune in next time&quot; to check out your latest random antics. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew&#039;s post reminds me that the time spent on video blogging can be way more or way less than the time it takes to do a text blog, depending on how technical you want the presentation to be.  If you&#039;re doing comedy, you might have to keep editing until you get your timing right.  If your on-air-talent doesn&#039;t deliver properly, you might have to shoot a lot of takes.  If you&#039;re shooting on DV, you have to transfer the footage to your computer to edit it.  If you&#039;re greenscreening or compositing anything or placing a bug in the corner of your video or applying a filter to ensure that your video is within broadcast-safe levels, that&#039;s going to add to your rendering time.  OTOH, if you shoot your video blog with your mp4 camera, or better still, right through your webcam to your hard drive, saying it all in one take with no need for editing, creating that video might take substantially less time than typing out the same information.</p>
<p>I think having a formula is really important as well.  The popular video blogs that I&#039;m aware of do variations on a theme.  They&#039;re not random.  There&#039;s something you can expect to see or learn every time you tune in.  It&#039;s not the same show, but you expect to see certain actors or characters.  You expect the show to focus on something specific (tech, for instance).  You expect comedy or maybe news.  You expect jetsetshow.com to focus on teens.  You expect galacticast.com to focus on science fiction parody.  Unless really interesting things happen to you randomly, you&#039;re better off with a formula that you&#039;re comfortable with producing, and like Drew mentioned&#8230; that you ENJOY producing, than going with the flow and expecting people to &#034;tune in next time&#034; to check out your latest random antics. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew olanoff</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3673</link>
		<dc:creator>drew olanoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/#comment-3673</guid>
		<description>I spend anywhere from 20-25 hours writing, editing and deploying an episode of scriggity every week.  I get an hour and half worth of footage and in 7 hours shrink it down to 7 minutes or less.  Love every second of it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spend anywhere from 20-25 hours writing, editing and deploying an episode of scriggity every week.  I get an hour and half worth of footage and in 7 hours shrink it down to 7 minutes or less.  Love every second of it :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcinput &#187; Blog Archive &#187; dcinput daily for Fri 24th Nov, 2006</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3374</link>
		<dc:creator>dcinput &#187; Blog Archive &#187; dcinput daily for Fri 24th Nov, 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/#comment-3374</guid>
		<description>[...] A few days ago Penelope Trunk&#8217;s post Thinking about videoblogging? You should probably forget about it caused all sorts of discussion on the videoblogging mailing list. Anne from Loaded Pun explains why people on the videoblogging mailing list were annoyed and also ends with what I think the crucial question is: What are you hoping to get out of your vlog? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few days ago Penelope Trunk&#039;s post Thinking about videoblogging? You should probably forget about it caused all sorts of discussion on the videoblogging mailing list. Anne from Loaded Pun explains why people on the videoblogging mailing list were annoyed and also ends with what I think the crucial question is: What are you hoping to get out of your vlog? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penelope Trunk</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2958</link>
		<dc:creator>Penelope Trunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/#comment-2958</guid>
		<description>Bill, guess what? My husband is a video artist. The last link in my post is to his art.

When I met him, he was the first person at the UCLA film program to work with interactive video, and the piece he was working on became part of the UCLA film school curriculum.

I fell in love with him because of his vision, and passion for expressing himself no matter how much money it would ever make. So I totally know where you&#039;re coming from on this.

What I learned from you is that I need to be really careful to give each of my posts context. I hope that I can discourage people from starting a video blog as a way to promote themselves in their business life, because I don&#039;t think it works for most people. But I like to think that I make my own contribution to those not-in-it-for-the-money video artistis by supporting my husband in his work.

Thanks for keeping me in line :)

Penelope</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, guess what? My husband is a video artist. The last link in my post is to his art.</p>
<p>When I met him, he was the first person at the UCLA film program to work with interactive video, and the piece he was working on became part of the UCLA film school curriculum.</p>
<p>I fell in love with him because of his vision, and passion for expressing himself no matter how much money it would ever make. So I totally know where you&#039;re coming from on this.</p>
<p>What I learned from you is that I need to be really careful to give each of my posts context. I hope that I can discourage people from starting a video blog as a way to promote themselves in their business life, because I don&#039;t think it works for most people. But I like to think that I make my own contribution to those not-in-it-for-the-money video artistis by supporting my husband in his work.</p>
<p>Thanks for keeping me in line :)</p>
<p>Penelope</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill C.</title>
		<link>http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2956</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2006/11/21/thinking-of-video-blogging-you-should-probably-forget-it/#comment-2956</guid>
		<description>Penelope:  I understand your point about your blog being about careers.  As someone who was pointed to this page directly, having zero context for your statements, I read the title literally: &quot;Thinking of video blogging? You should probably forget it.&quot; and that&#039;s what I responded to.

Had the title been &quot;Thinking of video blogging _as_a_career_? You should probably forget it.&quot;, I would have agreed with you along the &quot;don&#039;t quit your day job&quot; lines. :)  One of the most technically well-done videoblogs/shows that I&#039;ve seen is Galacticast (www.galacticast.com), and Rudy still has a day job.  I can only think of two situations where an independent production company created a videoblog and got picked up and funded to the point that they can call that their career.  I&#039;m sure there are probably a couple more, but I&#039;m not aware of them.

In the context of a career, the &#039;problem&#039; with videoblogging is convincing someone that their money is well spent funding YOUR collection of videos on the internet.  To do that, you would have to convince them that you had X viewership, and that the ROI is there from your viewers to justify them sponsoring you.  I don&#039;t think there&#039;s enough data yet for anyone to speculate on which videoblogs are going to be financially viable.  It&#039;s all a gamble.

For instance, television is based on advertising.  So many people own televisions.  So many people subscribe to cable.  So many people are known to watch X television show.  Stations can use this to sell advertising space during their 30-minute or 60-minute shows to companies attempting to sell to the demographic that watches their show.  That&#039;s what the advertisers pay for.  They pay to get their product in front of X eyes every Tuesday night @ 9pm.

Without concrete ideas about potential ROI, there&#039;s no incentive for anyone to fund a videoblog, so the concept of videoblogging as a career is currently a longshot.


... currently :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Penelope:  I understand your point about your blog being about careers.  As someone who was pointed to this page directly, having zero context for your statements, I read the title literally: &#034;Thinking of video blogging? You should probably forget it.&#034; and that&#039;s what I responded to.</p>
<p>Had the title been &#034;Thinking of video blogging _as_a_career_? You should probably forget it.&#034;, I would have agreed with you along the &#034;don&#039;t quit your day job&#034; lines. :)  One of the most technically well-done videoblogs/shows that I&#039;ve seen is Galacticast (www.galacticast.com), and Rudy still has a day job.  I can only think of two situations where an independent production company created a videoblog and got picked up and funded to the point that they can call that their career.  I&#039;m sure there are probably a couple more, but I&#039;m not aware of them.</p>
<p>In the context of a career, the &#039;problem&#039; with videoblogging is convincing someone that their money is well spent funding YOUR collection of videos on the internet.  To do that, you would have to convince them that you had X viewership, and that the ROI is there from your viewers to justify them sponsoring you.  I don&#039;t think there&#039;s enough data yet for anyone to speculate on which videoblogs are going to be financially viable.  It&#039;s all a gamble.</p>
<p>For instance, television is based on advertising.  So many people own televisions.  So many people subscribe to cable.  So many people are known to watch X television show.  Stations can use this to sell advertising space during their 30-minute or 60-minute shows to companies attempting to sell to the demographic that watches their show.  That&#039;s what the advertisers pay for.  They pay to get their product in front of X eyes every Tuesday night @ 9pm.</p>
<p>Without concrete ideas about potential ROI, there&#039;s no incentive for anyone to fund a videoblog, so the concept of videoblogging as a career is currently a longshot.</p>
<p>&#8230; currently :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
